Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion in the workplace
Religion in the workplace
Religious freedom in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion in the workplace
I think that Mr. Polk as well as others ought to be permitted to disregard their companies’ grooming policy by the premise of their religious proclamation. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was constructed to protect the rights of employees in the workplace regarding their sexuality, nationality or religious preferences (Fowler-Hermes & Gierbolini, 2014). In this application, Mr. Polk’s sole purpose of allowing his dreadlocks to grow was based on his belief in the Rastafarian religion (Thorne, Ferrell, & Ferrell, 2011). Wearing dreadlocks and beards shows a sign of religious conviction (Fowler-Hermes & Gierbolini, 2014). In general society, Rastafarians have the noticeable image for their unique dreadlocks and beards; although not
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the single most important piece of legislation that has helped to shape and define employment law rights in this country (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001)". Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, gender, disability, religion and national origin. However, it was racial discrimination that was the moving force of the law that created a whirlwind of a variety of discriminations to be amended into Title VII. Title VII was a striving section of legislation, an effort which had never been tried which made the passage of the law an extremely uneasy task. This paper will discuss the evolution of Title VII as well as the impact Title VII has had in the workforce.
"Feds to investigate racial profiling claims." New Haven Register [New Haven, CT] 3 Dec. 2009. General OneFile. Web. 6 Dec. 2009. .
This case is a “he said – she said” situation. It is unclear who initiated the relationship to begin with. Many relationships between professors and students “occur between male faculty members, frequently older and married, and female students” (Lane, 2006, p. 2) such as this one. The professor denying the sexual relationship may or may not have prevented a scandal. The student, if infatuated, may have filed a sexual complaint in retaliation for refusing to have a relationship with her. If the professor had rejected the relationship, he may have thought the student would falsely accuse him of sexual harassment. However, since the relationship did occur, he may not have believed he was doing anything wrong or thought he was “above” the
A.A., a five year old Native American boy and his parents’ religious beliefs were being challenged by the Needville Independent School District when he was required to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. Needville ISD had prior grooming policy preventing boys from wearing their hair in a fashion
Under Title VII the employer doesn’t have to resolve conflict in the way the employee wants. According to the book, the employer can discriminate against an employee for religious reasons if it causes undue hardships (490). Also if the employer finds out an employee has a conflict between their religion and employee’s policy, the employer is required to provide accommodation. If “accommodation isn’t possible, the employer can implement the policy” (490). In Clarissa’s case, the headmaster can provide any type of accommodation if it doesn’t cause undue hardship. Once accommodations have been provided to Clarissa, if she doesn’t want to comply she can leave the job. It doesn’t matter if Clarissa doesn’t like the way the headmaster implements the accommodations, as long as the headmaster provides accommodations.
Despite legislation for equal opportunities, sexism is still evident in the workplace. Women have made great advancements in the workforce and have become an integral part of the labor market. They have greater access to higher education and as a result, greater access to traditionally male dominated professions such as law. While statistics show that women are equal to men in terms of their numbers in the law profession, it is clear however, that they have not yet achieved equality in all other areas of their employment. Discrimination in the form of gender, sex and sexual harassment continues to be a problem in today’s society.
I found an interesting article that explain more as to how they have a double edged sword. “ Under the laws enforced by the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, it is illegal to discriminate against a potential employee because of that person’s race, color, religion, age, or disabilities. However, there are slight nuances to these rules. For example, under the same laws an employer can require all workers to follow a uniform dress code, even if it conflicts with some workers ethnic or religious practices, as long as the dress code is not treating specific employees less favorably than others because of their practices” (Daly). So A&F can say that none of its employees are to wear any type of head coverings however they cannot apply this rule to an employee, or potential employee like Samantha for wearing her hijabs. While it is extremely insensitive and shallow it really isn’t
In the narrative “My First Conk” influential black rights activist, Malcolm X, tells of the first time he straightened his hair when he moved to Boston. Malcolm uses the experience to convince blacks that they must embrace their own identity rather than changing to be like whites, because it reinforces the idea of white superiority. At this time, black men would often go through the harmful process of “conking” their hair in order to have a straight hairstyle like the white majority. Malcolm states, “Look around today… and you'll see conks on black men… It makes me wonder if the Negro has completely lost his sense of identity, lost touch with himself”(156-157). Malcolm draws to the attention of black men that conking their hair results in complete loss
In today’s society, the pressure to appear politically correct can play a major role in one’s social life. This pressure can even trigger people to support issues that are politically correct, such as affirmative action. Affirmative action is a highly controversial issue in the United States today, it has many supporters and it also has many detractors. This issue can separate many ethnic groups and even turn people of the same racial group against each other. There are many ideas that are thought of as a cure for racial inequality, but none fit the role better than affirmative action.
Malcolm X wrote of his “conk”: “This was my first really big step toward self degradation: when I endured all of that pain, literally burning my flesh to have it look like a white man’s hair. I had joined that multitude of Negro men and women in America who are brainwashed into believing that black people are ‘inferior’ –and white people ‘superior’ –that they will even violate and mutilate their God created bodies to try to look ‘pretty by white standards” (X 356). Many black men and the majority of black women have diverted themselves from the wearing of unprocessed (natural) hairstyles from the fear of losing approval from whites and fellow blacks as well.
The article “Faith in the workplace”, featured in The Economist, is about a new admonition that came up last month from America’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which stated that last year there were 3, 721 religious discrimination cases in the workforce, which makes the year 2013 with the most amount of religious discrimination cases. Therefore they enforced a law, because it’s a human right for firms to respect their workers and provide them with religious needs, that all the bosses and managers of the Western part of the world, must respect and have to allow their employees to display their religious faiths and beliefs and let them practice it while at work, for example: letting Muslim women wearing their Hijab (head scarf), letting people celebrate their special holidays. That is why all Business firms and companies have changed their rules in order to meet employee’s expectations such Abercrombie Fitch, because if they don’t meet their expectations and discriminate them they will have suffer from lawsuits and so on.
The Supreme Court was important in both suppressing and aiding the Civil Rights Movement. However, decisions taken by the President, the continued white opposition and improvements in media communications also had an effect. Although all were important, the Civil Rights movement alone would have reached the same end without the help of the Supreme Court, and the devotion of its many members and leaders is the major factor in advancing Civil Rights.
The often pushed their male spouses into voting and standing up for their rights as citizens of the United States, and with the “Black is Beautiful” movement making headway through the late 1960s onward Black women were finally able to take control of their femaleness back to their African roots, most notably through their roots. In Hair Story, Ayana Byrd and Lori Tharps write “Blacks and Whites came to believe that the way Black people wore their hair said something about their politics. Hair came to symbolize either a continued move toward integration in in the American political system or a growing cry for Black power and nationalism.” Up until the “Black is Beautiful movement” black women wore their hair as straight as possible. With the advent of the hot comb and hair relaxer (aka “creamy crack”) Black women, and men alike would put themselves thorough rigorous processes to straighten, and make their hair look as white as possible by means of very literally burning their hair and scalps. Malcom X said “We hated our African characteristics. We hated our hair. We hated the shape of our nose, and the shape of our lips, the color of our skin. That is how [Whites] imprisoned us.” That is how white Americans normalized the popular
Faith in the workplace and the level of accommodations employers should allow is an increasing problem. Moreover, the influx of people from different backgrounds bringing with them different religious practices has caused organizations to seek help from organizations such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the courts, and legal firms on how to deal with this new reality. Thus, the complexities surrounding religion and spirituality in the workplace and recommendations on the cause and solutions were examined.
There are many militaries throughout the world but the US Military is seen as the most professional and capable military in the world. We are perceived this way due to our rules and regulations that have branched from our fundamental principles and doctrine. Uniformity is one of our leading regulations in the military. Uniformity is what makes the military have a professional image. It is the basis of our instructions and regulations concerning the dress and appearance of our military personnel. Recently however, the Pentagon has decided that it is more important to accommodate certain groups of people then to have a professional and uniform military. On January 22nd 2014 the Pentagon passed a new policy that is easing up on the existing regulations by allowing beards, turbans, headscarf’s, tattoos and piercings of religious nature to be worn while in uniform (Pellerin, 2014). This new policy has started a heated debate about whether this is a good idea or not. I myself believe that this policy should not be allowed because it is undermining basic military values, lowering our standards on regulations, and it is a start to a new undesirable military force.