Transworld Depravity Analysis

1462 Words3 Pages

The problem of evil, as articulated by J.L. Mackie, concerns the consistency of the following claims typically accepted by theists: God is omniscient; God is omnipotent; God is omnibenevolent; evil exists. If God is omniscient, then he should know about all evil that exists. If God is omnipotent, then it should be within his power to prevent all evil from occurring. Finally, if God is omnibenevolent, then it should be the case that he would not permit the evil that he is capable of preventing. The fact that evil does exist seems to indicate an inconsistency in the set of claims. In other words, the existence of evil seems to threaten the status of at least one of the divine attributes. This paper will explicate Alvin Plantinga's response to the problem of evil, in which he invokes the concept of transworld depravity. He argues that it is possible that all agents suffer this condition, and so, if this were the case, then God could not actualize any possible world in which free …show more content…

If the condition were a non-essential property, then, even if it turned out to obtain, it certainly seems that a morally perfect world could have been actualized containing non-depraved agents. However, given Plantinga's definition of an essential property, it seems that transworld depravity would have to be essential to the agents who suffer from it. For a property to be essential to an agent, it must be the case that in all possible worlds where the agent exists they possess that property. Similarly, transworld depravity is also defined as pertaining to every possible world in which the afflicted agent exists. Therefore, for a given agent who suffers from transworld depravity, there are no possible worlds in which that agent is transworld depravity-free (or only freely acts morally

Open Document