Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried

985 Words2 Pages

“I survived, but it's not a happy ending. I was a coward. I went to the war.” The Things They Carried, written by Tim O’Brien, provides the reader with perplexing contradictions, just like the one above, throughout the entirety of the novel. O’Brien questions everything from what it truly means to be a “man,” to what it means to tell a “true” war story. Many of the ideas O’Brien tries to imbibe on his readers are further explained in literature. More specifically, poetry. Poets Felix Pollak, Denise Levertov, and Yusef Komunyakaa all assimilate elements of O’Brien’s beliefs and views on war into their own work.

As ironic as it may seem, O’Brien felt that he was a coward for going to war. Despite the preconceptions of bravery and violence being coexistent, O’Brien believes that real bravery and courage occur when a man or woman makes an “unpopular,” but honest decision. When someone makes a decision true to their own moral compass, that is when …show more content…

Soldiers did anything they could to take their mind away from the pain of war. Whether it be getting “high on Buddha grass,” or using crude humor to soften the pain, soldiers tried their best to move their minds to a place far, far away, void of suffering. When Curt Lemon, in The Things They Carried, died, his peers coped with the pain of losing a friend in strange ways. After stepping on a mine, Lemon was blown to pieces, leaving him scattered on a tree nearby. Instead of mourning the loss of a good friend, the group began to sing “Lemon Tree,” a popular song during the Vietnam war, while they picked up his disembodied corpse. This kind of gross use of crude humor is the exact kind of escape Komunyakaa describes in his poem. “miles away / machine guns can be heard. / Pretending we're somewhere else, / we play harder.” The men ignore their call to war, gunshots, and continue to allow their mind to wander to sweeter, safer

Open Document