The Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

562 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Higher history appeasement quizlet

Appeasement is the process or act of “pacifying or placating by acceding to their demands. In 1935, a naval agreement was signed by Britain and Germany. It was an agreement primarily associated by Neville Chamberlain - who became the prime minister of Great Britain in May 1937. Appeasement in that case was Britain giving Germany what Hitler wanted in hope that he would - at some point become satisfied and draw back on his aggressive actions. This policy lasted for three years - until France and Britain realized that it was hopeless, and that Hitler would always want more. The decision of Appeasement was strongly advocated by Chamberlain, as it was shown in a letter written to his sister on June 1938. Chamberlain was confident that appeasement would stop Hitler because of several reasons. At the time, he had many British people supporting him, as well as politicians - which gave him confidence relating to this issue. Chamberlain also had bigger threats, such as the spread of communism - which resulted in them not considering Hitler as their biggest problem. However, the appeasement di...

Show More
Related

  • Account for the responses of the European democracies to the military aggression by Italy and Germany during the 1930s.

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the 1930s, European governments found it necessary to appease Hitler and Mussolini. Appeasement is the word that clearly sums up the policies and actions that were taken by the European governments. There were a few reasons that these concessions were offered by European countries: none of the countries wanted another World War, the devastating effects that the Great Depression had on each country, and the European governmental chaos and political turmoil was widespread.

    Read More

  • Appeasement Dbq

    480 Words  | 1 Pages

    It failed to produce the desired results, but rather added fuel to the fire. At the Munich Conference the Big Four discussed the demands for the territory of Czechoslovakia and ultimately gave into Hitler’s request. While many people like Neville Chamberlain argued that appeasement was the best option Winston Churchill viewed it as a consequential decision. Churchill stated that he, “thinks of all the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi Power which have been thrown away.” No action was taken to establish the security of Czechoslovakia making the Nazi’s more powerful. Appeasement did not defer the hostility that the desire for expansion brought on, but made it escalate. When Ethiopia was invaded by the Italians the emperor, Haile Selassie, was denied assistance from the Leage of Nations. He warned them what would happened if the aggressors were not stopped and wrote, “It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.” Haile Selassie knew that aggressors were going to continue to seek for more land and that any nation could be attacked next. Not only was appeasement an effort to satisfy the demands of dissatisfied powers in hope of maintaining stability, but it was also the disregardance of possibly serious conflict. The League of Nations incapability to be a forceful united front allowed for the Axis Powers to become even more willing to break boundaries. Appeasement was used to be the path of least resistance, but it would never stop the

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ww2

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the beginning of World War II, America decided to remain neutral due to the economic loss that had accumulated during the Great Depression. When WW2 started, America wanted to help out the Allies that were involved in the war. So America introduced the Neutrality acts which were beneficial to America and the Allies. The most significant Neutrality acts were the Cash and Carry and Lend and Lease Acts. The Cash and Carry Act was issued during the year of 1939 to allow Americans to sell non-military arms and supplies to the Allies only if they paid cash and supplied own transport. This act was later modified and introduced as the Lend and Lease act in 1942, through which America would be able to transport war supplies including food, machinery,

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Cold War

    1408 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States had bought Alaska from Russia partly so that the tsar would not be offended by a refusal. This kind of relation between the two became a rarity later on, especially in the twentieth century. The tense ambiance of this period gave no room for a civil affiliation between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic. After World War II, the two nations battled it out in a conceptual war known as the Cold War. It was characterized by a competition between the nations’ political philosophies- the USSR wanted communism to dominate the world, while the US wanted democracy to prevail. However, the war did not come about suddenly- it was congealed over a period of time by multiple factors. As World War II ended, the

    Read More

  • Why Did Ww2 Break Out

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia due to the fact that they had been asking for appease with Hitler as Czechoslovakia wanted Sudetenland back. This meant that Hitler broke the Munich Agreement and was lying at the Munich conference. In addition, this showed that Hitler couldn't be trusted and Chamberlain assumed that WW2 could start because Hitler already invaded Czechoslovakia and could move to any other country. Britain knew that Germany were going to invade Poland so Chamberlain threatened to defend Poland in case Hitler went through with the invasion.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Adolf Hitler

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many historians agree that "Tyrants have left noble monuments, while Adolf Hitler left only death." After the humiliating defeat from World War One and the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles, Germans were ready for change in government and leadership. Germany blamed the Weimar Republic for the country 's defeat in World War One, which Adolf Hitler used to his advantage. When Hitler came to power he forced Jews out of their homes and into concentration camps, ordered massacres, and tortured millions of people he disliked, because he had the authority to do so. Justice vanished during his rule as anyone who opposed Nazism, Hitler 's storm troopers removed via concentration camps or death. While it may seem that Adolf Hitler came to power

    Read More

  • Collective Security Dbq

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    Yet during the time appeasement seemed to be logical, as stated in document 8 only the German people could take away Hitler’s power which is why the League tried to appease to Hitler. Also the League feared that if they defeated Germany, Russia would take over most of Europe in their absence. While those are good reasons to try to appease to Hitler, the League of Nations forgot one important detail, Germany wasn’t afraid of the League. Neville Chamberlain the prime minister of Britain was an avid supporter of appeasement, yet even he said he would fight Germany if they were trying to dominate the world by fear of its force according to document 5. What Chamberlain failed to notice was that is what Germany was trying to do.

    Read More

  • Hitler and the Road to War

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between the Years of 1933 -1937 Hitler began to take gambles, gambles which paid off, bring a unsuspecting, naive Europe closer and closer to war. In 1933 Hitler ordered the Germany delegates to leave the Geneva disarmament conference with an excuse that Germany was already

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Origins of Second World War by A.J.P. Taylor

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”

    Read More

  • The Positive Consequences Of World War II

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    World War II was based on the idealistic view of Americans, especially concerning the people’s perspectives on how America was being perceived, and how they wanted to be seen. The American public, witnessing foreign tragedy worked to push against suppression in order to rise in equality. Coming out of the Great Depression America was extremely cautious about intervention in foreign affairs spurring an isolationist view. When determining their entrance into World War II America thought about the immense amount of casualties brought from World War I and the lack of positive consequences. Much of the changes enveloping society were a continuation of the new deal policies.

    Read More

  • Appeasement

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 1920s had a good outlook towards peace, but near the end of the decade and throughout the 1930s signs of war were forming. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy, and Japan took aggressive actions, and neither the League of Nations nor the democratic countries were stopping them. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain suggested the policy of appeasement towards Hitler to keep peace. Europe moved closer to war as these actions were made. World War II was propelled by the lack of judgement by the League of Nations by continuous appeasing Hitler.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Treaty Of Versailles

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Treaty of Versailles was a treaty created at the end of World War I, in hopes of establishing peace among nations. Although it sought after harmony, the United States’ Senate refused to ratify the treaty due to the distasteful idea of the United States’ involvement in the League of Nations, and Woodrow Wilson’s unwillingness to compromise with Henry Cabot Lodge’s revisions of The Treaty of Versailles.

    Read More

  • Explain Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to stop the fighting between countries, Europe needed to put some actions into effect because appeasement was not working. Germany proved that by disregarding the Versailles Treaty. According to Hitler after disregarding the Versailles Treaty, “I look upon this day as marking the close of the struggle for German equality status…the path is now clear for Germany’s return to European collective cooperation” (Document 3, 1936) This quote explains a vast difference between Hitler’s and the other European countries' views. With Hitler’s affirmation to make Germany equal and even more powerful than the other European countries, the other European countries would have to set up collective security because they would have very little insight on what Hitler would be planning; leading to more destruction. Now, Europe would be more prepared if Hitler decided to attack. A quote from Winston Churchill explaining why collective security is the right answer is, “…I think all of the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi power which have been thrown away. The responsibility must rest with those who have control of our political affairs. They neither prevented Germany from rearming, nor did they rearm us in time…Thus they left us in the hour of trial without a strong national defense or system of international security” (Churchill). That quote explains how collective security is the best answer to stop war and the destruction Hitler is

    Read More

  • Appeasement Essay

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the policy of appeasement was described by some scholars as ineffective. The fact that the policy of appeasement failed to avert World War 2 is a direct justification that it was a wrong-headed policy. The policy allowed Germany to reconstruct its military slowly and eventually was prepared to go into war to defend its military triumph. Chamberlain was aware of Hitler’s ambitions, but thought that the best alternative to deal with his ambitions was negotiations. This was a misguided move which the world is able to learn from.

    Read More

  • Appeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement

    5818 Words  | 12 Pages

    Meanwhile, Fuhrer Hitler and the Nazi party were continuing their domination of Europe and threatening to invade Czechoslovakia, which many felt would most likely incite another World War. To prevent this, England, France, Italy and Germany entered into an agreement, which would allow Germany to seize control of Sudetenland and is today known as the ‘Munich Pact’. Sudetenland had a large German population and its borders were in strategically strong areas for the German military. For negotiations to be successful there are many components that one must be aware of such as personalities of all parties, end goals of each person and the history of the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Appeasement

Open Document