The Mummy's Foot Short Story

1053 Words3 Pages

Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown,” Gauthier’s “The Mummy’s Foot,” and Mérimée’s “The Venus of Ille,” put forward the idea that the fantastic genre is a reflection and a critique of societal issues. In the aforementioned short stories, the authors reflect on and critique societal issues that troubled people of the mid-nineteenth century: religion, commercialism and intellectualism.
First, Hawthorne blatantly critiques religion and its hierarchy of power; the protagonist in “Young Goodman Brown” is convinced (in a dream state or not) that those in his community, including the higher ups of the church, defect to the devil.
Second, the protagonist in Gautier’s “The Mummy’s Foot” is consumed by the idea of owning a “special” paperweight, one that …show more content…

The protagonist, a young Parisian writer, purchases a mummy’s foot, on that would “suit [him] as a paper-weight; for [he] cannot endure those trumpery bronzes which the stationers sell, which may be found on everyone’s desk” (Gautier, 13). This conflicts with the protagonist’s previous comments, complaining that “every petty stockbroker” (12) must have his own collection of rare antiques. This critique, within the story, as well as the protagonist’s obsession with a unique paperweight, reflects on the idea of commercialist desires being petty and unnecessarily materialistic. Further into the story, the protagonist is thrust into “a fluid and grayish expanse” (15) and later arrives in what seems to be ancient Egypt and consults with the pharaoh Xixouthros, the father of Hemonithis, whose foot the protagonist restores. In this portion of the story, it seems as though the protagonist no longer owns his prized paper-weight, but that his paper-weight owns him. He is invited to consult with the pharaoh, rejected by him when he asks for the hand of his daughter, claiming “the last particles of your dust will have been scattered abroad by the winds” (17) when Xixouthros would “be present on the last day of the world” (17). This contrast and reversal of “ownership” exemplifies, symbolically, the challenge to the new commercialist society that was developing in France at the

Open Document