Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of nationalistic thinking
Importance of politics in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of nationalistic thinking
Self-determination is a feeling of a certain culture or a group of people in a country who want to be able to branch off and form their own nation allowing them to make decisions for themselves. But, self-determination can also be related to many of the major conflicts in the world today. Depending on a country's national interests it can determine their success or failure of a country. National interests of a country can directly impact the world in a positive or negative way depending on their policies. Nationalism can cause many problems for a country. Ultra Nationalistic views by a leader can cause catastrophes for the whole world. The quote talks about self-determination and the problems of having wars. The perspectives given by the author can be disputed to be right and wrong by many. Along with that, war does and does not have the ability to solve many conflicts in the world today. War, historically has been able to successfully resolve a conflict between nations. …show more content…
For example, many nations in Africa have been affected by a feeling of self-determination. Many African countries have regressed since gaining independence from their owner countries because of being riddled with poverty, wars, and leaders who took advantage of their own citizens for their own personal gains. The author’s opinion on self-determination can be disagreed by many because of the countless acts of terror by extremists who will go to any length to get their own nation. In the end, self-determination can be known to create a sense of resentment between
As the international shift towards nationalism and self-determination gained momentum in the years after World War II as a result to imperialism’s dangerous influence on the world during the war, decolonization becomes the inevitable truth for nations on both sides of the colonial relationship between an occupying country and a subjugated
1. The three components of the American System were establishing a new protective tariff, starting a new transportation system and restoring the national bank. Henry Clay thought that each of these components would strengthen and unify the nation because he thought the American system would unite the nation’s economic resources because the south would grow food and raise animals that the north would eat and in return the south would by the manufactured goods the north made. A new transportation system would allow trade between the north and the south. Now America could finally become independent economically. And the tariff would help because during the War of 1812 British merchants brought a great deal of products to the United States and sold them at much lower prices than American made goods, so the tariff would raise the prices of the British goods so the American merchants could sell their products at a lower price.
Q6. Nationalism was both known as a unifying and a disunifying force, your opinion depended on your perspective and background knowledge of the topic. Nationalism could be seen as a uniting force by bringing those together who believed in a single "nationality," or ancestors. Those who believed that nationalism was a unifying force also refused to be loyal to a king or queen, but they did remain loyal to those whom shared a common bond. Naturally, there were other who had different beliefs towards the topic. There were people who believed of nationalism as a disunifying force die to the fact that it would disrupt their wants to restore the old order before the French Revolution.
Political violence is action taken to achieve political goals that may include armed revolution, civil strife, terrorism, war or other such activities that could result in injury, loss of property or loss of life. Political violence often occurs as a result of groups or individuals believing that the current political systems or anti-democratic leadership, often being dictatorial in nature, will not respond to their political ambitions or demands, nor accept their political objectives or recognize their grievances. Formally organized groups, Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), businesses and collectives of individual citizens are non-state actors, that being that they are not locally, nationally or internationally recognized legitimate civilian or military authorities. The Cotonou Agreement of 2000 defines non-state actors as being those parties belonging to the private sector, economic and social partners and civil society in all its forms according to national characteristics. Historical observation shows that nation states with political institutions that are not capable of, or that are resistant to recognizing and addressing societies issues and grievances are more likely to see political violence manifest as a result of disparity amongst the population. This essay will examine why non-state political violence occurs including root and trigger causes by looking at the motivations that inspire groups and individuals to resort to non-conforming behaviors that manifest as occurrences of non-state political violence. Using terrorism and Islamic militancy on the one side, and human rights and basic freedoms on the other as examples, it will look at these two primary kinds of political violence that are most prevalent in the world ...
Tucker, Carole. "African Nationalism and Liberation in Post World War II Africa." Suite. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Apr. 2014.
Prior to and after WWI the world saw a rise in nationalistic sentiments. The Middle East was not immune to this new ideology. Although Arab Nationalism had a start in the Ottoman Empire, its rise among the masses did not begin until after WWI. While a total rise in Arab Nationalism became apparent on the Arabian Peninsula, a separate nationalist movement began in Palestine as a way to combat a unique and repressive situation. In Palestine the British mandate, along with British support, and the world's support for Zionist immigration into Palestine, caused a number of European Zionists to move into the country. These factors created an agitated atmosphere among Palestinians. Although there was more than one factor in creating a Palestinian-centered Arab Nationalism, the mounting Zionist immigration was among the most prevalent of forces.
Many wars have been fought in our society. But from these wars, countries usually learn from their mistakes, which makes a better world for society. However, there have been many times when countries do not learn from these mistakes, which can cause a conflict. In the late 1800s the British started to explore Africa and Asia. In doing so, they colonized many nations. However, many people living in these colonies did not agree with the British and revolted. This led to the British granting independence to these countries. However, there were many times when the British government did not help these countries become independent. This has caused many countries to fail, because they were not ready for the challenges of independence. One country that became independent from the British was Burma. However, since there independence, they have been fighting one of the longest civil wars in the history of the world. In this paper, I will investigate, if the reason that the conflict in Burma is still happening, is because the British allowed them to become independence pre maturely, and the British did not help Burma get though the challenges of becoming a nations.
Nationalism at its core is the support of a country. The goal of a country is to have some sort of resonance within the individuals that reside there that call themselves citizens. If the citizens don’t feel any connection with their country, they may move to find one that they feel closer too. Once found, they may support the country over others, defend it within conversations of politics or just find groups that have the same ideals they do about the country. This papers purpose is to illustrate the pros of nationalism as well as its cons.
For my essay I will be evaluating the sub-saharan African country of Liberia. Over the course of this essay i shall try and shed some light on the main threats to peace and stability in the country. Threats that, if not treated responsibly and correctly, could throw Liberia, the Liberian people and potentially a large proportion of West Africa back into the violence and political instability that has plagued the region over the last few decades.
There were many important historical events and reforms happening in the world between 1910 and 1945. Of these many life changing occurrences there are three that are particularly significant over many others. These events include the First World War, the Great Depression, as well as the murder of around six million Jewish people in the Holocaust. Throughout these events the beliefs of militarism and nationalism can be seen clearly in most of them. Each of these incidents led to adaptations of the circumstances in many types of literature. As such, poems were used as significant ways to transport their feelings, three specific poems that do this includes “Peace”(Brooke, Rupert, 1914), “Pantoum of the Great Depression” (Justice,
Anderson notes that the emergence of nationalism was made possible by “a half-fortuitous, but explosive, interaction between a system of production…, a technology…., and the fatality of human linguistic diversity” (p. 43). The “system of production” refers to capitalism, a “technology” refers to the invention and use of the printing press, and the “fatality of linguistic diversity” refers to the eventual adoption of certain languages to dominate certain geographic areas. Print-capitalism made it possible for rapidly growing numbers of people to think about themselves and to relate themselves to others in new ways (p. 36). The spread of capitalism was aided by three extraneous factors, two of which contributed directly to the rise of national consciousness. The first was a change in the character of Latin itself. Early pre-Christian literature was spreading through the print-market. Second was the impact of the Reformation, which owed much of its success to print-capitalism. Before the age of print, Rome easily won every war in Western Europe because it always had better internal lines of communication than its challengers, but when in 1517 when Martin Luther nailed his theses to the chapel-door it was seen in every part of the country within fifteen days. Third was the slow, geographically uneven, spread of particular dialects as instruments of administrative centralization. Here it is useful to remember that the universality of Latin in mediaeval Western Europe never corresponded to a universal political system (p. 39-40).
The Rise of Nationalism In the 1800s, a new force rose within the heart of Europe that helped bring about the Great War. The force was nationalism - the belief that loyalty to a person's nation and its political and economic goals comes before any other public loyalty. During the 1800's nationalism took hold among people who shared a common language, history, or culture. Such people began to view themselves as members a national group or nation.
The incidence of civil war has been seen in all regions of the world from ancient times well into modernity. Fortunately, for most areas of the world, civil war has become a declining trend in recent history, but in Africa, this trend seems to have been upwards. Why has civil war continued to prevail in Africa in an increasingly passive and democratic world? Paul Collier, Professor of Economics and Director of the Centre for the Study of African Economies at Oxford University asks, “Of course, every civil war has its story – the personalities, the social cleavages, the triggering events, the inflammatory discourse, the atrocities. But is there anything more? Are there structural conditions – social, political, or economic – which make a country prone to civil war” (Collier, 1). Is it possible that Africa may be different in respect of civil war? To better understand, we must dive into a comparative case, using the success of Botswana and the failure of Sierra Leone. Looking at the histories, economies, and political atmosphere of each country, we can better understand reasons behind these all to often, terrible civil wars. I would first like to disclaim that the cases presented in this paper are the sole reasons behind civil war. There are many factors that play into civil wars, and to say there is one single reason behind a civil war would be inconclusive. I am only presenting one possible explanation of the matter at hand.
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.
Shillington, K. (1997). The birth of independence. Causes and consequences of independence in Africa (pp.37-41). London: Evans.