Three Branches Of Government Essay

500 Words1 Page

It may be true that we have three branches of government, but they are not truly separate. Each one overlaps the others slightly to create a system that works cohesively without dominating one another. This was explained in depth by Madison in the federalist papers, where he argues that it is impossible for the government to work as intended unless there is some overlap between the powers given to each branch. However, he also states that the overlap must not interfere with each branches ability to do their job. If each branch had its own powers with no ability to check each other, then each branch would eventually begin to increase their power with nothing to hinder them which is the exact opposite of what the framers want. The intentions of the framers is to have three branches of …show more content…

With the system built this way, Congress must rely on the others to complete their job which is to create and pass legislation. Once something has made it through Congress and ready for the public it still must be signed by the president before it can become a law. Additionally, once something has become a law, it must be in accordance with the Constitution and that is ultimately judged by the Supreme Court. The other branches don’t always agree with Congress, and throughout history we have seen disagreements over cooperation between them and another branches. This can have many forms, from the president vetoing (or plans to) a bill, to disagreement on policy and budget proposals. With the Supreme Court, Congress doesn’t always agree when they rule a law to have been unconstitutional. The fighting doesn't always occur between branches either, members within Congress may not agree with the work of the rest of the body as a whole along with what is being planned with the president as we see now

Open Document