Theme Of War In Regeneration

1082 Words3 Pages

War can be defined as “A state of conflict between societies”. It was stated by Richard Gabriel “Nations customarily measure the 'costs of war ' in dollars, lost production, or the soldiers killed or wounded; rarely do military establishments attempt to measure the costs of war in terms of individual human suffering.” In counter position – one may personally define war as the human suffering from conscious decisions of countries. The implications of war are conveyed through numerous characters, triggering flashbacks of events that affect the psychological state of the soldiers. Regeneration is told through the main protagonist Rivers; Megan Smith suggests that Rivers is a psychiatrist who is used to authorise the reader to gain a further …show more content…

Therefore, in general, critics both are different genres of literature on different times written. Meaning, it presents us with a contrast that shows the different presentation on the implications of war.

‘Regeneration’ by Pat Barker was first published in 1991 and is an anti-war novel that examines how soldiers at this time could develop psychosomatic conditions from the implications of war presented in the text more graphically compared to an older text from the critiques lack of understanding of mental health. At Craiglockhart, Willard (who is brought to Rivers) stated that he is in fact paralysed. Although, because of Rivers successful advancement in psychological progress, the attitude to Willard’s condition is changed - “paralysis is no use to a coward Mr. Willard. A coward needs his legs”. This can show that “Willard” was actually never able to grasp the true fact that his illness was a mental problem rather than physical, …show more content…

The audience is able to see an insight into the effect on the characters’ from trench warfare on their psyches – Freudian theory that questions the different part of the mind/psyche, less graphically than a newer version of the World War One. Modern critics (John Stokes and Tony Howard) argue that ‘Vietnam transformed’ the British citizens ‘regarded wars past and present’. Firstly, ‘Journey’s End’ was mostly applied to reduce or relieve possible signs of worry or hysteria. A key character, Hibbert, is commonly used by Sheriff to show the implications that war could have on grown men. He explains to Stanhope that he can no longer cope with the war and then approaches Stanhope wanting to “go sick”. This could be argued as perfectly acceptable due to his current mental state later presented with modern critics and audiences in conjunction with this. However, it does not fit the theme of masculinity to audiences at the time the play was first performed. Sheriff uses a descriptive language to describe the mental state, Hibbert, who stands with lowered head and eyes “tightly screwed up”, “Hibbert stands quivering in front of Stanhope” and this presents the audience with the surreal implications it had to the soldiers’ mental capability and state. But, Stanhope was still

Open Document