Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does social influence individual development
How does social influence individual development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does social influence individual development
Finding The True Self Throughout life people are always seeking something, whether it is finding out ideals, desires, lovers, and perhaps themselves. However, recognizing, fulfilling, and rising above one’s true self are the hardest things in the world because one always seems certain of him or herself and is strongly influenced by his or her surroundings. Hence, taking the time to practice experiences is a way for an individual to precisely know him or herself and actively participate in society. In the essay, “The Power of Context,” Malcolm Gladwell states that the features of one’s current social and physical environment will strongly influence his or her behaviors. Those actions that an individual conduct in response to the situation …show more content…
Otherwise, the self-construction that one built in certain situations for him or herself will be a misjudgment of one’s true self, which will even bring negative effects in society. O’Brien and Gladwell illustrate this idea, and they both suggest that in a chaotic environment, individuals tend to be more ruthless because they have to vent their feelings, which does not reflect their true selves. O’Brien gives an example of Rat, who lost his comrade in the war. Rat’s reaction to that situation was to torture a baby buffalo as he “ shot it twice in the flanks. It wasn’t to kill; it was to hurt” (321). In the situation of losing the best comrade, Rat constructed himself as a killer who tortured a baby buffalo because he was afflicted with sad, despondent, and resentful feelings. The way he killed the buffalo was cruel just as the war killed his comrade. And thus Rat was the pseudo-self in this situation because his ruthless act led to the death of a living creature. To further explain this idea, Gladwell suggests that in a chaotic situation, one becomes ruthless to have a sense of control over that situation, and this kind of feeling
I found Gladwell’s first chapter of Outliers entitled “The Matthew Effect” to be both interesting, confusing, and perhaps somewhat lopsided. Based on Matthew 25:2, Gladwell simply explains, “It is those who are successful, in other words, who are most likely to be given to the kinds of special opportunities that lead to further success.” (Gladwell 2008, pg. 30) The Matthew Effect seems to extend special advantages and opportunities to some simply based on their date of birth.
Malcolm Gladwell, in order to make his argument seem credible, utilizes specific writing techniques. Gladwell frequently uses anecdotes about successful individuals as examples to further strengthen his argument. Gladwell write that, “One warm, spring day in May of 2007, the Medicine Hat Tigers and the Vancouver Giants met for the Memorial Cup hockey championships in Vancouver, British Columbia” (Gladwell 15). Frequently, Gladwell starts each chapter with a story about an individual group. These stories showcase the events and lives of successful people and are followed by Gladwell’s analysis of their success. By using specific, descriptive anecdotes, Gladwell is proving the credibility of his argument. Instead of just reciting his analysis,
Situations and environment can cause paranoia which could manipulate the individual's mind. In The Lord of the Flies, another piece of evidence is when Jack was not able to deal with the pressure of being in the wild. When killing a pig after hunting he would chant “ ‘Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in’ ” (Golding 139)! In Golding’s novel, he insists that not everyone can remain calm when enclosed in a different environment. With Jack being stuck on a island with no civilization, he loses his mind and becomes a savage on a blinded rampage. In the article, “The Milgram Obedience Experiment”, Stanley Milgram quoted, “The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind of person a man is as the kind of situation in which he finds himself that determines how he will act” (Cherry). In “The
Another philosopher during the Enlightenment, Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that people have their own modes of feelings and thinking, and this is because they grow according to nature’s plan, which urges them to develop difference capacities and modalities at different stage (Chaffee, 80). Rousseau’s thought can be found in both Victor and the Creature. Victor was naturally a good human whose obsession was driven to achieve the impossible. The Creature wanted love and companion, but he was shunned by all that he encountered and therefore developed a sense of hatred and vengeance.
Cahill’s first main point of evidence is in a quote from Dell Upton where he argues ‘‘The navigation of everyday spaces, the ordinary, unexceptional sites of most of our sensory and intellectual experience, is the primary arena within which selfhood . . . and personhood . . . are forged.’’ In talking
The popular saying “practice makes perfect” has been used for many years encouraging younger generations to strive for success in whatever area they wish to excel in. Success is something everybody in society strides for but some do not know how it is achieved. However, there are many people throughout history who are known for achieving success in many areas. Malcolm Gladwell, a best selling author and speaker, identifies these people as being outliers. Gladwell identifies the word “outlier” in his story Outliers as “a scientific term to describe things or phenomena that lie outside normal experience.” Although Malcolm Gladwell does not establish credibility for himself in his novel, his targeted audience of a younger inexperienced generation feel the need to be informed by his detailed theories about becoming successful and eventually becoming an outlier. Although the reality of becoming successful can depend on instances one can not control, Gladwell tells his readers there is a great portion they can control through his theory, the 10,000 hour rule. He does this by using well presented logical persuasive appeals and interesting rhetorical devices such as: onomatopeias, exposition, and argumentation.
...raumatic for some, the acknowledgement that you can make a choice in your own environment, which controls who you transform to be, should provide encouragement, although illusionary that choice may be, its effects are not.
Malcolm Gladwell’s “Troublemakers” is an article in which he explores the way societies make generalizations. Malcolm explains how Ontario has banned pit bulls due to a boy being attacked and people viewing that one example to be enough to distinguish all pit bulls as vicious and bloodthirsty. He goes on to employ that all dogs even resembling pit bulls or that have some pit bull mixed into them have been banned as well, because anything that looks like a pit bull has now been deemed dangerous for the people in that society. Not only does Malcolm point out other ways societies generalize people, like racial profiling a terrorist, but he distinguishes how steps could have been taken to eliminate the threat of the pit bull but it seemed to just
Both Nicholas Carr and Malcolm Gladwell debated how the Internet has affected humankind in both positive and negative ways. Malcolm Gladwell is a staff writer for the New Yorker and the author of Small Change:Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted. Nicholas Carr is a writer who has formerly written for the New York Times, The Guardian etc, he also wrote Is Google Making Us Stupid? Gladwell’s and Carr’s essays identifies how the internet has a damaging effect on people.
In Night, he informs his reader of many examples on how a myriad of good people turn into brutes. They see horrific actions, therefore, they cannot help by becoming a brute. They experience their innocent family members being burned alive, innocent people dieing from starvation due to a minuscule proportion of food, and innocent people going to take a shower and not coming out because truly, it is a gas chamber and all f...
...almost like AN abused animal, the creature lashes out at those around him, killing and harming fellow teams of individuals as a results of he is constantly met with anger and violence himself. perhaps the creature would have shown compassion to others if he had been schooled compassion himself.
...survival with savagery. In man’s quest for survival, these primal desires gives rise to violence against the weak and oppressed. As a result, his rationality is questioned and a deep seeded, darker side of his nature begins to show.
The book is a collection of stories, references to the bible, references to ancient times, and examples all to help the reader understand what optimal experience is, and how to achieve this state of consciousness.
Fear brings out the worst in everybody, it is what keeps person’s mouth closed and makes them go along with the crowd. In Animal Farm, the animals feared their leader Napoleon, checking off one of the characteristics of a dystopian society. One late afternoon , Napoleon called the animals on the farm for a gathering. During the gathering four pigs confessed their crime of helping Snowball destroy the windmill, “when they had finished their confession the dogs promptly tore their throats out, and in a terrible voice Napoleon demanded whether any other animal had anything to confess” (Orwell 56). The animals were shocked and scared of Napoleon because of what he did to the other animals for confessing their crimes. Napoleon is showing what would happen if they rebelled against him, making the animals fear him. If the animals did not fear him, they would have rebelled against Napoleon but that did not happen indicating they were certainly afraid of Napoleon because of his power. This fear and intimidating power is once reminded of how they feared Mr. Jones before and then Napoleon. Not to mention, one afternoon the pigs had a meeting with the humans. The animals decided to sneak in and see what it was about but soon after there was a “violent quarrel” (Orwell 95). As the animals watched the pigs and humans shouting back and forth, “the creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again: but it was impossibly to say which was which” (Orwell 95). The animals are shocked when they came realize that Napoleon and the rest of the pigs are just like the humans implying that they should fear Napoleon and the other pigs because they are no better than Mr. Jones and the other humans. They realized that the fear they once had for Mr. Jones should be the same for Napoleon and now it was too late to do anything about it. Hinting, there was never a rebellion because they never achieved
The environment in which one lives may greatly affect one’s individuality. “The people and things around one affect how one may feel about oneself” (Kramer 12-13). His environment also affects the way a person behaves. The people and things that are around one could affect how one feels and thinks about oneself. A person’s environment can be controlled. If one is not happy in his environment, he can find a more suitable place to live. In several ways, one’s environment can determine who one will become in the future.