The Politics Of Staring: Visual Rhetorics Of Disability In Popular Photography: Actual Analysis

2103 Words5 Pages

Throughout history there has always been drawings or photography which depicts everyday life. There has been photography of the elderly, deceased, disabled and even adolescents, but as with any sort of media, it did not always help the subject. Rosemarie Garland- Thomson in her essay entitled The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography states that when specifically looking at photos of people with disabilities, “ None of these rhetorical modes [the wonderous, the sentimental, the exotic and the realistic] operates in the service of actual disabled people” (Garland-Thomson 59). In the same way photography cannot help the subject, in Garland-Thomson’s case those with disabilities photography can also be misconstrued in order to help the viewer and promote their own ideals. To quote Garland-Thomson, “[photographs] elicit responses or persuade viewers to think or act in certain ways.” (Garland-Thomson 58). This response can go two ways depending on the photo, it can either be helpful or destructive. The …show more content…

These visual rhetorics include unity, the emotional, the political and the disconnected. While all of these visual rhetorics can be found in photographs separately, when they come together, specifically in child labor law photos, the photograph is able to have more impact for the viewer. Then this impact, due to all the combinations of rhetoric, allow for the photographs to be used ultimately for the benefit of the adult. Photographs are used to make the adults feel better about the horrible situations that were going around them, in this case the child labor. From the photos adults hopes that they can make some sort of change, even though they are mostly to blame, and hopefully that will hopefully trickle down to the adolescent

Open Document