Theories On Punishment And Respondent Behaviors

602 Words2 Pages

Scientists in the recent past have made several innovations in the field of medicine that solve clinical problems. Baer argues that whenever there is a new innovation there is usually a delight and the new innovation is highly applauded by the people. He mentions that when a drug is undergoing research, it goes through many processes including being used in lab animals and collecting different results. Baer argues that children need to be punished in selective ways to ensure that they grow up to be wonderful children (Baer, 1958). However, he wonders if the same results when collecting research in medicine will be applauded by the communities. This is because different people will have different responses. For example, Behaviors of that show interest include both respondent and operant behaviors. Respondent behaviors are indicated by antecedent stimuli. However, he continues to state that punishment is the most effective way to remove behaviors. Clinical problems, he states are like that. Nevertheless he disagrees with the notion that punishment builds on good behavior once it eliminates bad behavior. It can be used to shape ones behavior and correct them but not to make the person upright. However, when a behavior escapes punishment, it is likely to grow in detail. This means that is a behavior is not punished it is likely to grow and …show more content…

I agree with Baer’s opinion that behaviors need to be punished to produce upright morals for generations. It is through punishment that a parent will reduce the need to punish her child more at any time in their life. However, many parent’s, when punishing their children put much emphasis on the punishment itself rather than the behavior that caused the punishment (Family Education, 2015). Punishment need to be embraced and applauded by the community when a new punishment technique is brought about by the experts as it only serves to create a global morally upright

Open Document