The Mexican banditry has appeared in many forms of culture since the early nineteenth century. The book “Bandit Nation” talked about a cultural impact that banditry had on Mexico from the period of its independence to the Mexican Revolution. The bandits did not come up with their own name but the Mexican and the elites are the ones that gave the bandits their name. The bandits are the lower-class outlaws and rebels who resist exploitation and oppression (Preface page). The elites did not just give them that name because they were poor but because they would do criminal activities. Some Mexicans would see the bandits as good but others saw them as just using it as an excuse to be rebels. Some of the Mexicans saw the bandits as heroes and some of the ones seen as heroes were Francisco Villa and the ones that followed him which were Chucho el Roto, Heraclio Bernal, and Santanon. The bandits were giving Mexico a bad reputation and that’s why they were trying to put a stop to them. It made it seem like the Mexican people could not even control their own people.
The author Chris Frazer main thesis of the book “Bandit Nation” is that the bandits were a big impact during this period of time and were causing many disagreements within the people. It was causing many tragedies that many wanted to put a stop to and reduce the number of bandits. As hard as they tried to achieve this goal with many laws, it was nearly impossible to reduce the number of bandits that there was. The main idea was that some of the bandits were seen as primitives, criminals, or rebels but it just depended on their own class and nationality (Frazer, pg. 21). The bandits were seen as criminals because they would go around and rob things. In the 1820s the crime and b...
... middle of paper ...
...k to any one that wants to learn about the bandits because this book has good information about them, really went into detail, and it made everything easy to understand about them. According to Frazer, “Therefore, the elites relied on extraordinary decrees, practice that began during the first republic. The first and most stringent of these laws target bandits on the highway from Veracruz to New Mexico” (32). One strength was that the elites had influence on the laws to go against the bandits and the weakness is that the bandit did not have any one to help them out. Until this point the Mexican bandits continue to cast a shadow now in the present time with the narco-traffickers, robbers, and murders.
Reference
Frazer, Chris. Bandit Nation: A History of Outlaws and Cultural Struggle in Mexico, 1810-1920.
Lincoln: U of Nebraska, 2006. Print.
Mexico’s Attorney General’s Office (Procuraduria General de la Republica, PGR) had issued information related to the conformation of the seven principal drug cartels present at Mexico:
In this biographical paper, I will be exploring the history of Juan Cortina, a man who is a hero or bandit depending on who you ask, his historical significance, and then exploring what we know of Juan and what we can deduce about his personality.
He found many loves, had many children, gained and lost the respect of another country, and changed much of the fate of his own country. After shooting a man who harassed his sister, Villa “fled, spending six years on the run in the mountains. While there, he joined a group of fugitives and became a bandit” (Biography.com Editors). As the head of the house, Pancho kept things in order as well as he could without a father to help him. When he fled to become a bandit, his whole life changed to that of an ordinary man to an outlaw. This is what could be known as Villa’s transformation into Mexico’s most well-known rebel generals. People like Celia Garza, however, transitioned in a much different way. When asked about the experience by her grandson, she simply told him, “I was inspired so I took action.” “In 1910, while still living as a fugitive, Pancho Villa joined Francisco's Madero successful uprising against Mexican dictator Porfirio Díaz” (Biography.com Editors). Pancho’s crazy life led him from the life of a bandit to the life of a rebel general, respected by many who disagreed with the way the President ran the country. This in turn led to the fate of Mexico’s independence and a n immediate change in opinion towards the way Mexico was
Bowden’s idea of why this happened focused mainly on the old misunderstood traditions of the tribes living in Mexico. He shows how the friars, churches and icons took the blunt of the revolts force. Bowden points out the religious differences and similarities be...
Although Pancho Villa is known to be a rebel and a bandit, he wasn’t born into a life of crime. Due to an awful circumstance, in which a wealthy man attempted to rape his young sister, Pancho Villa killed the transgressor. Pancho Villa had no choice but to change his name, hide in the mountains, and live as an outlaw. Over the years he gained the public’s attention for being sneaky and cunning towards the wealthy, and generous amongst the poor. His popularity as a modern day Robin Hood caught the attention of Francisco Madero who promised change to the lower class if they fought alongside him. Azuela recounts some of the problems the poor people faced “…Government people who've declared war to the death on us, on all the poor.”(p7). Many soldiers were w...
For nearly 250 years they had learned the techniques, as shaped under Spanish rule, that allowed them to mine with great accuracy and efficiency. However, this lead to the targeting of these people by Anglo 's who were jealous of their skills. Hatred and prejudiced soon turned to unlawful actions that targeted these people because of their race. As outlined in the text, from the writings of Antonio Coronel, two persons of foreign decent were hung with no trial or jury following the accusation by an Anglo miner that they had stolen from them, and threats were made to any persons who so chose to get in the way that they would meet the same fate (p.171). In other states, such as Texas in which loathing toward Mexicans already reigned supreme, Mexican-Americans were pursued by the likes of the state appointed Texas Rangers, who routinely harassed their counterparts, and in some instances shot them dead for offenses that were not judged by a manner consistent with American judicial beliefs. These brutalities were the offset of an Anglo society that was still infused with the likes of war with Mexico, and driven by hatred for peoples of different covered skin (as can be visited through similar circumstances with American Indians and African Americans). Mexican-Americans found themselves in a deplorable situation: their
them, and little if any was given in return. The people who live among these
The corrido has been identified as having distinctive characteristics that make up its theme and plot. First, the corrido has a “context of hostile relations between Anglos and Mexicans along the border and the establishment of a scenic structure, geographical locale, and opposing social forces” (Mendoza 146). The corrido’s hero “is a hard-working, peace-loving Mexican, who, when goaded by Anglos, outrages into violence, causing him to defend his rights and those of others of his community against the rinches, the Rangers” (Saldívar). This hero “is quickly introduced in legendary proportions and defiant stature” and many people must die before the hero reaches his triumphant, but tragic, demise (Mendoza 146). The Anglos in the corrido, meanwhile, are not one-dimensional villains but “complex figures who contain positive as well as negative qualities” (Mendoza 146). These distinctive traits of a corrido – setting, conflict, and characterization, among others – ...
A Texan, William B. Travis and a small group of Texans attacked a squad of Mexican troops in Anahuac with the motive that “taxes should not thus be collected from them to support a standing army in their own country” (SOS 1) and soon drove them back. Travis retreated to San Felipe and were assisted to Bexar. Skirmishes and the threat of war with Mexico soon followed.
In 1876, Porfirio Diaz, an Indian general in the Mexican Army took control of the nation, and continued to be elected until 1910. This new era was too one way and started the Mexican Revolution. The government eventually allowed Mexico to fall into dictatorship that gave way to a new a powerful upper class. When Diaz came into power he had high hopes for Mexico's future, and established a stable government that rid the nation of crime. The quality of life improved around the towns and the cities.. The way the government worked was expanded when Diaz sent out his strong governors to rural areas. The military was made stronger by using more professional methods of training the soldiers. From this way of training came a military police force called the Rurales made of thousands of troops. This police force kept order and enforced Diazs' laws. Diaz also co...
The Mexican Revolution began November 20th, 1910. It is disputable that it extended up to two decades and seized more than 900,000 lives. This revolution, however, also ended dictatorship in Mexico and restored the rights of farm workers, or peons, and its citizens. Revolutions are often started because a large group of individuals want to see a change. These beings decided to be the change that they wanted to see and risked many things, including their lives. Francisco “Pancho” Villa and Emiliano Zapata are the main revolutionaries remembered. These figures of the revolution took on the responsibility that came with the title. Their main goal was to regain the rights the people deserved. The peons believed that they deserved the land that they labored on. These workers rose up in a vehement conflict against those opposing and oppressing them. The United States was also significantly affected by this war because anybody who did not want to fight left the country and migrated north. While the end of the revolution may be considered to be in the year of 1917 with the draft of a new constitution, the fighting did not culminate until the 1930’s.
When Spaniards colonized California, they invaded the native Indians with foreign worldviews, weapons, and diseases. The distinct regional culture that resulted from this union in turn found itself invaded by Anglo-Americans with their peculiar social, legal, and economic ideals. Claiming that differences among these cultures could not be reconciled, Douglas Monroy traces the historical interaction among them in Thrown Among Strangers: The Making of Mexican Culture in Frontier California. Beginning with the missions and ending in the late 1800s, he employs relations of production and labor demands as a framework to explain the domination of some groups and the decay of others and concludes with the notion that ?California would have been, and would be today, a different place indeed if people had done more of their own work.?(276) While this supposition may be true, its economic determinism undermines other important factors on which he eloquently elaborates, such as religion and law. Ironically, in his description of native Californian culture, Monroy becomes victim of the same creation of the ?other? for which he chastises Spanish and Anglo cultures. His unconvincing arguments about Indian life and his reductive adherence to labor analysis ultimately detract from his work; however, he successfully provokes the reader to explore the complexities and contradictions of a particular historical era.
Mexico’s drugs wars as well as bloody drug cartels are echoed in a controversial folk music genre commonly known as narco corridos or simply as drug ballads. They tell the stories allied to shootouts, drug lords, betrayals including daring criminal operations. Narco corridos are not a new style in Mexican music, in fact, they have been around for years, and they are popular among the old and the young. This genre has evolved to be modern fugitive music that fuses the emotional responses of antique ballads with the tense gravel of mobster rap. From global idols to rural artists documenting their neighborhood current events in the regions subjugated by guerilla war, narco corridos provides the songwriters in their homes with unique but artistic superiority, investigating the heartland of the infamous Mexican drug trafficking as well as publicizing municipal midpoints such as Los Angeles, in addition to Mexico City.
"For the commercial insurgency, border controls are perfunctory in "free trade" areas, and there is still a great demand for goods that are linked to smuggling" (PRISM Issue No 3). President Calderon's term in office has seen numerous arrests and significant cooperation with U.S. law enforcement, and intelligence activities, which has negated the freedom of movement the cartels once enjoyed. It has also prompted them to seek other venues to keep their revenue flowing. The arrests aren't without criticisms. Due to recent arrests of ...
The history of political instability in Mexico and its need for revolution is very complex and dates back to the colonization of Mexico by the Spaniards in the 1500s. However, many aspects of the social situation of Mexico when the Revolution broke out can be attributed to the thirty-year dictatorship of President Porfrio Diaz, prior to 1911. The Revolution began in November of 1910 in an effort to overthrow the Diaz dictatorship. Under the Diaz presidency, a small minority of people, primarily relatives and friends, were in ...