Theme Of Colonialism In The Tempest

848 Words2 Pages

In her essay “Shakespeare's Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism,” Deborah Willis argues that the play takes on a much more complex and complete identity concerning the aristocracy of colonialism, and she presents the idea that Caliban as the “other” (Willis, p.277) isn’t inherently wrong but rather misguided in readings. While her article brings up important issues concerning the reading of The Tempest, she ignores the vastness and all-consuming nature of colonialism. Her essay helped me to conclude that I perceive The Tempest as not only being solely about colonialism, but all of the issues featured in the play being tied back to colonialism, including those that Willis emphasizes aren’t as important or are ill-founded. Willis argues …show more content…

Class war and colonialism are always linked closely together. The rich receive or take by force the land, and the poor are left scraps or have to pay their own wages to have land. Antonio presented as the true villain and Prospero fighting against his brother also brings up the issue of power staying in families or at least within close confines of the same type of people—aristocrats. Willis describes this as “the reinforcement and expansion of the royal hegemony” (p.279). This is also exhibited when Prospero marries Miranda off to Ferdinand to keep power within his family. Shakespeare might have been making commentary on his own country’s system of government rather than Indigenous’ people. This system literally breeds corruptness, abuse, and a distrust towards politicians. The total breakdown of Antonio and “aristocratic solidarity” (.p.277) simulates how colonialism occurs, but Willis doesn’t tie in the aftermath of this catastrophe. What came first, the class hierarchy or racism, eugenics, and misogyny? Or can one not exist without the

Open Document