Too Late

558 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Rise of nuclear weapons

When one looks at the trends of nuclear weapons, it is a very scary idea. Depending on how one views nuclear weapons will influence how the world is perceived in present time. With the massive stockpile of weapons that is in the world, life, as we know it could completely be eliminated. In general we see the arms race as a necessity to keep the communists in Russia from getting to be to powerful and thus be able to threaten us with them. We needed just as many missiles as they did in order to keep a balance and thus be able to match any threats. However, this has now changed and with more and more countries being able to build and use nuclear devices, this threat is now greater than ever.

It should be noted that we could never marshal the research and development of nuclear weapons. While most nations will sign treaties that state they will stop producing nuclear weapons, places like Iraqi will always be trying to build them. We can blame the United States and Russia for the trend of nations wanting as many “nukes” as possible. During the Cold War both nations tried to build as many weapons as possible.

This was based on the fact that each nation thought that if the other would attack, they would need enough weapons to destroy the other. This was a good policy in terms of warfare. In terms of world security, this seems to be a good idea. Knowing that if your nation launched missiles on a nuclear state, retaliation would be deadly. One had to decide if they could survive ...

Show More
Related

  • How The United States Contained Communism in the Cold War

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... In America, people practiced air-raid drills and built bomb shelters in preparation for possible nuclear warfare. The U.S. also built up its army and its air force, just to be prepared. Overseas, the U.S. enforced the Eisenhower Doctrine, which was a threat warning communist countries not to attack the Middle East, lest they wanted to begin all out war. The United States also engaged in an Arms Race with the Soviet Union to see who could build the most powerful and destructive weapons and technologies.

    Read More

  • In Defense of Truman's Use of the Atomic Bomb

    1516 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...d by widespread hysteria and hostility between the two superpowers. The United States’ role as a peacemaker was forever challenged by the use of this weapon and for the rest of his time as president, Truman would fight to stop the spread of communism and the greatest fear of the succeeding presidents was the outbreak of nuclear war. The decision Truman chose changed the course of world history. From a moral standpoint, the loss of innocent lives is never fair. The tremendous cost of using this weapon was the lives of hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese civilians from the immediate and long-term effects of bombs. Despite the moral arguments against this choice, this was the best one for the American cause. Truman’s obligation was first to the American people and as commander-in-chief, he made the decision he believed to best for his constituents.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Peace Through Strength

    543 Words  | 2 Pages

    To start off, one of the key ideas behind the tense, yet somewhat stable peace between the Soviet Union and United States during the second half of the 20th century was the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD. As both of the world’s superpowers attempted to outstrip each other in a nuclear arms race, it grew increasingly apparent that should one nation attempt to strike the other or its allies with nuclear weapons, the consequences from the secondary strike would cause an unacceptable loss of life and likely the extinction of the human race. Consider the Cuban Missile Crisis, for instance. There were multiple times where all out nuclear war between the East and the West ca...

    Read More

  • More Will Be Worse Scott Sagan Summary

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scott D. Sagan, the author of chapter two of “More Will Be Worse”, looks back on the deep political hostilities, numerous crises, and a prolonged arms race in of the cold war, and questions “Why should we expect that the experience of future nuclear powers will be any different?” The author talks about counter arguments among scholars on the subject that the world is better off without nuclear weapons. In this chapter a scholar named Kenneth Waltz argues that “The further spread of nuclear weapons may well be a stabilizing factor in international relations.” He believes that the spread of nuclear weapons will have a positive implications in which the likely-hood of war decreases and deterrent and defensive capabilities increase. Although there

    Read More

  • Christians' Justifications of Using Nuclear Weapons

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    We are told, "To love thy neighbour" and "To treat." our enemies, as we would want to be treated. " If you were to look at these commandments you would see that nuclear warfare could never be justified, and if you do provoke a nuclear war, you should be punished. That brings me into the second reason why countries retain nuclear weapons and that is a threat. It is a way of protecting your country, but you will protect yourself and retaliate if provoked.

    Read More

  • Ronald Reagan Strategic Defense Initiative

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the strategic defense initiative, or SDI, was proposed, there were many factors that led up to Ronald Reagan's idea. In 1949, the Soviet Union created their first nuclear bomb. After these deadly weapons were created, airplanes were the primary way to deliver the missiles. This was up until the late 1960s when the form of rocketry was introduced. As the Soviet Union and United States continued to hate each other, both President Eisenhower and President Nixon created ways to defend the United States from Soviet bombs. By 1972 the United States and Soviet Union signed the anti-ballistic missile Treaty, or ABM treaty. The ABM treaty "forbid the testing and deployment of ballistic missile defenses, deflected**** and codified this recognition of offensive su...

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb: America's Instrument of Unconditional Surrender

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    The second side of the double-edged sword dealt perhaps the most significant blow. While the U.S. directed the force at Japan, they also had in mind the desire to show the entire world the force that it had within its grasp. From the beginning of the development of the atomic bomb, the world knew that it would be an unstoppable weapon. With the U.S. having possession of this new weapon, they had the potential to be viewed as an unstoppable force. The decisions the U.S. made about the atomic bomb would change the way the entire world viewed them. If they used it willingly and wisely, they would be viewed with respect and authority. If they used it blindly and carelessly, they would be viewed with fear and hatred. And if they didn’t use it at all, the world might question their willpower and influence. The atomic bomb became the final step to ending WWII, meaning that the war ended on U.S. terms and conditions. The U.S. had previously been waiting for the Soviet Union to join in the fight against the Japanese, but they knew that waiting could mean a prolonged war and the appearance of being weak. The atomic bomb meant that the U.S. “should not need the Russians” (Document E). The U.S. wanted to make it clear to the Soviet Union that they would not submit to their every demand. “Unconditional surrender” on U.S. terms also meant that other nations, including the Soviet Union, would not be able to have decision making power when it came to bargaining or signing treaties. This same bargaining power would potentially carry over into the new United Nations, and the U.S. would never be seen the same again by the world largely because they chose to use the atomic bomb as a weapon that demanded respect and

    Read More

  • COLD War and the Arms Race

    1673 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the 1950’s, the United States "announced a policy of massive retaliation - a doctrine whereby the United States might respond with nuclear weapons to any Soviet challenge anywhere in the world," (Weapons and Arms Control) Despite America's doctrine and huge lead in the arms race, it achieved little success and did not threaten or suppress the Soviets from continuing to create nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • The Manhattan Project: The Brain Child Of The Manhattan Project

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nuclear Arms, as opposed to conventional arms, generate their destructive force from nuclear reactions. The issues that are related to the use of nuclear weapons is also far different than the issues generated by conventional bombs. The long term

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Bombing Essay

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Also today is the danger that life is extinguished on earth through such a horrible weapon , not over. Many states are in possession of nuclear bombs , because that means for them power. Even dictatorships and unjust regime like China and North Korea have nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Nuclear Weapons- A Possible End to Civilization

    2548 Words  | 6 Pages

    When we talk about nuclear weapons technology, we need to talk about the Arms Race since World War II in order to be able to understand how this technology begins. The Arms Race is a continuous race among many nations to make and improve weapons in a struggle to maintain and/or gain power. The United States and the Soviet Union are two key players in this race. These two major nuclear weapons nations see one another as a reason and a justification for spending an enormo...

    Read More

  • The Military Revolution In History

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    The arrival of nuclear weapons transformed the international playing field permanently and new threats such as non-state actors have immerged as a result. Initially, only superpowers with nuclear arsenals had a global role as was evident during the Cold War between the U.S. and Soviet Union, but nuclear proliferation triggered a race to possess this power in the last 60 years.

    Read More

  • Examing the Factors That Led To Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Nagasaki

    1303 Words  | 3 Pages

    The potential use of atomic weapons against the Japanese was appealing to the United States because it was seen as a dramatic and decisive way to end the war (Walker, ). Prior to the decision to use nuclear weapons, Japan and the United States were at odds over the terms by which the Japanese would surrender to the Americans, which did nothing but prolong the military conflict (Walker, ). Japanese leadership had expressed its desire to end the war to third parties, but could no...

    Read More

  • Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified?

    2763 Words  | 6 Pages

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This was an extremely controversial military strategy in the United States. Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bomb? The U.S. feared the rise of communism and gave aid to any country against it. The U.S. also fought countries threatening the spread communism. One of these countries was Japan. We began a harsh and brutal war against Japan and against communism. This war was killing many soldiers and Japan was not backing down. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb when things were getting worse. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a difficult one and many people wonder if it was the right choice.

    Read More

  • War: Nuclear Power

    1074 Words  | 3 Pages

    From the creation of nuclear weapons at the start of the Cold War to today, the world has experienced struggles fueled by the want of nuclear power. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Iran’s nuclear weapon program are some of the most important conflicts over nuclear weapons. Thanks to the use of nuclear weapons in 1945 to end World War II, the world has come extremely close to a nuclear war, and more countries have began developing nuclear power. Unmistakably, many conflicts since the start of the Cold War have been caused by nuclear weapons, and there are many more to come.

    Read More

More about Too Late

Open Document