The New Jim Crow Rhetorical Analysis

764 Words2 Pages

In her book, The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander put the reader in the middle of a fierce debate about racial oppression in the current United States. Through her explosive style of writing, she depicts a view of the United States incarceration system both objectively and through the eyes of regular people who she argues are beset by the system. Alexander’s dramatic use of language and rhetorical appeals displays to the reader what the prison system is like to the African-American population in the United States. On pages 140 and 141 in The New Jim Crow Alexander displays both of her writing techniques that draw the reader into argument. Alexander begins these pages with an epigraph of a quote by Fredrick Douglass. Douglass was a well-known abolitionist and an escaped slave. Although he was brought us through the institution, he was still …show more content…

She describes very blatantly and straightforward the treatment of criminals once they are released from prison. She argues that we treat criminals like they truly are lower than the rest of society; less than human. She then returns to her parallel of slavery. She returns to the major argument of the book by drawing a very clear parallel. She says, “Hundreds of years ago, our nation put those considered less than human in shackles; less than a hundred years ago, we relegated them to the other side of town; today we put them in cages” (141). Here Alexander makes a very clear, dramatic, shocking point. Her connection here is supposed to stun the reader; she’s aiming for shock value. She also returns to another strategy that she uses throughout her book by describing a habit that the reader may commonly do. She points out how the phrase “being treated like a criminal” implies being treated less than human. She uses the stereotypes found throughout the United States as evidence of her

Open Document