Tyranny: Definition Of Tyranny In The United States

797 Words2 Pages

On Federalist Paper #47 of 1788, James Madison states, "The accumulation of all powers... in the same hands... may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." (Doc 1) Tyranny is prevented by the Constitution in many ways. This includes using a type of government known as Federalism, forming Congress with both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as using a system of checks and balances. Although the United States has been protected from tyranny due to the Constitution for over 200 years, it was not the first attempt of the country to create a government that would not lead to tyranny. The Articles of Confederation, the original constitution of the U.S. was the first step. But, the Articles of Confederation clearly did not do enough to protect against tyranny. For example, under the Articles of Confederation, the states were not obliged to pay taxes to the federal government which lead to the states …show more content…

It is pretty clear that this has been a key way to preventing tyranny in the U.S. The federal government of the U.S. is made up of three branches known as the executive, legislative and judicial. The constitution has vested certain powers on these branches. But, any powers that are not specifically granted to the federal government are given to the state governments. Under the 10th Amendment, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Federalism did not exist within the Articles of Confederation which lead the state governments to become a tyrant over the federal government. By forming their own armed forces, coining their own money and collecting taxes based on their own will, the states were recognizably their own functioning countries. Federalism assures that neither the state or the federal government will be a tyrant over the

Open Document