The Pros And Cons Of Mechanization

1729 Words4 Pages

The Industrial Revolution during the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries was a period in time when Europe, especially England, began to go through mechanization—the transition from using hand tools, to energy powered machinery. Through the advancement of technology, development of power, and an increase in mechanization, the production of society also increased. The invention of the cotton gin sped up the process of separating seeds from cotton, and as a result, made slavery much more profitable. Eventually, slave labor and cotton formed the economic basis of the United States economy. The accumulation of such wealth facilitated the spread of capitalism. Although philosophers in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries agreed on the fact …show more content…

He hoped that through enlightening the working class with his own philosophies and ideas and thus provoking a revolution, he would be able to destroy the system. He states that the only solution to real reform is revolution and that “the Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations”7. And thus, claiming that other solutions acquired through legislation would be nearly impossible because the state is already controlled by capitalistic elites. He ultimately hoped for a society where “workers would toil not merely for self-interests and individual profit, but for the welfare of all, guided by the maxim ‘from each according to his ability; to each according to his need”2. Unlike Smith, Marx argued that humans were social animals—that humans are who they are because of the influence of society. Self-governing individuals, as liberals understood it, were merely just a way to justify the capitalistic system. Marxists believed that class struggle was the only way to lead to change in society and that the best way to understand how a society is structured, is by analyzing their modes of production-- how a society produces its means of sustainability. His view on society was focused on two specific kinds of relationships: the relationship between humans and nature, and all other social relations. The relationship between two different kinds of social …show more content…

Thorstein Veblen, a professor and scholar of economics influenced by Darwin, examined capitalism from a perspective heavily tainted by the theory of evolution. His main argument was that humans were not only driven by their self-interest and accumulation of power, but also their display and reputation of their wealth. He argues that when “man consumes freely and of the best, in food, drink, narcotics, shelter, services… [it] is an evidence of wealth,” conversely, if they fail “to consume in due quantity and quality” of their counterparts and brethren, then it “becomes a mark of inferiority and demerit”8. During America’s Gilded Age, a new emphasis has been put on self-image and reputation, giving rise to an awareness of conspicuous consumption. A term coined by Veblen, conspicuous consumption is where “one’s wealth, status, and ‘reputation’ were increasingly defined by the quantity and quality of one’s material posessions”4. Contrary to Adam Smith, Veblen argued that “irrational human desire and control for greater status and prestige” is what determines economic behavior5. Smith, on the other hand, disagreed and believed that a rational pursuit of self-interest is what caused the primary driving force of economic behavior. Because Veblen observed the economy with an evolutionary outlook, he noticed that the men who ran the business world possessed a more “survivalist” ambition than the

Open Document