The Pros And Cons Of Medicare

730 Words2 Pages

would become insured. That would help more people than ever to become insured, and take a huge load of their shoulders.
I mentioned Medicare and Medicaid a few paragraphs above. With both of these aid’s being government funded programs, there’s differences between them. Medicare has certain contributors that help others in need pay for their bills. This fund is certainly for elderly people, and people with disabilities. The individuals that are covered by this plan only pay part of the expense out of pocket. While Medicaid is provided through federal and state funds. This type of coverage also helps elders, but helps kids under 19, parents, and parent’s dependent upon their children. Health care should be a human right. It shouldn’t be a privilege that individuals have to pay for, it should be provided to everyone. In 2017 Bernie Sanders said, “Every man, woman and child in our country should be able to access the health care they need regardless of …show more content…

A man called Ben Shapiro is a very right sided conservative. His main claim is that health care isn’t a right, it’s a commodity. He’s referring health care to a commodity because of how valuable a thing health care is. He doesn’t mind funding some type of health care, “Medical care is a commodity, and treating it otherwise is foolhardy” (Johnson). What Ben Shapiro is trying to say is that, there will be no profit in the system. White Matt Canovi talks about how health care is not a right in anyway. He wants the free market to be able to flourish, “Healthcare in a free society is not a function of Government. The Government needs to get out of the healthcare business and allow the free market to flourish” (Johnson). Canovi agrees with Shapiro that health care is a commodity not a right. He doesn’t want the government to start declaring commodities as rights because the power is

Open Document