Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the difference between negotiation mediation arbitration
The case about arbitration
The case about arbitration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Arbitration is appropriate when two parties know they will be unable to resolve a dispute by negotiation or mediation. Identify the steps that must be taken if one person would rather go to court.
The first step will be determining if litigation is a possibility based on the organization’s contract agreement with the parties involved. If the contract has a clause that arbitration must be used to resolve conflicts, then litigation is not an option. If the parties are not under this type of clause, then the individual (now known as the plaintiff) that wants to take the issue to court will hire a lawyer and a complaint and summons are usually filed. The summons is a description of the complaint that is given to the defendant. This also advises the defendant of the date that they must answer the lawsuit. The defendant will generally hire their own lawyer then and each party will gather the information needed for court. Motions are filed by both parties through the court, this may be to request evidence or a
…show more content…
F. & McConnell, C. R., (n.d.). Human Resource Management in Health Care. Retrieved from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net
Stone, K.V. & Colvin, A. J., (2015, December 7). The arbitration epidemic. Retrieved from Economic Policy Institution: http://www.epi.org/publication/the-arbitration-epidemic/
Describe the differences between arbitration and mediation.
According to Britannica academic “arbitration is nonjudicial legal technique for resolving disputes by referring them to a neutral party for a binding decision, or “award” (Britannica Academic, 2017). Arbitration will reach a decision in which one of the parties “wins” so to say. Arbitration is more formal than mediation is and often involves more than one arbitrator. An arbitrator can enforce a solution in binding arbitration. Arbitrators are normally derived from the National Academy of Arbitrators in which these are based on experience and education (Fallon & McConnell,
Bohlander, George, and Scott Snell. Managing Human Resources. 15th. Mason, OH: South-Western Pub, 2009. 98-147. Print.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Fundamentals of human resource management (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2010). Human resource management (13th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomas/South-western
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
Noe, Raymond A., et al. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010. Print.
Massey, R. (1994). Taking a strategic approach to human resource management. Health manpower management, 20, 27-30.
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart, and Patrick M. Wright. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010. Print.
The ADR process that is used in a particular situation depends on the circumstances of that case. According to the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, New York County, the principal forms of ADR are the following: 1) Mediation- A process in which a Neutral attempts to facilitate a settlement of a dispute by conferring informally with the parties, jointly and in separate “caucuses,” and focusing upon practical concerns and needs as well as the merit of each side’s position; 2) Neutral Evaluation- A process in which an expert Neutral receives a presentation about the merits from each side and attempts to evaluate the presentations and predict how a court would decide the matter; 3) Arbitration- A process in which the parties present evidence to a neutral or panel of Neutrals, who then issues a decision determining the merits of the case. An arbitration may be binding or advisory, depending upon the agreement of the parties. If binding, the decision of the arbitrator (s) ends the case, subject only to circumscribed review pursuant to Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions for disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is a more of a official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11):
An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy. Bibliography Byars, L. L. (1997). The.
Human Resource Management is defined as the process of managing human talent to achieve an organization’s objectives (Bohlander & Snell, 2010). A more detailed definition is given by the Society for Human Resource Management which states that “human resource management is the function within an organization that focuses on recruiting, managing, and providing direction for the people who work in the organization” (Schmidt, 2011). The role that human resource management plays is the most vital in all business organizations. This importance is easily seen in running a health care facility. Human resource in health care is important in improving the overall patient health outcomes and the delivery of health care services.
Both forms of ADR have several common characteristics. However, one must consider that a neutral side in both procedures fulfils distinct from one another duties. Mediators do not have the objective to make decision, whereas arbitrators determine an outcome of the case. Upon the termination of the procedure, an arbiter renders a binding award that cannot be later avoided by disputants. During mediation, parties are not contingent upon the third side and enjoy freedom of actions needed for dispute resolution. In contrast, in case of failure to reach an agreement, parties are not legally bound for actions afterwards. By considering the true qualities of arbitration and mediation taken individually, legislation and scientists suggest that in single arbitration, arbitrators may use mediators’ functions to promote amicable settlement and functions of both arbitrators and mediators have incongruous
Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.
Fisher, C., Schoefeldt, L., & Shaw, J. (1996). Human resource management. (3rd Edition). Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Torrington, D., Hall, L. and Taylor, S. (2008). Human Resource Management, 7th ed. Prentice Hall.