More handpicked essays just for you.
Obsession of the story of The Rocking Horse Winner
How is materialism used in the rocking horse winner to display the theme of desire
The scarlet letter character analysis hester
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Obsession of the story of The Rocking Horse Winner
Similarities & Differences of “The Rocking Horse Winner” In the story “The Rocking Horse Winner,“ the author and film director use direct & indirect characterization, symbolism, and biblical allusion to illustrate the theme that family relationships are more important than wealth and high social status. In the book, Hester is described as an unloving parent. When reading further in the book there family doesn’t really show love towards one another. When other people come around such as company they turn into the most loving family. “She had bonny children, yet she felt they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them. And she felt she must cover up some fault in herself. Nevertheless, when her children were present, she always felt the center of her heart go hard” (379). Hester trying to hide her emotions, she is very resentful and isolated as a woman. “Only she herself knew that at the center of her heart was a hard little place that could not feel love, no, not for anybody” (379). Paul was just …show more content…
“I never told you, mother, that if I can ride my horse, and get there, then I’m absolutely sure oh absolutely! Mother, did I ever tell you? I’m lucky” (391). Paul starts gambling with Bassett at the horse race track. Paul is winning a lot of money, so he wants to help out his mother by giving her a thousand pounds per year for five years. She ends up wanting all of the money at once. The more Hester has, the more she wants. This is bad for Hester, because she lacks the quality required, certainly because she is greedy. Paul would ride his rocking horse to determine what horse would win the races. The rocking horse symbolized fear. Paul would ride his horse very petrifying, that he would leave people worried about him and that horse. It also, seemed as if Paul thrust out even into a much darker place than his rocking
There are situations during the first part of the Scarlet Letter where Hester responds to the community’s power differently. As Hester stood on the scaffold, babe in hand, community officials demanded she “Speak out the name!” (Ch. 3; Pg. 47). Though pressed with legitimate power, Hester refuses and withdraws from answering who the father of the sin-born baby is. The reader already begins to notice the strong spirit of Hester. The characterization of Hester continues to develop throughout this section when she “ … did not flee.” The adulterer’s inner strength to not withdraw is astonishing. Why not leave the people who just judged you and imprisoned you? Hester and Pearl lived “On the outskirts of the town … but not in close vicinity to any other habitation” (Ch. 4; Pg. 55). The mother decided to stay, but still withdrew from the community. Hester begins to do service for the poor as well as make clothing for a community that harshly judged her. She begins to embrace her position in this power imbalance by doing good deeds, and the narrator suggests that “None so ready as she to give of her little substance to every demand of poverty” (Ch. 13; Pg. 110). The view of Hester by the community changes towards the end of the book. Her “A” was now viewed to mean “able.” No longer did it mean it regular interpretation. Hester at first was on the negative spectrum of responses to power, but we see her embrace her position in the community in the third part of the
In the novel All the Pretty Horses by Cormac McCarthy, the author shows how important the roles of the horses are in the story and how they relate to John Grady, the protagonist of the novel. The horse has played an important role in the development of America. It has been a form of transportation, easy muscle, and companionship. In the Wild West, it was an essential resource for a cowboy to do his daily chores. McCarthy describes horses as spiritual and as resembling the human soul; meaning that horses came in many different forms. Horses are pretty, ugly, wild, tame, etc. in the story, they have so many different descriptions and different types of personality that they appear to resemble humans. In the story, John Grady is able to communicate with horses beyond a level normal people could. He could look into a horse's eyes and be able to see into its heart; because of this distinct relationship Grady is able to compare the world of horses to the world of humans. Throughout the novel, he learns that what he thinks of men and about his romantic idea of living in the world is completely false and wrong. Therefore, McCarthy's title shows that life can be full of change; and, at times, it can be cruel and ironic. Because of this, McCarthy's title shows how much a perspective can change when a man goes on an adventure and experiences things he did not experience before. Meaning that, McCarthy wanted readers to think before they read the book that life is pretty and easy, but after they read the book he wants the readers to know that life is not always how it seems.
Once he learns that luck brings money, the very component his mother yearns for, he goes on a mission with his trusty steed. He becomes violent hitting his wooden rocking horse with a whip and commands it, "'Now, take me to where there is luck! Now take me!'" (Lawerence 412). His obsession causes him to act out of character because the one items he cherishes has to endure the displaced frustration he has toward Hester. This shows how much he wants his mother to acknowledge his existence in her life. His goal in finding luck is to also find money in anticipation that Hester's search will cease forcing all of her attention on him. Paul not only loses his temperament but his childhood as well. He becomes preoccupied with gambling when it should be superheroes and sports. He rocks on his horse compulsively until he falls ill screaming out the winning horse's name: "'Malabar! It's Malabar!'" (Lawerence 412). As his prediction comes true, Hester collects the prize money, and Paul believes he has obtained the unobtainable. He hunts for her acceptance one last time asking, "'Over eighty thousand pounds! I call that lucky, don't you mother?'" (Lawerence 422). Hester replies, "'No, you never did'" (422), and he dies later that night without ever knowing his worth. She is unable to give him his dying wish of her
John Grady’s transformation from a broken family as well as abandoned by his father was unexpected. Growing up around friends who were also abandoned and no mentor or role model made his transition difficult. His love and passion for horses is strong as it was one of the few family traditions he held onto his entire life. His views on emotions and depth of relationships changed once he met Alejandra. In addition, his view on blood as a metaphorical description, to the true life force of all beings is another lesson he learned during his transformation into a young adult. In All The Pretty Horses, McCarthy uses both motifs to spread his theme throughout the novel and portray John Grady’s metamorphosis dramatically from the beginning to the end.
In both stories it is explicitly told that the mothers in fact do not love their children and it is just a façade. Hester felt as if her children “…had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them” but according to individuals she knew “…[s]he adores her children (334-335).” Hester was not fit to be a mother because her children knew she did not love them and cared for him as a mother should and she showed herself to be phony by accepting everyone’s false beliefs on her parenting. Mrs. Dickinson is “…really ashamed of…” Frederick and since love is about acceptance and she has not accepted her child her love for him is questionable (111). Her being a mother is not admirable because her child id unable to be himself around her and she does not love him and accept him for who he
When comparing the themes of each story, surprising similarities arise. First, both are developed around the lives of children. In “The Destructors” a group of boys called the Wormsley Gang have the same view of the world around them. They have grown up together and share stories about the bombs that destroyed their town. They also challenge each other to accomplish various tasks. The house that the boys ultimately destroy represents the greediness of Mr. Thomas, an architect who owns the tattered home. The Wormsley Gang called him ‘Old Misery’. In the Rocking Horse Winner”, the story’s plot is thickend by a a young boys obsessive desire to “become lucky”. This young boy, Paul, believes that his house is continually whispering, “…there must be more money…there must be more money”. Paul is able to relate the self-proclaimed dissatificatoin of his mothers life with the odd mood of his house. Paul knows that although his mother appears to have everything together on the outside, she does not love him on the inside. Paul believes that he can please his mother if he is able to find a way to give her more money. In both stories, the houses were very symbolic.
Luck and love have always been two very important and contradicting themes in many stories. Children and adults would go above and beyond to receive their parent’s affection and approval even to the point of death and isolation. At times this creates a dysfunctional aspect in the family’s lives. “A Rose for Emily” and “The Rocking Horse Winner” have very similar symbol meanings and themes explaining the dysfunctional family, love and luck.
Hester is indeed a sinner, adultery is no light matter, even today. On the other hand, her sin has brought her not evil, but good. Her charity to the poor, her comfort to the broken-hearted, her unquestionable presence in times of trouble are all direct results of her quest for repe...
Jack had heard about this wild horse race and he knew about the cash prize. Back at home it was only his wife, 3 year old daughter, and himself. He spent everyday working in the fields
Unfortunately, the horse gets out, and Henry puts all of the blame on her, as he then beats her with the rope. Surprisingly, the conning Texas man is disturbed by this, so he offers Henry his money back for the horse, but he refuses. It becomes a matter of principle and power for Henry. The story goes on, and a horse ends up in the house of Mrs. Littlejohn. It finally emerges, but ends up flipping over the wagon of Vernon Tull. In the midst of all the madness, Henry’s leg gets broken. Will Varner comes to the rescue and helps to somewhat mend his leg. What is odd about all of this happening is that Flem Snopes is nowhere to be found when he is essentially the cause of it all. Inevitably, Flem returns. Earlier in the story, Henry refused to take his five dollars back, but after everything went down, she thought, surely, that she could get it back. All the while she was debating asking him, she was complaining to Mrs. Littlejohn, and in return, she became quite annoyed. Her comic, yet sinister, response is “…Henry can buy another five-dollar horse with it. Maybe he’ll buy one next time that will out and out kill him. If I thought that, I’d give you back the money, myself” (Faulkner). When Flem re-emerges, it seems like everyone is taunting him, mostly the Snopeses themselves, about what had happened because they basically tell him he got what was coming to
First, the horse’s master puts a bit on him, which the horse does not enjoy, but does not mind because of the master’s kind words and gentle ways. Then the master puts the saddle on the horse. Again the master is gentle and calm with the horse, and feeds him oats as he completes the task. Then he rides the horse, but only for a little while each time. The horse quickly becomes accustomed to his rider and is proud to carry his master. Next, the master takes the horse to get horseshoes put on. The master stays with the
The short story, "Rocking-Horse Winner", and the movie based on it contrast considerably. When the written story has ended the movie continues with ideas, which may not come from the author. Three major differences of the two are: the mother, the father, and the ending. In the movie the mother, Hester, is portrayed as a loving and self-sacrificing person. While in the short story she is exposed to be a cold-hearted, and greedy person. Another instance where the short story and movie differ is the role of the father.
Throughout the novel, the harsh Puritan townspeople begin to realize the abilities of Hester despite her past. Hester works selflessly and devotes herself to the wellbeing of others. “Hester sought not to acquire anything beyond a subsistence of the plainest and most ascetic description, for herself, and a simple abundance for her child.
Contrary to the story’s focus on horses, the movie focuses on the romance between John Grady and Alejandra as its poster has the couple with a greater presence compared to the miniscule graphic of horses shoved on the bottom; whereas the book’s cover is graced with the image of a horse and only of that horse. Of all the events that were absent from the movie, the romance scenes are the most kept intact as well as an odd addition of an onlooker dancing when John Grady finishes talking with Alejandra on the phone after being bailed out of jail. In fact, it feels like horses are more of an afterthought in this adaptation because John Grady does not put any emphasis on them as he does in the novel. While in jail, John Grady had a dream about horses, “… in the dream he was among the horses running and in the dream he himself could run with the horses …” (McCarthy 161) In the fashion of flickering images for a subliminal message, brief, flashing visions of Alejandra are injected into this dream when there were none. Romance is pushed as the main focus of the story, but it fails to make the couple fulfilling since the dynamic between John Grady and Alejandra is not developed well enough to make it
Have you ever believed in a supernatural power or something that gives the ability to have an edge over others? In D.H Lawrence’s The Rocking Horse Winner, there is a young boy named Paul that has the ability to be able to see the future somewhat and win bets for a rather sad reason. All the boy wants is for his mother to believe that he is lucky and for her show him love and affection. Sadly, Paul works very hard to attempt to prove to his mother that he is indeed lucky, and to prove to her that their family is not cursed with bad luck. Then sadly, the mother does not give Paul the appreciation he wants until it is far too late and her son dies of exhaustion, all just for his mother to see that he is lucky so she would show him affection. Three messages portrayed in this story are, family, wealth, and luck.