Canadian companies are beginning to outsource more and more jobs outside of our borders to foreign countries. Outsourcing out of the country comes with a lot of benefits and risks for both the companies and the economy. There are a multitude of different jobs and services that can be outsourced; a few of the main ones include IT services, technical and customer support services, manufacturing, and legal services. Even though outsourcing saves companies a lot of money and makes it easier to keep your business running, it still poses a very large treat to our economy since it leaves Canadian citizens out of the job and instead gives them away to foreigners. Even with this problem however, I still strongly believe that outsourcing to other countries outside of Canada is a wise business decision and should be allowed to continue. I will demonstrate this belief by contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing outside of Canada. Outsourcing may be a wise business decision for certain companies but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it doesn’t carry any risks with it. Outsourcing jobs to countries outside of Canada brings risks to the businesses and companies using it and problems for other people in the Canadian labour force actively looking for jobs. A possible risk for companies that are outsourcing is a lack of focus on their company. If your company has outsourced the services of a vendor than there is a large chance that other companies have also hired the same vendor to work for them. This means that the vendor is simultaneously working for your company and other companies which can take their focus off of you and possibly make them lag in work or do a worse job. Another disadvantage is a growing dependence on... ... middle of paper ... ... to grow, the businesses are then later able to offer more and more jobs since they are continuing to expand. This helps workers to find jobs that would otherwise have had never existed. To conclude, after contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing outside of our border we can see that it poses threats and benefits to companies, workers, and the economy alike, however, I still believe that outsourcing outside of Canada is beneficial and should continue. The main reason for this being that since outsourcing hinders the economy at first but then aids it in the long run, it in the end stays the same. So if we take the economy out of the equation we’re left with many more advantages than disadvantages and there are many more companies and businesses that are being created, prospering, and growing allowing for more job openings for Canadian workers.
The very existence of offshoring is in and of itself evidence that, at least in most cases, it is advantageous for firms to engage in offshoring. However, as is the case with most business activities, its externalities can affect various stakeholder groups in both positive and negative ways. In society’s view, stakeholders to consider are Canadian workers, Canadian consumers, competitors, shareholders and executives, citizens of other countries, and future generations.
Recently outsourcing has been in the news, especially during political election years. It seems to be a phenomenon that is causing much concern among the population. But exactly how is outsourcing effecting both workers and businesses? And is it as big of a problem as politicians describe?
Both sides can agree that outsourcing can be desirable for a business do to the potential profit. It allows goods to be made cheaper, management to run smoother, and money to be made faster (Salanţă 270). Both sides can also agree, however, that U.S. jobs are lost as a result of outsourcing (Ahmed 192), as well as environmental damage being cause due to corporations taking advantage of loose environmental regulations (Marquis 39). Upon digging deeper into this debate, one can find that both sides present very convincing arguments.
This report is extremely credible and qualified, as it was written by an author who is well-versed on the topic. The author was also the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, making him even more authentic source. Throughout the article, the author discusses and examines the words of two other authors, Ron and Anil Hira, who are experts on the subject of American Outsourcing. These authors are also very credible; one is a professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, and the other is a professor at Simon Fraser University. Additionally, the author refers to many case studies that were taken at different universities in order to justify his claims on why American Outsourcing is bad. The intended audience is
Outsourcing provides products we may lack the resources to produce in America. We could buy technology that hasn 't been developed yet, or services our nation does not offer. But in excess outsourcing will cause more problems than benefits. In Michael Dennis Scott 's book Scott on Outsourcing: Law and Practice Dennis evaluates the trouble it takes to have a successful outsourcing contract. He points out that “the parties must continually work to ensure that the relationship continues in a mutually satisfactory manner” to be successful in the long term. For outsourcing to work both parties must be very flexible as unexpected circumstances are likely to emerge. When outsourcer relationships go wrong a huge number of problems could occur. One major risk is that there is a risk of losing confidential data to partner, this could hurt the business greatly and cause safety concerns for the company. Also the products may take much longer than anticipated to be produced and arrive since many outsourcers may have several partners. There also may be hidden legal problems and costs if the partnership contract isn 't reviewed in depth and conditions are left undefined. There is also the major risk of the other business going bankrupt, if this happens the financial loss to American companies could be out of
...ect on the college graduates and younger children of today. Outsourcing has made nothing but trouble for the United States with the passing of free trade agreements. It will cause a lack of jobs that will run the economy into the ground, and ruin the lives of the citizens of the United States. All of that so a business can use its faulty practices to make a higher profit. Outsourcing has consequences that will haunt the average American and their families for the rest of their existence on this planet.
When you think of outsourcing it is probably more accurate to think of it not as people's jobs that are going somewhere else but as a job, as in something that needs to be done, going to another business. For example if you have a company of forty people and you decide to get a new computer system for everyone. You may pay another company to do your IT and customer support for those computers. There for you didn't take away a job from someone you just didn't create one for the need. You paid another company to do it. They then can use one of there people who is familiar with the system already, or they take on the cost of training someone.
Outsourcing has only very recently become an issue in the United States, and as a result it has become a very popular political issue during campaigns for presidency. Outsourcing is the idea that a company will subcontract to a third party, usually outside of the US, for various parts of its business structure. An example of this and perhaps the largest source of outsourcing is call centers for tech support, where a company will subcontract to a third party and that party will build up the call center and hire the workers for it. Many people have been affected by outsourcing since it started being used widely in the 1980s, and most would argue that outsourcing is not a good business model, that while it not only negatively affects them, it affects the whole economy. While there are some unmistakable positives to outsourcing, I would argue that as a whole, the negatives far outweigh the positives and outsourcing is bad for the United States.
Kibbe, C. (2004). Outsourcing: the good, the bad and the inevitable. New Hampshire business review, 26(14), 1A.
As esteemed journalist Tom Piatak wisely puts it, “The trickle of outsourcing threatens to become a flood.” His words speak the truth as outsourcing has left United States’ workers jobless, and it continues to increase the unemployment rate every year. During February of 2009, American workers lost a record 651,000 jobs alone, increasing the unemployment rate to 8.1 percent, the highest it has been in 25 years (Katel). Multinational corporations, hoping to cut down costs and stay profitable in the market, outsource by exporting American jobs to third-world countries such as China and India. It may seem noble that outsourcing provides third-world countries with job opportunities, but the United States’ markets and industries are greatly affected. Outsourcing is harmful to the United States’ economy because it paves the way for job losses, decreases product consumption, and widens the gap between the rich and the poor.
The larger issues with outsourcing are jobs for American’s being shipped overseas and American citizens being left with out jobs. If these Americans had the jobs that are being shipped overseas then more money would be in circulation and our economy would not only be able to recover from this rescission but grow. Money has to be in circulation for our economy to grow but if people do not have the money to spend then money will not circulate. Yes outsourcing jobs does allow lowering the price of products but you have to take into account what it cost to ship the products to America, which is fossil fuel being burned. If jobs were brought back to America that would allow more people to spend money on various things building...
Outsourcing has become a very popular issue, and it has reached an all-time climax. Firms are starting to do this a lot more than than in the previous decade. What is outsourcing? Outsourcing is defined as “The procuring of services or products, such as the parts used in manufacturing a motor vehicle, from an outside supplier or manufacturer in order to cut costs.” And it has become a big issue in our country. There are thousands of articles and books written on it, and you can attend numerous classes and speeches on the subject. The use of outsourcing is quite simple really… Either pay an American worker $15 an hour, or pay someone in India to do the same job for $2 an hour. There are lots of other advantages and disadvantages to outsourcing but I will address those later in the essay. So what does an average American really know about outsourcing? Most people would say sending our jobs to another country in order to save money isn’t justified. It would cost a lot of people jobs, which would send them into distress and possibly debt. But that’s not the whole story behind outsourcing. People hear about outsourcing and automatically decide that it is bad for our economy. What about the good things that outsourcing brings to our economy? We are sending jobs to India, their consumers will start making more money, and in return buy more of our goods and services. In this essay I will show you both points of the debate and you can decide for yourself whether or not outsourcing is bad for our country.
Economic growth focuses on encouraging firms to invest or encouraging people to save, which in turn creates funds for firms to invest. It runs hand-in-hand with the goal of high employment because in order for firms to be comfortable investing in assets such as plants and equipment, unemployment must be low. Hereby, the people and resources will be available to spur economic growth.
People need to get educated about the great impact that offshore outsourcing has on an economy. The global economy has started to thrive and offshore outsourcing has profited the consumers as companies want to cut costs and competition, which is why I support offshore outsourcing jobs to foreign countries. What does it mean to offshore outsource? Let’s first start by explaining what outsourcing means. The basic meaning of outsourcing is to obtain goods or services from an outside source.
Entrepreneurs create new businesses, and new businesses in turn create jobs, strengthening competition, and may even increase productivity through technological change. Increases in levels of entrepreneurship will result to an increase in economic growth (Nolan, 2003).Entrepreneurs by starting or setting up their businesses, will help with local development by locating less developed areas. The growth of industries and businesses in these areas leads to infrastructure improvements, such as better roads and stable electricity. Every business that is located in a less developed area will create opportunities that will improve the living conditions of people residing in that particular area (Nolan, 2003).