The Pledge Of Allegiance Pros And Cons

1935 Words4 Pages

"I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Sounds familiar right? A typical weekday morning for an elementary or middle school child most likely begins with him or her reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance. The pledge was created to convey America’s constitutional power and loyalty. Congress included the phrase "under God" to the pledge in the early 1950s. Afterward, the pledge has been put up for debate on whether or not the phrase belongs in the pledge. The pledge is no longer thought of as a form of glorification, but an invasion on citizen’s morals or lack there of. “Under God” should not be removed …show more content…

Lastly, the words “under God” do not encourage any religion in particular. It does not encourage Christianity in general. The phrase can acknowledge any religion because “under God” is not specifying a particular God. If the phrase favored Christianity then the phrase would say “under Jesus Christ”. As far as children are concerned, children are taught that the pledge means loyalty and honor. Children were not worried about the words "under God" because they were never taught to be concerned. Children also did not think that one phrase, meant that everyone in America needs to worship a particular God. Children are taught that words in the pledge stand for unity and justice. In the case of Newdow, even if “under God” was removed from the pledge, his daughter would find God written or spoken somewhere else. In America, God is everywhere. God is written on the money people spend, in the songs people sing, etc. To take God out of just one thing would be …show more content…

The pledge is no longer thought to be an honorary oath to the country, but and violation on citizen’s rights to speech and religion. “Under God” should not be removed from the pledge because there is nothing unconstitutional or biased about the phrase. If atheists are so concerned about the pledge offending them, why not create their own pledge. If they created their own pledge, they do not have to include God and they would be allowed to say whatever they would like without faulting the entire United States for reciting something that they believe is offensive and demeaning. If the phrase were to be taken out the pledge, then everything that has God written on it such as money, song lyrics, etc. would need to be removed as well. That is a lot of work for an entire nation. Taking the phrase out the pledge would not be a good idea. Works Cited "Appeals Court Upholds Use Of 'Under God' In Classroom Pledge." Church & State 1 Apr. 2010: 1. Web. 4 Nov. 2014. "Byrd Voted To Include 'Under God' In Pledge Of Allegiance In 1954." CongressDaily 27 June 2002: 14.Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov. 2014. Joan, Biskupic. "'Under God' stays in Pledge." USA Today n.d.: Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Nov.

Open Document