To Kill A Mockingbird Justice And Injustice Analysis

605 Words2 Pages

In To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout, Jem and Atticus represent moral justice because they defend Tom Robinson, while Bob Ewell and most of the town represent moral injustice and prejudice because they are against Tom Robinson just based on his race. The problem with this statement is, what defines justice and injustice? This is an interesting question, justice is usually seen as what is right, while injustice is seen as wrong, but who defines what is right or wrong. This is the interesting thing about human morals. In society what we define as right and wrong or justice and injustice can change over time. We look back at the time period of To Kill a Mockingbird and see the ideas that they had against african americans as totally wrong, but for them it was very normal. To people today Scout, Jem, and Atticus are seen as “good” people because they stood up for Tom Robinson and the African American community, but to people
This is extremely evident when you look back into the entire case. The entire white community of the town was against Tom Robinson before the trial even started only based on his race. This creates moral injustice because people today see people judging someone based only on their race is “wrong”. In the time of the story many people saw a case like this as “run of the mill” and average. To almost all people today the case would have went the other way solely based on the lack of evidence and the poor testimonies. For example, Mayella said “No I don’t recollect if he hit me. I mean yes I do, he hit me”(185). In conclusion in the story To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout, Jem, and Atticus all represent moral injustice because they defend Tom Robinson even though he is african american. Most of the rest of the town is represented as moral injustice because they judge Tom Robinson just because he is an african american. These ideas are evident all throughout the book and I believe it proves my

Open Document