More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The strengths and weaknesses of attribution theory
The Self-Serving Attribution theory is when credit is given to internal reasons when one succeeds and to blame external reasons when one fails. According to this theory, Tina would explain her win to her personal bowling skills and possibly her ability to overcome Phil’s tauntings. In this case, Tina would be making an internal attribution. According to the Self-Serving Attribution theory, Tina would blame external reasons for her lose if she should lose the game. In this instance she may blame Phil’s taughting her for her lose. Tina may lay the blame with Phil because his taunting distracted her and prevented her from preforming at ther best. The belief in a just world theory is the belief that people get what they deserve. Based on this
The idea of Just War Theory was suggested by Ambrose (Perry, “Ethics and War in Comparative Religious Perspective”), formulated by Augustine, and finally refined by Aquinas. Just War Theory was not made to justify a war (since everyone can say that even total destruction was just), but rather it brings war under control of justice, so that when all nations practice it, war would eventually cease
After reading articles from (David Brooks, Garth Kemerling, Al Gini, Natasha Trethewey). I have raised my own question at issue to does morals come from the experience of “self-responsibility” of realizing your own faults in life to create a good virtue of human character or is it involuntary? Touching basis on self-responsibility, is the start of creating a good person in life and to become a great person for yourself and others, you have to realize and face your own faults.
“Just War” theory defines war as the absence of peace.Peace can be the absence of war, but finding peace in such judgmental groups is almost impossible. Nations, also known as enemies, will never come eye to eye. They differ in various areas for example religion and race. Inequalities between humans will always exist. Equally seeing the other as the same will lead to peace. Justice and peace go hand and hand. Peace is a thirst for justice in human society and while acting and behaving with fairness and mortality will settle conflicts without the use of arms. Peace, as many say, is a state of mind. It can be seen as a behavior almost. It can entail being a union. Coming together to see everyone as one and not seeing anyone as different. It is the absence of war, but until there is mutual trust in nations there will always be war. The absence of all conflict is not
As the textbook defines the Just World Hypothesis or Believe in Just world (BJW) is a belief that people get what they deserve in the life and deserve what they get. For example, people who believe in Just World, would argue that poor people are poor because of the choices and decisions they made in life. The BJW has both negative and positive side. The negative side of strong BJW is that it forces people to ignore the facts of injustice and change themselves(or their outlook on the facts), rather than changing the facts. The positive side, on the contrary is that people who themselves are victims of injustice and believe in Just World, experience less anger and much more acceptance to their current situation, decreasing chances of depressions. The article "Causal Attributions of Workplace Gender Equality Just World Belief, and the Self/Other Distinction" by Marina Bastounis and Jale Minibas-Poussard was about the Just World Belief in regards of gender equality/inequality.
The Just war theory is a doctrine that has been studied by all sorts of leaders, religions, and especially military leaders. Basically it is a doctrine that consists of all sorts of military ethics of war and broken down into two parts, Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Just ad bellum is consisted of 5 parts, the first part is legitimate authority and what that means is that the people who are making the decision of war are recognized officials and understand the strategies of war. The second reason is for a just cause, having the right reasons for going to war and understanding that violent aggression is not the plan. The third is that the last resort is going to war, and being able to understand that before a country starts a war that can be solved in less violent ways. The fourth option is prospect of success, yes winning the war is a success but how many lives can be lost and still count that as a success. The final option is the political proportionality and that is when the wrong of war is proportionally less then the wars cons. I believe that if all non violent options of Just ad bellum have been tried and were given a fair shot and the only viable option is to go to war then going to war is acceptable. But if all non violent option shave not been exhausted and war is nothing but a quick decision this can be considered wrong and
The self-serving bias is the tendency for an athlete to accommodate to factors that paint the athlete in a favorable light. In the athletic realm, individuals portray the self-serving bias to foster future, effective performance in a sport. Whereas an athlete will attribute positive events to the doing of themselves, an athlete will attribute negative events to the doing of others. Although an individual may be inaccurate when imputing a factor, the self-serving bias is a method by which an individual safeguards esteem. It is this protection of esteem that is paralleled in the attribution theory. For instance, an athlete uses the self-serving bias to attribute success as a byproduct of the team. On the other hand, the athlete uses the self-serving
Just War Theory is the belief the war is morally or legally justified. There are four most important tenets, also known as belief, principle, or creed, from the Just War Theory of Saint Augustine.
Attribution theory correlates with how people exemplify events and how it affects their behavior and thinking. People making casual explanations is known as attribution theory. It was established over time from different social psychologists, especially Fritz Heider who played a major role in producing the theory in 1958. Heider wrote about attribution theory in his book called The Psychology of Interpersonal Relationships. External attribution is when behavior is altered by influences outside of your control. Internal attribution is caused from an inside factor that falls within your control. Your behavior is not influenced and you feel responsible.
The just war theory is a traditional doctrine put together in previous times, used to justify the rights and wrongs of countries going to war, by using ethical standing and moral backgrounds. This theory states that if two countries were to go to war, they should do so for the right reasons and conduct it in a manner where human rights are not violated.
The point of Just War Theory is to give an understanding of the correct way to deal with conflict situations. It just applies to states, and not to people. Just War Theory provides a helpful system to people and political groups to use for their examinations of possible wars. The theory is not proposed to justify wars but rather to counteract them, by demonstrating that going to war with the exception of in certain constrained conditions isn't right, and accordingly persuade states to discover different methods for settling clashes.
From the psycho-dynamic perspective Alice's failure is caused by an unconscious motive that drives her to fail. (McLeod, 2013) Her failure in math has a cause that is most likely because of failures or feelings of failure that she has had in the past that are now manifesting themselves and causing her to stop studying. Alice's id or primitive desires for immediate satisfaction are taking over and causing her to stop studying for math and instead do things that she can do without feeling bad about herself. This perspective is lacking the outside forces that are in play because it doesn't consider how the mothers lack of success could factor into Alice's failures.
The text defines self-serving bias as the tendency to perceive oneself favorably. This bias leads us to believe that we are immune to the influences that affect the rest of humanity. In the self-serving bias, our successes are attributed to internal causes (effort or ability), while our failures are attributed to external factors (bad luck). Time and again, experimenters have found that people readily accept credit when told they have succeeded, yet attribute failure to such external factors as bad luck or the problem's inherent "impossibility." Imagine getting a promotion. Most of us will feel that this success is due to hard work, intelligence, dedication, and similar internal factors. But if you are fired, well obviously your boss wouldn't know a good thing if it were staring her in the face. The self-serving bias has been demonstrated countless times: the majority of Americans believe they are smarter and better looking than average; most drivers (even those hospitalized for accidents) believe themselves more skilled than the av...
This idea allows for justice to be measured by an equation, each person’s share of something must be justified by some relevant difference, making the equation equal. Each person should receive exactly what is proportional to what they put in. If you work an hour longer than someone then you should receive pay for one more hour. This is equal because you are being compensated exactly for the work you put in and the other person is not shorted in any way because they did not work that extra hour therefore should not receive the extra pay. This theory allows for impartiality when making a decision, it is not based on justice because of your moral character or consequence of your action it is based on equal justice for all based
Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual's behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. That determination depends largely on three factors: distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency. Our perceptions of people differ from our perceptions of inanimate objects.
Justice is about giving someone what he deserves (Heywood, 2012). According to Heywood(2012), “Justice is a moral standard of fairness and impartiality…” (Heywood, 2012, p. 33). Liberal theory of justice is based on a belief of equality (Heywood, 2012). Equal opportunity means that employment and services should be equally accessible for everyone. The two principles of justice are stand for to match society`s judgements about what is just and unjust (Farrelly, 2004).