To Kill A Mockingbird Should Be Banned Essay

438 Words1 Page

To Kill a Mockingbird is a prizewinning novel. Yet, many argue that this book is suffused with profane themes that promote white supremacy. A school in Mississippi removed the book from their curriculum because it confronts issues of race. Is it worth violating the Constitution for a book that exposes students to a greater view? A view to themes of racism and rape, which is still occurring in the modern society. I strongly believe that the banning of this book is a huge loss for the future generation of these young readers. Mississippi placing 49th among the 50 states for quality of education can be put into consideration that the banning of the book is questionable. Why do schools with higher academic achievements not ban this book? Parents perceive censoring as protection, but by doing so we are posing a threat to freedom of choice. Supporting the idea of parents making decisions on behalf of their children, forcefully shaping the child’s way of thinking, ending up marginalizing the lives of young readers. More importantly, this straightforward candor does not undermine young people but provides an opportunity for them to absorb and face contemporary societies that help reveal sexual issues and more. …show more content…

Such as this quote, "You aren't really a nigger-lover, then, are you?" This highlights the derogatory terms used at that time and the lesson teaching how the use of this hateful slur helps us understand more about the people who uses this than the person receiving them. This is a great life lesson taught through this “controversial” book. The act of banning this book defeats the whole purpose, leaving us vulnerable to repeat the same mistake as our ancestors. We are not justifying the right and the wrongs of our past history, it is just that we don’t want to repeat the same mistakes. As Karl Marx said, “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as

Open Document