Train To Pakistan is written by Khushwant Singh. He is India’s best known writer and columnist. He has been founder-editor of Yojana and editor of the Illustrated Weekly of India, and National Herald and the Hindustan Times. He is the author of classics such as Train To Pakistan, I Shall Not Hear the Nightingale, Delhi, Burial At Sea and Paradise. His latest, The Sunset Club, written when he as 95, was published by Penguin Books in 2010 .His non-fiction includes the classic two-volume A History of Sikhs, a number of translations and works on Sikh religion and culture, Delhi, nature, current affairs and Urdu poetry. His autobiography, Truth, Love and a Little Malice, was published by Penguin Books in 2002. He was a member of parliament from …show more content…
He passed way in 2014 at the age of 99.
His novels grows out with the chronological sequence of time with the synthesis of time and values. In the novel Train To Pakistan ,it expresses creatively as how the movement of trains use to set the tone of the village , signalling the time for action, rest and sleep, became a symbol of despair, darkness and destruction. This technique of contrast is very suggestive.
Train To Pakistan introduces us to the summer of 1947 which is not the same as the rest of the summers before as it was the year of independence. Though there was the sense of happiness all around but the partition put the barriers around the happiness of all Indians and Muslims. It is not the story of the individual but the all who suffered at the time of partition. Violence forced all the people to be theirselves being included in the battle which was going at the time of partition. Apart of the hustle and bustle going around in the Nation, Mano Majra, a village on the border of India and Pakistan does not mean much to the Sikhs and Muslims. There was no war and peace among all the people. Hindu, Muslims, Sikhs all lived together and respect each other . Muslims speak Punjabi language as there more population of Sikhs in Mano
…show more content…
The situation got worsened and effects the happy faces of Mano Majra. The characters are situated in non-fictitious and hard core reality, struggle to maintain the balance consistently between what is good and bad.
It is the story about the violence during Hindustan and Pakistan creation in 1947 , so naturally we can assume that it is the story about the Hindu – Muslim communal violence , where there are some good people and some bad people in both the parties , some heroes and some villains . Good trying to save good people from opposite side whereas people turning bad towards their own side people.
Khushwant Singh gives us the clear picture of social, political, physical and mental atmosphere. During the period, the people have got their freedom back but they have not realised and thought about the destruction which took place in all over the India especially in Mano
In every short story there is always a deeper meaning to the literature work, any author wants to communicate a multi-layered idea, to their readers, they wants their readers to connect to the short story that they are telling. The authors of these types of literature writings are able to take their readers on a journey within their writings. When a person reads these literary works, they begin to unravel and interpret the symbolic nature of the character’s journey throughout the short story. Also, the journey is
This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.
reflects upon the theme of the novel. As it highlights the fact that if people in the society
However, that is also not open. He narrate the story and in a sense to prove the ideology right. Moreover, it cannot be said that he consciously did it. He is narrating what he has seen. He himself is not condemning it. He is a European and seeing thing through his perspective. He also thinks natives as savage and unconsciously described Eurocentricism. In the novel, every now and then he uses word savage. The readers also do not get each and everything. Not everyone can comprehend each and everything. Moreover, the writer also does not openly explain everything. He leaves it to the imagination and the understanding of reader. There is always gap left, which needs to be filled. This study is carried out to fill in the gaps and enlighten the readers with the evil. This study is meant to give better understanding of the and the ideology.
There seems to have developed a pattern in modern literature ironic and paradoxical, that involves the hero in struggle for identify in a world that almost always is rejected by him as incomprehensible or absurd. Because of the omnivorous nature of the novel as a literary form, both the intellectual theme of defiance and the metaphysical anguish are presented not only in sophisticated, cosmopolitan, intellectual settings, but also in provincial atmospheres, where daily routines, sounds, and smells are very familiar.
Against the backdrop of a brand-new liberalized world, Kapur sketches out Shagun’s boredom, Raman’s hurt and the confusion of their children, Roohi and Arjun, who are batted back and forth between parents and across chapters. The two new partners in the equation, boss man Ashok and divorcee Ishita, struggle to woo their step kids while supporting
The theme of this book is that the human capacity to adapt to and find happiness in the most difficult circumstances. Each character in the novel shows this in their way. For instance, their family is randomly taken from their home and forced to work but they still remain a close nit family. In addition, they even manage to stick together after being separated for one of their own. These show how even in the darkest time they still manage to find a glimmer of hope and they pursued on.
The author’s intention in the beginning of Mahtab’s story is to give the reader a descriptive introduction regarding the feelings and cricumstances of Mahtab’s journey. She uses descriptive language to inform the reader of Mahtab’s feelings of uncertainty as the “fog of darkness” (p.2) closes in on the family as they travel by truck through the Afghani mountains in a search for a better life.
In “On the Subway” by Sharon Olds, the author contrasts two divergent people. Olds come to many conclusions as a result of the experience. Sharon Olds utilizes tone, poetic devices such as metaphor, and finally imagery.
Stylistically, the book is arranged in rotating chapters. Every fourth chapter is devoted to each individual character and their continuation alo...
When discussing the controversial authors of Indian literature, one name should come to mind before any other. Salman Rushdie, who is best known for writing the book “Midnights Children.” The first two chapters of “Midnights Children” are known as “The Perforated Sheet”. In “The Perforated Sheet” Rushdie utilizes magic realism as a literary device to link significant events and their effects on the lives of Saleem’s family to a changing India. In fact, it is in the beginning of the story that the reader is first exposed to Rushdie’s use of magic realism when being introduced to Saleem. “On the stroke of midnight/clocks joined palms” and “the instant of India’s arrival at independence. I tumbled forth into the world”(1711). Rushdie’s description of the clocks “joining palms” and explanation of India’s newfound independence is meant to make the reader understand the significance of Saleem’s birth. The supernatural action of the clocks joining palms is meant to instill wonder, while independence accentuates the significance of the beginning of a new era. Rushdie also utilizes magic realism as an unnatural narrative several times within the story to show the cultural significance of events that take place in the story in an abnormal way.
Recent years have witnessed a large number of Indian English fiction writers who have stunned the literary world with their works. The topics dealt with are contemporary and populist and the English is functional, communicative and unpretentious. Novels have always served as a guide, a beacon in a conflicting, chaotic world and continue to do so. A careful study of Indian English fiction writers show that there are two kinds of writers who contribute to the genre of novels: The first group of writers include those who are global Indians, the diasporic writers, who are Indians by birth but have lived abroad, so they see Indian problems and reality objectively. The second group of writers are those born and brought up in India, exposed to the attitudes, morale and values of the society. Hence their works focus on the various social problems of India like the plight of women, unemployment, poverty, class discrimination, social dogmas, rigid religious norms, inter caste marriages, breakdown of relationships etc.
‘The Guide’ is R.K. Narayan’s best and most famous work. A 1958 novel, it won the SahityaAkademi Award for English in 1960. It was made even more famous and popular by the on-screen immortalization by DevAnand and WaheedaRahman in the 1965 movie of the same name.
...tween the Hindus and Muslims, Jinnah felt that Muslims had no future in India (Overfield 216). With the end of British rule in 1947, not only did India gain its independence but also along with it was born an other country, Pakistan where Jinnah served as the first governor (Overfield 216). With the gain of India’s independence, Gandhi was shot the following year in 1948 by a Hindu zealot who resented his commitment to Hindu – Muslim harmony (Overfield 212).
...shown through Lenny’s point of view. Prior the partition, Lahore was a place of tolerance that enjoyed a secular state. Tension before the partition suggested the division of India was imminent, and that this would result in a religious. 1947 is a year marked by human convulsion, as 1 million people are reported dead because of the partition. Moreover, the children of Lahore elucidate the silences Butalia seeks in her novel. The silence of survivors is rooted to the nature of the partition itself; there is no clear distinction as to who were the antagonists. The distinction is ambiguous, the victims were Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims, and moreover these groups were the aggressors, the violent. The minority in this communal violence amongst these groups was the one out-numbered. This epiphany of blame is embarked in silence, and roots from the embodiment of violence.