The Tempest Usurpation

860 Words2 Pages

Usurpation is a common theme in Shakespeare’s plays, for example in Hamlet or in Macbeth, where the king gets maliciously killed. However, what makes The Tempest stand out is the fact that it is not a tragedy but a comedy – and Shakespeare included usurpation as an important theme in a humorous play. From the very beginning, the theme is shown through the story of Prospero’s past, where Antonio seizes the dukedom from Prospero. The reason for this is that Prospero’s ‘art were all [his] study’ and as he was not performing his job, his brother used the opportunity to ‘hurry [them] aboard a bark’ in a ‘rotten carcass of a butt’. Although Prospero calls Antonio ‘false’ a number of times, there is a number of oxymorons used in Act 1 Scene 2 where …show more content…

‘This island’s mine, by Sycorax, my mother’ raises issues about authority and colonialism (Goold, 2007). The play suggests that Prospero has taken Caliban as his slave after the dispute. Caliban does not think Prospero is in charge of him, which could even be seen by the way he addresses Prospero. One of the simplest signs of respect in Shakespeare’s times was shown by addressing a single superior with the plural form of the second-person pronoun; ‘ye’ or ‘you’. Superiors were entitled to address their inferiors as ‘thou’ or ‘thee’, although ‘thou’ could also be used as a form of intimacy (Norbrook, 1998). When Caliban speaks to Prospero, he addresses him with ‘thou’ – “When thou cam'st first, / Thou strok'st me and madest much of me,” – therefore Caliban thinks of himself as equal as or more powerful than Prospero. However, it could also be seen that he uses ‘thou’ in the informal way, and therefore could be seeing Prospero as a fatherly figure, and this would mean he does see Prospero as one above him and in possession of power. Caliban also challenges Prospero’s authority, even after Prospero treats him like dirt, saying that because Prospero taught him the language, he can now curse him. It could be said that because of the way Prospero has been treated in the past, he now feels like someone else must suffer through what he has suffered. He …show more content…

Sebastian almost sees it as his duty, and the only thing which worries him is his conscience afterwards. The effect of usurpation on conscience can be seen very clearly in Macbeth, where he suffers from illusions, as does his wife. Therefore, it would be clear that Shakespeare has already revised the effects of usurpation on conscience in his earlier plays. Yet here, Antonio proclaims he has no conscience, in a jokingly way. As conscience was seen as almost a Godly thing, Antonio’s atheistic statement shows him as almost devilish and in the absence of God. Sebastian says ‘As thou got’st Milan, I’ll come by Naples’ – so murder in order to obtain power is seen again as a thing of duty, on which Sebastian and Antonio

Open Document