This Is Water: Synthesize the Essays by Freire and Wallace

1267 Words3 Pages

“This is Water” is an essay that originated from a commencement speech that was delivered by David Foster Wallace at the Kenyon College on May 21, 2005 (Wallace 14). Wallace’s speech has gained a lot of acknowledgment because of its practical advice that navigate day-to day adult life. Additionally, the speech seems to be prominent as it contains various advices that one can put into account in day to day life. The main subject of the entire speech is to bring the entire graduating student’s attention to their negative thoughts. Additionally, it urges them to reform these types of patterns such that they involuntarily justify other people’s actions with compassion and confidence rather than pessimism. The aim of the entire speech is to promote people to look for the best in the world around them instead of resorting to world hating thought patterns (Wallace 14). He asserts that the genuine value of liberal arts education is learning on various ways in order to become aware of how one chooses to think. This is due to the fact that the entire mindfulness helps to bring freedom and vitality.

On the other hand, Paulo Freire is another author who had similar opinion with David Foster. For instance, in his essay “The banking concept of education”, he tries to condemn the current belief about education (Bhattacharya 236). Normally, he criticizes the traditional type of education (Bhattacharya 236). He strongly supports his own new and somewhat radical notions about how he believes education should be carried out. His ideas about education assume students as empty tins where teachers are supposed to deposit all the information they can be in a position to deposit. This is a situation where students obtain the information, file it and st...

... middle of paper ...

... remove their negative thoughts and they should not rely on teachers alone. They should learn from the teacher while he or she learns from the entire students”.

To sum up, it can be evidenced that both authors have used various strategies to persuade or appeal to the entire audience. For instance, Wallace has used logos to appeal to his audience rational abilities. The logo comes in form of stories that exemplify the choices individuals must make on how to view familiar situations. He has also used pathos and ethos in the entire speech. On the other hand, Freire have also made use of these strategies, he has used logos, pathos and ethos to persuade the readers or audience’s emotions. Both authors’ writing skills show their abilities to thoroughly converse their purpose to the reader communicate their ideas in a clear and persuasive manner.

Open Document