The Shock Doctrine is an ideology that surfaced about 50 years ago and it is the idea that the government uses fear from conflicts to distract and over encumber citizens so that certain laws that would normally be denied can be legislated. This happens in the wake of disasters and conflicts when citizens are too emotionally and physically battered to put up any resistance to the laws being passed by the government. Generally the laws being passed during this time of conflict revolve around Milton Friedman’s neoliberal idea of a free market and that there should be little restrictions that surround corporations. These laws give corporations vast amounts of economic freedom and cause them and their business to economically sky rocket. The Shock Doctrine has been used to forward legislation by several governments such as; Chile, Russia, Britain, and even the United States.
Naomi Klein calls the Shock Doctrine an ideology, but what makes it an ideology. To answer this question ideology must be defined; sociologists would define ideology as knowledge that has been distorted by social, economic, or political interests. The Shock Doctrine uses the crippling capability of fear and panic to obscure the population’s beliefs causing them either to not stop or support government’s legislature that they normally would not. For example, the United States used 9/11 to push through neoliberal reforms and privatize the U.S. military, this is not a regulation that would have passed in a non-chaotic time and the government used the fear and confusion of the people to pass this reform (Klein, 2007).
The Shock Doctrine is very apparently there to benefit the upper class of societies and harm the lower class. In Russia for example, Boris Yeltsin us...
... middle of paper ...
...nfusion of her people to pass bills and laws that would otherwise not be passed.
The Shock Doctrine is an ideology that is based off of the fear and confusion of a people; it allows governments to abuse their power and take advantage of its people in a time of crisis. This tactic has been used over the past 50 years and is even being used today to pass free market neoliberal reforms. These reforms have been at the cost of the lower class and have aided the corporate class in the quest for more money countless times with prime examples such as; Pinochet in Chile, Thatcher in Britain, Yeltsin in Russia, and now currently the natural gas industry in Ukraine. The Shock Doctrine is ideology fueled off of the terror of people it gives the corporate class more power; but the question that you should ask yourself then is, do our corporations make their money off of fear?
I am choosing to write my essay focusing on Nancy Pelosi, arguably one of the most influential politicians of her time, and certainly one of the outstanding ladies of the political world. Not only was she the first woman to serve as Speaker of the House, she also was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame at Seneca Falls. She ranks with the most consequential speakers, certainly in the last 75 years.”(Burstyn) Nancy Pelosi was born on March 26th in 1940 and she has represented San Francisco for approximately 29 years. This however is not by far her most notable achievement, speaker of the house aside, under her guidance the 111th US Congress was said to be the most productive in the history of its conception. This means that she was able to oversee the 111th Congress in a manner that minimized the terrible three, collective action problems, commitment problems, and coordination problems. These problems all come down to the inability to make decisions, and are extremely ponderous to efficiency. She ran it as famously, even though the house was so divided when she took the pos...
She argued and fought for all women to have access and with it freedom to choose when and or if they wanted to be mothers.
paved the way for religious freedom. She was a great leader in the cause for
Public conflict may be triggered by several causes. For one, it may result from the agitation of several groups who believe that what is morally right is violated. Despite the reason behind, agitators seek to challenge the society so that their proposal for social change is accepted. Hence, it is important to understand the reasons why agitators use different strategies to advance their cause and how establishments can control them. For the purposes of this paper, the Boston Tea Party will be analyzed in light of the concept of agitation and establishment. Further, the strategies of the agitators and the establishment will also be provided.
Rather, it contends that when government is unrestrained in the form of totalitarianism, as exemplified by the Party of Oceania, it can by nature exist only to serve itself. This argument serves as Orwell’s warning against the dangers of totalitarianism; it is so corrupting a force that it can hide behind claims of good intentions, but ultimately exists only to accumulate its own power. Furthermore, since a totalitarian drive for power constitutes a total control of its citizenry and a political structure that necessitates its existence, as shown by the military strategy of the Party, Orwell warns that once a truly totalitarian state is in place, there is no possible way to overthrow it or turn back from it. Ultimately, Orwell sees a government that is so distorted it has become completely self-serving as the largest threat, defining his view of totalitarianism and the themes of his
The war was over. The last cry of help had been heard and peace was supposedly coming to the United States. But everyone was wrong. An ideological war which prompted mass paranoia known as the Red Scare had spread through the US. It began in 1919 and ended in 1921. Red Scare was the label given to the actions of legislation, the race riots, and the hatred and persecution of "subversives" and conscientious objectors during that period of time.
Shirley Chisholm’s political career arguable began when she joined the Seventeenth Assembly District Democratic Club in Bedford-Stuyvesant. At the age of 34, she was elected as the vice president of the Bedford-Stuyvesant Political League (BSPL). After she ran for the presidency of this league, she eventually quit both the BSPL and the 17AD. In the winter of 1960, she got back into politics. Chisholm joined the National Organization for Women (NOW) immediately after it was established. She and Thomas R. Jones organized the Unity Democratic Club (UDC) to overthrow the white Democratic party. By 1965, she became New York state’s assemblywoman. She actually won by a landslide. In 1968, she is elected into Congress. As a congresswoman, she passed 8 bills. This is highly uncommon since first time congress members are knows as silent members, and they are to vote with their party. Chisholm was very unorthodox with her methods, and she was not afraid to speak her mind. One of the bills she passed setup New York’s first unemployment insurance and social
...t happen even in Hollywood. You don’t have a revolution in which you love your enemy, and you don’t have a revolution in which you are begging the system of exploitation to integrate you into it. Revolutions overturn systems. Revolutions destroy systems.”
As a reference for comparison, the military state of Oceania controls the Outer Party, wealth, and Inner Party through the use of war. In their society the citizens of the Outer Party were described as “a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity, all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans, perpetually working, fighting, triumphing, persecuting - three hundred million people all with the same face” (Orwell 64). They only had the thoughts that the government gave them, which created no possibility of the people revolting. The only thing the Outer Party knew was how to love the government. They had no entertainment, everything was made for war, and if not then it went to antique shops which were illegal to go to (Orwell n.pag). The main focus of the country was war, and everything else was considered nonsense. This creation of non-war shops also helped the Party trap people who were resilient, because they were able to catch them buying non-war goods from illeg...
During Adolf Hitler’s reign of terror in Germany, he had tried to form a totalitarian society based on hate and in the end of it all, it did not survive. “The Government ran and censored the media. All forms of communication were liable to interference from above and could, and were, heavily censored. This removes freedom of speech, therefore enabling the government to influence popular opinion via propaganda and false news messages”(Was Hitler’s Germany A Totalitarian State? 1). Similar to Orwell’s “Big Brother” society, a form of “thought-police” was created to fight against all resistance to this society. In Germany, “the secret police was publicised, its role was to find enemies of the state. These people would quite often be publicly humiliated or even tortured. Such actions making people think twice before questioning the state. Likewise the police and Gestapo had the authority to remove people from their homes and send them, often without trial, to concentration camps” (Was Hitler’s Germany A Totalitarian State? 1). O’Brien’s way of thinking was also similar to Hitler’s in that they wanted to eliminate all freethinkers. “There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There
been seen through nations seeking to control the populous, such as in Germany during World
Paragraph 1: History: Explain Revisionism Its Process How it affects the present. Paragraph 2: Psychology: Artificial Scarcity: Affects Human Behavior Maslow Theory of Human Behavior. Paragraph 3: God: Big Brother has taken the place of God: Omnipotent and Omniscient, and is under the control of the party. Among the many themes expressed in the novel 1984 by George Orwell, the most interesting and frightening is the concept of creating an alternative reality to control a mass population. The Inner Party stays in power by shaping the thoughts and opinions of the masses and it does this by creating a reality where everything suits whatever it is the party needs to be believed.
“A totalitarian system can only maintain itself by means of terror and a system of informers while the masses are inert, but once the masses move into action it is the beginning of the end.”
The wealth, power, and prestige of the bourgeoisie, acquired mostly from their control of institutions, industries, and means of production, enabled them to force upon the proletariat their economic, political, and religious ideologies. These are the same ideologies "used to maintain certain social relations" (Eagleton 466). These very ideologies are what "make the masses loyal to the very institutions that are the source of their exploitation" (Tischler 16). Once the proletariat ceases to believe in or abide by those ideologies, revolt is inevitable, and the moment it occurs, so does the destruction or alteration of a single controlling and tyrannical power altogether. Thus, it can be said that "the bourgeoisie reign is doomed when economic conditions are ripe and when a working class united by solidarity, aware of its common interests and energized by an appropriate system of ideas, confronts its disunited antagonists" (Rideneir).