The Scopes Trial

463 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The american the reluctant fundamentalist

The Scopes Trial was a major milestone for Religious Conservatives. The Fundamentalists believed that the Bible is without errors, and to follow the idea’s of Darwin is defying God’s word. William Jennings Bryan was a politician who based his political speeches form Biblical teachings. He became an advocate for the common man and Fundamentalists. When a public school teacher was arrested for the teaching of evolution, Bryan was the prosecutor for the highly publicized trial. Clarence Darrow was the defense attorney. Bryan, like most Fundamentalists, believed that the Bible is to be taken literally and not questioned. Darrow called Bryan to the stand and asked him if he believed that there are only 24 hours in the day. Bryan answered yes. Darrow

Show More
Related

  • Abington V. Schempp Case Study

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...gain ruled in favor of the Establishment Clause. These cases include Murray v. Baltimore School Board, Epperson v. Arkansas, and Stone v. Graham. It also set the grounds for the case, Lemon v. Kurtzman, which set up the “Lemon Test” for deciding if a religious function is Constitutional or not.

    Read More

  • The Trial: Difference Of Gender In The Trial Of Thomas And Jane Weir

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many differences when it comes to gender within the trial of Thomas and Jane Weir. Women were usually domestic workers within the household and society, doing jobs such as child-rearing, weaving, and roles of mother, sister, daughter, wife and caretaker in the community. Men were either seen as the husbands of the female witchcraft users or someone of an intense authority figure. “Sir Andrew Ramsay, Lord Abbotshall then Provost of Edinburgh” were all men with high statuses within the community in Edinburgh in which Thomas lived. Women during the time of witchcraft in Scotland came to be connected with the Devil by possession while most men do not have carnal knowledge of the work of the Devil himself

    Read More

  • Religion Versus Science in The Scopes Monkey Trial

    879 Words  | 2 Pages

    The stage was set in Dayton, Tennessee.  The leading actor in this show was a twenty five-year-old science teacher named John T. Scopes. Scopes was under the direction of advancing America.  The playbill read The Scopes “Monkey” Trial.  In 1925 John T. Scopes was encouraged to challenge the Butler Law.  This law had been passed by a small town in Dayton, Tennessee to prohibit teaching contra to those in the Bible. Teaching from an evolutionary text, Scopes broke the law and gained the attention of the National media.  The concentration of the media on the Scopes Trial effectively presented the contrasting ideas of a religious town and an evolving country.

    Read More

  • Literary Analysis of Bravery in The Crucible by Arthur Miller

    563 Words  | 2 Pages

    the court, and for saying “I say-I say – God is dead” (p.115). The day

    Read More

  • The Exclusionary Rule: Redefining the Crminal Justice System

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    Well written procedures, rules, and regulation provide the cornerstone for effectively implementing policies within the criminal justice system. During the investigational process, evidence collected is subjected to policies such as Search and Seizure, yet, scrutinized by the Exclusionary Rule prior to the judicial proceeding. Concurrent with criminal justice theories, evidence collected must be constitutionally protected, obtained in a legal and authorized nature, and without violations of Due Process. Although crime and criminal activities occur, applicability of policies is to ensure accountability for deviant behaviors and to correct potentially escalation within social communities It is essential the government address such deviant behavior, however, equally important is the protection of the accused which also must become a priority when investigating criminal cases.

    Read More

  • Abortion Essay - Roe v. Wade and Morality

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Michael Pearce Pfeifer in "Abandoning Error: Self-Correction by the Supreme Court," states the impact of Roe v. Wade on morals:

    Read More

  • Wrongfully Accused: A Lethal Mistake

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Corsicana, Texas Cameron Willingham and his family’s home was burned down the twenty-third of December is 1991. According to the report Cameron was asleep when the fire started and survived the accident with only a few injuries, as for his children they were not so lucky, they lost their lives to the tragic accident. At the time of the accident Cameron’s wife was buying presents for their children for Christmas. According to a witness and her Daughter Diane and Buffie from a few houses down went outside and saw Cameron screaming, “My babies are burning up!” Diane and Cameron tried countless attempts to rescue the girls from their room until the fire department could get there. According to the New Yorker “The house, in short, had been deliberately transformed onto a death trap.” According to the reports on December twenty-fourth and twenty-seventh of 1991 the fire was declared arson and they later decided to conduct a criminal investigation. Cameron was questioned by the investigators on December 31st and was then later arrested on January 8th of 1992 for the death his three daughters.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Scope Article

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    At the end of the day, is it necessary to own a pair of $170 shoes. Shoes are something that comes and goes, but personalities stay forever. In the Scope article, Should Eddie buy these sneakers, Eddie is trying to provide his mom reasons on why he should by the shoes, on the other hand, his mom is trying to persuade him not to and to buy something that will be benefit him beyond what the shoes will be able to.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of the Dred Scott Decision and The People Vs. Hall

    326 Words  | 1 Pages

    Both of these cases show the reader that the exact meaning of the lines in the Constitution that read "All men are

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.

    Read More

  • Roaring Twenties And The Great Gatsby

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1925, a teacher named John T Scopes was arrested for teaching the Theory of Evolution as this contradicted religion and their beliefs that God created the world.

    Read More

  • Prayer in Public Schools

    2069 Words  | 5 Pages

    In a particular trial, Wallace V. Jaffree, an argument arose concerning a one-minute “meditation or voluntary prayer” in public schools (Wallace V. Jaffree). George Wallace, a governor of Alabama, agreed with the “1981 Alabama Statute (16-1-20.1) authorizing [this] 1-minute period of silence in all public schools” (Wallace V. Jaffree). The District Court agreed with Wallace and “ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a State from establishing a religion” (Wallace V. Jaffree). In contrast, Appellee Ishmael Jaffree, a resident of Mobile County, Alabama objected this Alabama Statute. Since the one-minute prayer was voluntary, his children did not participate. They were then “exposed to ostracism from their peer group class members” for not participating (Wallace V. Jaffree). In the Wallace versus Jaffree trial, Jaffree has a stronger case because his complaints are justified through both the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the ideology of Separation of Church and State.

    Read More

  • Inherit the Wind: Religion vs. Science

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stanley Kramer's film, Inherit the Wind, examines a trial based on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee. Often referred to as "The Trial of the Century" (Scopes Trial Web Page), the Scopes trial illuminated the controversy between the Christian theory of creation and the more scientific theory of evolution. John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for illegally teaching evolutionism to his class. "The meaning of the trial emerged because it was seen as a conflict of social and intellectual values" (Scopes Trial Web Page). Kramer's film dramatizes this conflict between the Christian believers and the evolutionists in "Hillsboro, heavenly Hillsboro, the buckle on the Bible belt" (Inherit the Wind). Prosecutor Matthew Brady represents the values of fundamental Christianity while defense attorney Henry Drummond is the voice of reason and science. Although the two men have been good friends and partners in the past, the case in Hillsboro illuminates the difference in their values. Through the scene on the porch with Matthew Brady and Henry Drummond, director Stanley Kramer illustrates the incessant tug-of-war between religion and science. More specifically, camera angle and Drummond's metaphor of the "Golden Dancer" help deliver Kramer's belief in evolutionism.

    Read More

  • The Jones Case Summary

    1760 Words  | 4 Pages

    In reading the Jones case, it is apparent that there are many different ethical dilemmas present throughout the entire scenario, and not only do many of these dilemmas violate the social workers Code of Ethics, they also violate Laws and standards of practice (SOPs). While analyzing the ethical dilemmas, I kept in mind the core values of social work and thought of multiple different strategies in which I could apply these values to positively impact the Jones family and practice ethical behavior.

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Case of Andrea Yates

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Andrea Yates murder trial was one of the most highly publicized cases of 2001. Perplexing and complicated, it appealed to the public audience for various reasons. A mother methodically, drowns her five children in the family bathtub after her husband leaves for work. Was this an act of a cold calculating killer, or was this the act of a woman who lost touch with reality. Is this a case of medical neglect, and psychological dysfunctions, or is this a battle of ethics and deviant behavior exploiting medical and legal loop holes?

    Read More

More about The Scopes Trial

Open Document