Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss educational models for gifted and talented children
Discuss educational models for gifted and talented children
Classification Of Giftedness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Dilemma
It was the first day of school. The new GRT checked his mailbox and found that he had 18 identified gifted students to educate of this year. He noticed four of the names had purple italicized text next to each name. Twice-Exceptional. His insides felt unstable. The classes offered at his college included a Special Ed course, but now these children were right there in front of him. He would be responsible for their individual successes for an entire year or more. He had five In-Service days to get to know the building, all of the teachers, the administration, and understand how uniquely different each of his Twice-Exceptionals were. There were also 14 other children. He knew his identified students would be asynchronous learners.
…show more content…
In a classroom with one or more Twice-Exceptional children, this task can be overwhelming and unsuccessful at times for teachers that are not equipped with research based strategies to meet their specific individualized needs. It is imperative for classroom teachers and GRTs to understand the roles and responsibilities of their school districts, strategies that are best suited for the explicit disability, and the most current research in the …show more content…
They have been termed as a group of underserved and under stimulated youth by most localities. Brody and Mills [1997] argue that this population of students "could be considered the most misunderstood of all exceptionalities." This occurs because it is difficult for educational professionals to reconcile the twice-exceptional learner’s extreme strengths with their noticeable weaknesses. A GRT should seek to understand the roles and responsibilities that their school districts have documented. This can be extremely challenging because each district may have varying viewpoints as well as each school. “Federal regulations do not exist for gifted education services. Overall guidelines for school divisions to identify and serve gifted students are provided in the Virginia Regulations Governing Educational Services for Gifted Students at 8VAC20-40-10 et. seq. Each school division provides its own identification of and services for gifted students in accordance with its local plan for gifted education. However, the gifted education regulations acknowledge the underrepresentation of students who are culturally different, have disabilities, or come from low socioeconomic backgrounds in gifted education programs. As a result, school divisions are encouraged to make an effort to identify for gifted education services students with disabilities and
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(4), 322-336.
The problem associated with how students are chosen to join a gifted and talented program stems from the way that we define giftedness. Because there are countless ways in which any individual can define talent, the government created a federal task force in 1972 to study gifted education in order to standardize the way in which schools choose students for and implement their gifted and talented programs. The task force’s results are known as the Marland Report and include much information as a result of their research, including a decision that a public school’s gifted and talented programs should aim to serve between 3 and 5 percent o...
The Talents Unlimited Model was created under the philosophy that all students, both those identified as gifted and those not, would benefit from enrichment programs. The model is used to educate teachers on how to use differentiated instruction to use “higher order cognitive tasks to help students with varying abilities use their preferred thinking talents to manipulate instruction to solve problems, see broad relationships, evaluate varying perspectives, draw comparisons among disparate viewpoints, and predict causes and effects” (Schlichter, 2009, p. 434).
Bryant, D. P., Smith, D. D., & Bryant, B. R. (2008). Teaching Students with Special Needs in
Whitney, C. S. & Hirsch, G. (2011). Helping Gifted Children Soar. A Practical Guide for
This article is about “the difficulties of meeting the needs of twice-exceptional (2e) students, including students who are gifted with learning disabilities (LD)” (Yssel, 2014, p. 42). The problem with identifying students like this, is that they either mask their disability with their giftedness or vice versa. This masking effect “may cause both exceptionalities to appear less extreme; a student may fail to meet gifted criteria because the disability affects testing performance, or the student is performing at grade level and thus does not qualify for services under LD. In the past schools throughout the United States used the discrepancy model to identify students with LD” (Yssel, 2014, p. 44). “One major argument against the discrepancy model was that it makes early identification of a learning disability difficult” (Taylor, 2009, p 109). The twice exceptional students’ “needs were not evident until upper elementary or even middle school, at which point their frustration and LD might have permanently affected their motivation and ability to make appropriate progress in the curriculum with the reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act in 2004, some states have since mandated use of the Response to intervention model. RTI replaces the wait-to-fail component of the discrepancy model with early intervention. The RTI model is divided into three tiers, in the first tier there is, observations and a Universal screening (which) identifies students who are academically at risk; during this screening, however, is when teachers and other professionals should consider whether they might be missing students who are gifted with LD.” (Yssel, 2014, p. 44).Ali, Mark and Lacy are three students that have a learning disa...
Pupils who exhibit gifted characteristics along with another disability are referred to as ‘twice-exceptional students’ (Morrison, 2001; Nielsen 2002). This term is used in the article that I have chosen to review, which analyzes the responses and perceptions through interview, of one particular individual (Andrew) who was identified as being gifted and talented (G/T) and who had emotional and behavioral disabilities (EBD). What the researchers aimed to accomplish through this analysis was a clearer understanding of Andrew’s community and school experiences, as they stated that there was a lack of empirical data focusing upon pupils who displayed such behaviors.
The Gifted program exists to provide more academic opportunities for those who qualify as “gifted.” “’Gifted means performing or demonstrating the potential for performing at significantly higher levels of accomplishment in one or more academic fields due to intellectual ability, when compared to others of similar age, experience, and environment’” (Quoted in “Gifted”). In order to make it into the program the student must show higher intellectual ability than the average student at his or her age, but what determines that factor? The student must take a multidimensional test and score in the 98th percentile. However, the most weighted part of the test remains an average IQ test. Intelligence test scores should not be the primary qualification for admittance into the gifted program. They should not remain the primary qualification because it allows the minorities and the economically disadvantaged to be underrepresented, it proves insufficient when compared to other means of testing, and it fails to accurately reflect a student’s intelligence.
Standard 1.1 discusses how special education teachers need to understand how language, culture, and family background influences the learning of students with exceptionalities. Standard 4.3 discusses how teachers should collaborate with other teachers and parents to use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions. Standard 5.5 discusses the transition plans they have to implement in collaboration with the students, families, and teachers. Standard 6.3 discusses how teachers understand that diversity is a part of families, cultures, and schools, and that they can interact with the delivery of special education services. Standard 7.0 discusses the collaborations that teachers need to start having with families, educators, and related service providers. 7.3 discusses the promotion of collaborations for the well-being of the individuals with exceptionalities. These standards show what the teacher is beginning to do with the families that have a child with
Two years ago, I embarked on a journey that would teach me more than I had ever imagined. As a recent college graduate, I was thrilled to finally begin my teaching career in a field I have always held close to my heart. My first two years as a special education teacher presented countless challenges, however, it also brought me great fulfillment and deepened my passion for teaching students with special needs. The experiences I have had both before and after this pivotal point in my life have undoubtedly influenced my desire to further my career in the field of special education.
A common misconception is intelligence is inherited and does not change, so therefore, gifted children do not need special services. However, this mindset is very dangerous when it comes to the development of gifted children. It is widely believed that gifted students will get by on their own without any assistance from their school. After all,
One ethical theory that is related to the Gifted and Talented students is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is doing what is best for the majority of the people. In a classroom setting, the teacher would do what is best to enhance learning for the middle, and majority, of their class. However, this leaves out students who are above average and are considered to be Gifted and Talented. This leaves these students to be on their own in order to challenge themselves. However, most students will not take it upon themselves to seek out more learning opportunities and instead might direct their time to acting out in class, distracting others, or becoming so bored that they start to fall behind. Obviously, this is something that needs to be fixed. In the past, this was the only option students really had who were Gifted and Talented. Now, with programs in schools and supplementary activities that teachers have, these students are able to succeed. Because of this, the perception that GT students have a disability has come to light and is proven that this is untrue. The perception has indeed changed and students who are Gifted and Talented are viewed as students who are considerably advanced and need support and a curriculum to enhance their academic
Author unkown (2003, March 9). In gifted classrooms is diversity lacking?. Salisbury Daily Times. Retrieved March 10, 2003, from http://www.dailytimesonline.com/new/stories/20030309/localnews/1142640.html
In society today, there are many children and parents who face the diagnosis of having a developmental disability that would qualify them for special education and needs. This time can come with many questions for the parents when they realize the specialized care and education their child will need. Most often, questions arise about their schooling and how they will be included with other children, as well as what services are available to their child. How their disability impacts their life is a very valid concern because their education will be impacted. When a disability is discovered, it effects trickle down from the child to the parents, to the teachers and finally the medical and educational specialists.
Winebrenner, S. (2003). Teaching strategies for twice-exceptional students [Electronic version]. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38. Retrieved March 4, 2004, from http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=EJ659359&db=eric