To Kill A Mockingbird Rhetorical Analysis Essay

702 Words2 Pages

In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch emphasizes his closing argument during the Tom Robinson trail using several rhetorical strategies. Atticus attempts to persuade the jury through the use of ethos, pathos, and, most importantly, logos. Ethos is used by Atticus throughout his argument by both what he is known for and what he says. Atticus is well-known and respected throughout the town of Maycomb. Most people will listen to him and comply with whatever he says because of his reputation. One example of Atticus using ethos in his testimony is when he describes Mayella Ewell as having committed no crime, “she has merely broken a rigid and time-honored code of our society, a code so severe that whoever breaks it is hounded …show more content…

For instance, in his closing statement, Atticus reminds the jury of their bias by declaring, “the evil assumption – that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negro men are not to be trusted around our women, an assumption one associates with minds of their caliber” (273). By including this assumption, Atticus evokes the emotion of guilt from the audience. This causes the jury to question their ethical values. He shows how this assumption is false and should clearly not be taken into consideration when reviewing the evidence. He also suggests the jury should not be trusting of the opposing testimony because of the racism that exists in the town. Another emotional appeal is when Atticus concludes his argument by saying, “I am confident that you gentlemen will review without passion the evidence you have heard, come to a decision, and restore this defendant to his family. In the name of God, do your duty” (274-275). Here, Atticus used pathos by once again, by evoking guilt and a sense of responsibility in the jury. He makes the jury feel as if it is their loyalty and duty as a citizen to proclaim Tom Robinson’s innocence. Atticus displays a certain confidence in the jury – this persuades them even more to make the correct

Open Document