Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perils of indifference elie wiesel
Essay on ww2 genocides
Perils of indifference elie wiesel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perils of indifference elie wiesel
Jewish writer, Elie wiesel in his heroic speech, The Perils Of Indifference, states that indifference is a bad thing, a sin, because not anyone wants to be one person. No one would be able to choose how they want to be, they wouldn't have the freedom to do anything. He supports his claim that indifference is inhumane, and shows everyone that it is perfectly fine to be different and take your own path.To also convince all the people to be unique and be your own person.Ultimately to show that the only person that can define us is you only.Wiesel's purpose is to inform individuals that indifference is a low self of steam and a lack of confidence to us human beings.He creates an informative tone for the readers by using stylistic devices and rhetorical devices such as imagery,syntax and advanced word choice in order to lead us to his message. …show more content…
This is was one of the major genocide of the 20th century.Millions of people were killed by the devestatting war. This happened because they wanted to purge the land of non turks.Once when world war 1 broke out in 1915 laws were set to depopulate turkey of the armenian minority. Villages were burned down and many individuals were left in desert to die. Furthermore 2.5 million armenians lived in turkey before 1915, 1.5 million were killed.During that time around 450,000 greeks were killed and 300,000 assyrians were killed as well which end all three cultures in the region. Ultimately, this genocides related to wiesel's speech applying to how the armenians had no say on the laws that were set.They couldn't save their homes or their personal stuff. Overall, indifference and they very little freedom they had shows that they couldn't do what they wanted but someone else had to do it for
to the dehumanization of the Jews. He uses descriptive adjectives to shed light on what is truly happening. He also uses irony to help the reader understand the cluelessness of himself and the Jews. Wiesel’s way of writing in the book demonstrates the theme of dehumanization through false
Speeches are given for a purpose. Whether it is for persuasion, or education, or even entertainment, they all target certain parts of people’s minds. This speech, The Perils of Indifference, was given by Elie Wiesel with intention to persuade his audience that indifference is the downfall of humanity, and also to educate his audience about his conclusions about the Holocaust and the corresponding events. He was very successful in achieving those goals. Not only was the audience enlightened, but also President Bill Clinton, and the First Lady, Hillary Clinton, themselves were deeply touched by Wiesel’s words.
In the eyes of Elie Wiesel, author of Night, indifference whether it be in relationship abuse or another problem, is mentally damaging and needs to be eliminated. In his memoir, Night, Elie Wiesel illustrates how indifference can harm the mind of the victim when he says, “Never shall I forget the nocturnal silence that deprived me for all eternity of the desire to live,” (Night 34). In this, Wiesel is speaking of his first night in Auschwitz. When he mentions silence he is referring to the indifference that the Jews in concentration camps faced from the rest of the world. Wiesel refers to that night as the time he lost his desire to live because he saw so much indifference toward the suffering of the inmates and the horrific things that were happening to them. After this, his desire to stay alive was destroyed because he watched as the world stood by, indifferent to the senseless murder of millions. Throught this, Wiesel illustrates that indifference will impact people for the rest of their lives. Because indifference
Thus the theme of inhumanity can be seen through discrimination, fear and survival. Discrimination is seen when the Hungarian police beat the Jewish people because of their religion. Also, fear can be seen when Elie is whipped because Idek is afraid Elie would tell everyone of his affair. Lastly, survival is seen when the men beat each other for food. The reader can therefore conclude that what Elie Wiesel was trying to say about inhumanity was that other people are capable of treating other humans like animals and that it makes this victims feel less like people. This has implications about the real world and everyday life because there are maybe many instances throughout one’s life when they are being treated inhumanly. Additionally, many countries today suffer people are not being treated well, and the author seems to suggest that it should be stopped.
It was the end of the war and he no longer has a family after he was relocated and wiesel is basically a walking corpse. “And in spite of myself, a prayer formed inside me, a prayer to this God in whom I no longer believed.” was written in page 91 which clearly states that he no longer believed in God. Now the last piece of evidence to prove that he doesn't care for others anymore would by when his father left the land of the living. On page 112 Wiesel writes how he felt about his passing ‘And deep inside me, if I could have searched the recesses of my feeble conscience, I might have something like: Free at
The tone of the novel is greatly influenced through the fact that the story is autobiographical. There seems to be only one agenda utilized by Elie Wiesel in regards to the tone of the story as he presents the information for the readers’ evaluation. The point of the story is to provide the reader with an emotional link to the horror of the Holocaust through the eyes of one who experienced those horrors. Wiesel speaks from a distance that is often found in autobiographies. He presents the facts as to what he saw, thought, and felt during those long years in the camps.
To the people in the concentration camps, apathy is a “harsher punishment” (Wiesel) than anger or rage, because anger has feelings in it, while indifference just makes a suffering person feel even smaller and more insignificant. Indifference in humans potentially goes against religion, because it blurs the lines between “light and darkness” (Wiesel). Throughout his speech at the Millennium Lectures, Elie Wiesel both enlightens on the consequences of apathy towards those who need help, and inspires hope for a better future.
Wiesel’s loss of religion becomes the loss of identity, humanity, selfishness, and decency.... ... middle of paper ... ... This man is obviously beside himself and does not trust anyone except Hitler, his archenemy.
From being a bystander of bullying to committing murder are many ways of being indifferent. It is everywhere in everyday life in prospering countries and in poor and destroyed countries. Elie Wiesel knows how indifference feels and how it affects people. He was also indifferent and regrets what he did to this day. He was a victim of the Holocaust and lived through indifference. During his imprison ship he saw indifference everywhere in the camps. How he treated his father is what he regrets. He just cared about himself because another prisoner told him to. He believes his father died because he did not help him all he could. His whole book could be based on indifference if you interpreted it that way. From how the guards treated the prisoners to how kids including Elie treated their own parents. Indifference is a very big topic and a part of Night. Indifference is what pushed him to write his descriptive, emotional, strong, and outstanding novel.
Well-known Noble Peace prize winner, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, admonishing indifference and history in his time. Wiesel’s purpose is to impress upon the audience that being indifferent is as bad as committing the wrong doing. He creates warm, sentimental tone to convey to the audience his experience in the Holocaust and how he was treated. As well as making the point about the people who were indifferent and how they could’ve made a difference just by lending a helping hand.
Thesis- Elie Weisel argued his stance on indifference, successfully to his audiences, utilizing pathos, ethos, and logos.
Another typical characteristic of Wiesel’s pieces is employing logos as definition and description. Throughout The Perils of Indifference, Wiesel uses an extended and multifaceted definition of the term indifference. The author starts out by stating that “Etymologically, the word means ‘no difference’”, or in other words the most common definition of indifference is uniformity (The Perils of Indifference 1). Wiesel then further qualified this definition as an unfamiliar state of opposing ideas. Qualification. as known as clarification, of Wiesel’s definition of is vital to the development of Indifference in his piece is vital because it pinpoints exactly what the author want the audience to understand from his speech. By stating exactly what
Beginning in 1915, the Armenian massacre was an attempt to create a new compatible Turkish state. The prior religious and ethnic diversity within the Ottoman Empire had disappeared. The Ottoman Empire went from being diverse with multiple religious, now converted to a practically Muslim empire. The empire was now almost entirely Muslim, as well as a Turkish state. Turkish leaders soon realized that the only way to make up for the lost land and territories was to spread eastward and form a pure Turkish state. The Christian non-Turkish Armenians were an obstacle that would have to be faced in the process. In order to fulfill this was to force conversion of minorities in the country when that did not turnout, results quickly turned to massacres
The Holocaust was a plan to eliminate all indifferent people, such as, Jews, homosexuals, and intellectually disabled. In Elie Wiesel's, “The Perils of Indifference”, the author explains the pain of indifference and the struggles of the groups of people throughout history that have lived with indifference. For example, the Jewish people had all of their rights, freedom, and happiness taken away from them. This cruel act of dehumanization resulted in the people being treated like farm animals led to a slaughter.
Human rights for all will never be met fully. There are always going to be people who will be deprived of these rights, or have them taken away by others. Humanity has barely even scratched the surface of using these rights, and haven’t even started on enforcing them for all.