The Similarities And Differences Between Marx And Weber's Analysis Of The Origins And Characteristics Of Capitalism?

1174 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Karl marx and max weber differences and similarities on sociology

Discuss the similarities and differences between Marx 's and Weber’s analyses of the origins and characteristics of capitalism

This essay will compare and contrast the key similarities and differences between analyses proposed by Marx and Weber in relation to the origins and characteristics of capitalism. Marx and Weber are recognised as two key sociological theorists; it is argued by many that there are very prominent similarities between these theorists work, both examined very similar ideas in sociology however drew two noticeably different conclusions.

I will discuss the similarities and differences of the ideas contributed by these two influential sociologists in order to compare their individual perceptions of society. Gathering sufficient …show more content…

Marx gained insight from the work of German philosopher, Hegel, and therefore adopted the concept of base and superstructure- the base existing as the means of production and the superstructure as anything not directly relating to production such as law and culture. The base being not just a component of the economy but the entire base of productive relationships; and the superstructure being a changing and developing component based on society’s activities that the base relations determine. (Rigby, 1998 pg. 176). Marx also took strong influence from classical political economists such as Adam Smith, creator of the labour theory of value- this is defined by (Investopedia 2015) as an economic theory that specifies ‘the value of a product or service is dependent upon the labour used in its production’ meaning that ‘the real cost of a product was determined by how much labour went into it’ as stated by (Evans, 2007 pg. 96, 97). From these key ideas and other sources, Marx was strongly influenced and consequently created his own dominant ideas about the overall …show more content…

In the opinion of Marx, the means of production is significant in the characteristics of what shapes society; he credited the means used by workers to make products as central to the conducting of the Western society. He advocated that as workers gained less control of their products, it was their labour that was forced to be sold therefore compelling them to be alienated from their work due to their inevitable exploitation. Therefore as capitalism expands, competition would increase inevitably meaning that power falls to a smaller minority- leaving an undeniable division of two classes ‘the property owners and the property-less workers’

Show More
Related

  • The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... his ideals and theories were influenced by the popular philosophical circles present throughout Europe. Saint Simon was a noble Frenchman whose spin on socialism featured a government ran by scientists. Proudon was another radical thinker that influenced Marx. Proudon’s book, “What is Property” centers around privatization of property and comes to the conclusion that the factors of production is theft. When Marx moved to France, he was introduced to many different socialist viewpoints which inspired his argument known as historical materialism. This argument stated that the world is changed not by ideas but by actual, physical, material activity and practice and can be connected to his theme of injustice of exploitation. This is why in the Manifesto he speaks out against child labor and the violations of the proletariat family by the bourgeoisie.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx’s Theory of the Capitalist Economic System

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx’s was a German philosopher, economist and evolutionary socialist born in Germany on May 5th 1818. His theories mostly consisted of the capitalist economic system. Marx’s attended the University of Bonn and University of Berlin. He is widely recognized for his theory of on the class system which included the concepts of base and super-structure. Marx’s theory of the class system is well exhibited by the documentary film, Class Dismissed: How TV Frames the Working Class.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism

    1808 Words  | 4 Pages

    Based on this segment from Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, it appears that the primary focus of the work was to refute the proposal of “”superstructure” theorists” (Weber in Calhoun 2012: 299), by providing examples to indicate that a capitalist economy is an unnatural social system, and does not unfold as these theorists claim. Weber focuses primarily on Benjamin Franklin as a proponent of Capitalism, (seemingly)

    Read More

  • How Class Influences Identities

    393 Words  | 1 Pages

    Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) and Max Weber (1864 - 1920) both recognised that economic categories played a large part in social class structure. Nineteenth Century history plays an important part in understanding how class influenced identities. The Industrial revolution was changing the structure of the communities, the rich or landowners having a far better standard of living with better education, health care, property ownership and power than the poor. The working class would have a daily struggle to survive. The change in Trade Unions meant that the working class had a voice, helping to push their needs forward, looking for better standards of living and working conditions. Marx's concept of class was based around the production of goods. The emerging owners of these goods, or capital, were known as the ruling class. Marxism would define only two classes, the ruling class and the working class. The influence on identity of these two class structures would be very relevant in those days. The working class would earn a wage from the production of the goods but the ruling class would sell these for a profit and exploit the workers. The two classes were on two different levels of wealth, property ownership and social standing and they would struggle to mix, they were dependent on each other but the rewards would be unevenly matched.

    Read More

  • Weber And Weber's Theory Of Protestantism

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    1). Weber and Marx views differ when it comes to their interpretations about the origins and dynamics of capitalism, Weber’s view focuses on the Protestant reformation and the spirit of capitalism in the west and how “the widespread influence of Protestantism after the reformation helped explain why full blown rational capitalism developed where and when it did” (Mcintosh pg. 115). Although he doesn’t believe that Protestantism caused for the creation of capitalism he does believe that Calvinism a branch of Protestantism plays a roll due to the effects it shaped upon these people and their protestant ethics. Mcintosh helps to explain that “in such a time the religious forces which express themselves through such channels are the decisive influences in the formation of national character” (Mcintosh pg. 122). In other words due to the asceticism and the spirit of capitalism amongst these religious followers they abstained from various worldly pleasures to obtain their spiritual “calling”. In decreasing pleasures and increasing work, production and profits, they were hopeful that they were increasing their chances of going to heaven due to their belief about predestination which states “in theology, the doctrine that all events have been willed by God. John Calvin interpreted biblical predestination to mean that God willed eternal damnation for some people and salvation for others” (www.wikipedia.com). Thus they followed the doctrine precisely, which they believed could possibly decrease their chances of being the individuals who were damned to hell. Although Wesley argued “I fear that wherever riches have increased, the essence of religion has decreased in the same proportion. So although the form of religion remains, the spirit i...

    Read More

  • Marx Vs. Weber And Weber's Theory Of Capitalism

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx focused on economy, not history. In contrast Waber interested ideas and history about how capitalism emerged. Marx ruling class has the prestige respect and nobility. Weber democratic, people elect their representatives, Ideas and innovations. Weber emphasized that social class is shaped by demand and supply. Waber; the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, this is where pure form of capitalism emerged because of hard work and calling. In contrast Marx; believed that religion is the drug of people. It means that it keeps them with self-satisfaction. He also, argued that religion withhold peoples or social development and mislead the poor people. Marx: favor Waber and argued that Capitalism was progressive at the first time. It replaced the other systems dominated by kings, and churches. It pushes back illiteracy, and lack of free market. It emerged to make money all around the world and generate wealthier. Also, it enables persons to consume goods. After all, it transformed system of exploitation and creates social classes and inequality. That is why he proposed to replace capitalist with a system dominated by the working class. On the other hand, Waber think that there is no way to change

    Read More

  • Karl Weber's Views Of Max Weber And Karl Marx

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    Weber and Marx’s essentially took different approaches to break down the origins, workings and the direction capitalism was heading.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    Weber, on the other hand, tried to look at the macro-sociological phenomenon in his explanation. Weber felt that there is just more than one explanation for the causes of change. Marx’s perspective was not based on the conflict of ideas, but rather on the conflict of classes. This conflict is the result of a new mode of production. According to Marx, history would consist of epochs of modes of production.

    Read More

  • Kuyper Against Marx

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Marx’s opinion, the cause of poverty has always been due to the struggle between social classes, with one class keeping its power by suppressing the other classes. He claims the opposing forces of the Industrial Age are the bourgeois and the proletarians. Marx describes the bourgeois as a middle class drunk on power. The bourgeois are the controllers of industrialization, the owners of the factories that abuse their workers and strip all human dignity away from them for pennies. Industry, Marx says, has made the proletariat working class only a tool for increasing the wealth of the bourgeoisie. Because the aim of the bourgeoisie is to increase their trade and wealth, it is necessary to exploit the worker to maximize profit. This, according to Marx, is why the labor of the proletariat continued to steadily increase while the wages of the proletariat continued to steadily decrease.

    Read More

  • Differentiating Marx and Rousseau

    2202 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relat...

    Read More

  • Consciousness In Karl Marx's The German Ideology

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    For Marx in "The German Ideology" people 's ideas and ideologies are conditioned by the historical formation of powers of production and relations of production. This is the ground for Marx 's famous distinction between economical base; which includes the forces of production, relations of production and division of labor and the "superstructure" which includes culture, ideology, religion etc. For Marx, the superstructure is determined by the material base, and not as the Idealist philosophers would have

    Read More

  • The Iron Cage and Max Weber

    582 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once capitalism came about, it was like a machine that you were being pulled into without an alternative option. Currently, whether we agree or disagree, for example if you want to survive you need to have a job and you need to make money. Weber believed that social actions were becoming based on efficiency instead of the old types of social actions, which were based on lineage or kinship. Behavior had become dominated by goal-oriented rationality and less by tradition and values. According to Web...

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and Capitalism

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx, in the Capital, developed his critique of capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and its development throughout history. The critique contains Marx’s most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. Although it was written in 1850s, its values still serve an important purpose in the globalized world and maintains extremely relevant in the twenty-first century.

    Read More

  • Comparing and Contrasting Sociological Theorists Max Weber, Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx

    1584 Words  | 4 Pages

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx, and Max Weber are all important characters to be studied in the field of Sociology. Each one of these Sociological theorists, help in the separation of Sociology into its own field of study. The works of these three theorists is very complex and can be considered hard to understand but their intentions were not. They have their similarities along with just as many of their differences.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx's Advantages And Disadvantages Of Capitalism

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    Karl Marx was a philosopher, a sociologist, economist, and a journalist. His work in economics laid a foundation for the modern understanding of distribution of labor, and its relation to wealth generation. His theories about the society, economic structure and politics, which is known as Marxism led to him developing social classes. He later on showed how social classes were determined by an individual’s position in relation to the production process, and how they determine his or her political views. According to Karl Marx, capitalism was a result of the industrial revolution. Capitalism is a system that has been founded on the production of commodities for the purpose of sale. Marx defined the

    Read More

More about The Similarities And Differences Between Marx And Weber's Analysis Of The Origins And Characteristics Of Capitalism?

Open Document