Summary Of The Two Fold Thought Of Deleuze And Guattari

1529 Words4 Pages

The Two-Fold Thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and Animations

Charles J. Stivale, a scholar in French literary and cultural studies, tries to articulate Deleuze and Guattari's philosophical concepts with practical studies on culture, analyzing films, cyberspace, and Cajun dance. Although he says that the goal of the book is to provide "an initial orientation" to Deleuze and Guattari's collaborative works, it is not a simple job at all for those innocent of Deleuzean concepts to follow the flow of his thought (ix). He provides short explications of the concepts and quotations from Deleuze and Guattari's books before his application, but only the readers, who are familiar with Delezean concepts, seem to be able to articulate …show more content…

He deals with "cyberpunk" fictions and Cajun music and dance practices. He considers that science fictions are privileged expression of the different modes of becoming, which evolves "from animal, vegetable, and mineral becomings to becomings of bacteria, viruses, molecules, and things imperceptible" (A Thousand Plateau, 248). Focusing on the process of becoming, he analyzes Rudy's, John Shirley's and William Gibson's fictions. Facing the recurring modes of the loss of the subject and of the intensity of participating in multiple subjectivities, he encounters the problematic of cyborg again. Juxtaposing shortly Donna Haraway's dream of cyborg image to three sets of images from the three fictions, he moves into what Deleuze and Guattari calls "becoming-woman." He considers "becoming-woman" a "particular means of access to 'an entire politics of becomings-animal, as well as a politics of sorcery, which is elaborated in assemblages that are either those of the family nor of religion nor of the State'"(135, quoted from A Thousand Plateau). This shift, actually a reduction of the problematic, seems improper. Stivale sticks to what really does not matter in the Deleuze and Guattari's logic. It is not only a matter of women-subjectivity but also overall problem of subjectivity. Later in this book, from the interview with Guattari, …show more content…

Reading the interview with Guattari is an excellent experience, by which we can see Guattari's politically radical stance and his view on Freud and Lacan. As an appendix, he provides a translation of Deleuze's unpublished essay, "How Do We Recognize Structuralism?" (1967) This way of conclusion reflects Stivale's intention of writing n-1 dimensions in order not to come up with one conclusion at the end of a long discussion of the

Open Document