The Pros And Cons Of Eviction

1308 Words3 Pages

The urban removal of citizens without warning and without compensation is a major problem in Rio and numerous of Brazil’s other cities. Living in close proximity highly valued land and the fact that these communities often lack the organization to defend themselves legally, the evictions target the poorest members of Brazil’s society. Numerous media outlets have covered these stories over the last couple years, with similar scenarios happening throughout. Pacification process In parts of Brazil’s favelas where evictions were deemed unnecessary, a different set of actions have been implemented to secure the safety of fans, journalists, and teams who will be visiting the city. According to Baena in the Harvard International Review, Rio de Janeiro’s governor visited Colombia in 2007 in order to observe improvements in their public security. Following this trip he managed to allocate nearly $1.7 billion U.S. dollars of government aid to improve the security and livelihood of Rio, mainly in the favelas (Baena, 2011, p. 36). In 2008, the state introduced a new police force known as Pacifying Police Units or UPPs. The UPPs aim to ‘pacify’ favelas through a three step process. First, they stage violent interventions to force out the existing gangs and drug lords who have seized control of power in the regions. Typically, these interventions are “short and brutal raids- arriving at night in armed columns to ransack, torture, and kill” (Parenti, 2010, p. 18). Secondly, once a favela is deemed secure and power is removed from the hands of gangs, so called peacekeeping police units establish permanent bases and begin routine patrols. These patrols are seen as an effort to keep the organized crime from retaining power. The last ... ... middle of paper ... ...duals caused strain on their employment opportunities as well as destroying their existing daily routines and livelihood. The construction taking place in Brazil for the World Cup and Olympics can be closely related to urban development projects (UDPs). According to Swyngedouw (2002), “physical reconstruction and economic recovery tend to go hand in hand” (p. 577). However, UDPs do not affect all residents the same. Similar to the marginalization that takes place during preparation for mega sporting events, UDPs also have a history of increasing “physical and social fragmentation” (Swyngedouw, 2002, p. 577). UDPs are also notorious for the special regulations they receive which enables the timely completion of such projects. Brazil’s preparations for these two mega events have been given special priority and little can stand in the way of the construction.

Open Document