The Importance of Act 1 Scene 2 of William Shakespeare's King Lear
In a play of immense grandeur, Shakespeare has created within King
Lear; a character so depraved that he appears to step beyond the
realms of forgiveness. Act 1ii is the keystone of King Lear - its
significance and influence radiates throughout the whole of the play.
Interwoven with and parallel to the central story line, the subplot is
used to enhance and develop the key themes of this tragic masterpiece.
The scene also begins the plot to crack the ‘bond…‘twixt son and
father’. Driven by a selfish desire to displace his brother, and
through his imperious and cunning performance, Edmund reveals to us a
devious nature that we must question: does this Machiavellian
malcontent have a worthy motivation?
In addition to using Act 1ii as a device for divulging Edmund’s
intent, we see themes developing that establish themselves as the
basis for the play.
In this scene, we see Edmund challenging the society and its
traditions as he questions his illegitimacy and his social status,
‘Why brand they us/ With ‘base’?’. His deprivation in society and
being seen as lower and inferior to his brother questions the
prejudices of society. When speaking to Edgar of his beliefs that
‘sons of perfect age’ should manage their father’s revenue, Edmund is
basically stating that the old order such as King Lear and his father,
Gloucester, should allow youth to take their place, ‘the younger rises
when the old doth fall’.
The theme of age is central to both plots. This partition between the
age groups is dealt with throughout the whole of the play. Whilst
Edmund’s focus is to over...
... middle of paper ...
... believing in
such things. Evidently so, the wheel has come full circle.
In my opinion, I believe that Act 1ii offers a foundation to which the
rest of the play is built upon. It sets the base on which the plots of
Lear and Edmund are constructed, and therefore its importance is
irrefutable. It links all aspects of various different themes, both
major and minor, together, to create what ultimately is, ‘The Tragedy
of King Lear’. In tragic pathos, in dramatic force, in grandeur of
sentiment and diction, Lear has no superior in all the wide range of
the world’s drama. The language is sublime, and this Shakespearean
tragedy has the advantage of dealing with human beings, human
passions, and human frailties, especially those of the continuing
complexities of the family, sibling rivalries, greed aging, power and
love.
shall firstly do a summery of the play and give a basic image of what
...rall effectiveness of the play by allowing the audience to make personal connections with the characters as well as strengthening the theme threads.
In order to understand the main idea of the play, it is important to understand details of the background of the author as it will help to illustrate a possible connection to the play.
project of the play, of which is touched upon in Act One. It is this
whether he was really in love with Rosaline, or did he just want to be
meanings along with what is going on in the plot of the play, it is
The Consequences of Decisions in King Lear by William Shakespeare King Lear is a detailed description of the consequences of one man's decisions. This fictitious man is Lear, King of England, who's decisions greatly alter his life and the lives of those around him. As Lear bears the status of King he is, as one expects, a man of great power but sinfully he surrenders all of this power to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him. This untimely abdication of his throne results in a chain reaction of events that send him through a journey of hell. King Lear is a metaphorical description of one man's journey through hell in order to expiate his sin.
themes of the play and helps us gain insight on other characters. I find the following quote to be
The Dramatic Significance of Act 3, Scene 1 in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet, one of the most famous love stories ever written. It is a typical love story, girl meets boy, and they like each other, but they had distinctive troubles, as their families were feuding, thus they are unable to see each other. In this play though, there is a difference, it has dramatic significance. Dramatic significance is when the play has depth and meaning, which influences the rest of the story. Romeo kills Juliet's cousin, Tybalt, which results in Romeo being banished from Verona.
The play is structured so that the climax, or rather the main premise of the play, appears near the beginning; al...
King Lear is a perfect demonstration of the great consequences one man's actions can cause. While there are certainly religious Christian elements to the story, the story is not one of morality or hope. King Lear is a lesson, making an example of what can come of a single, foolish, egotistical action. King Lear's action is the surrendering of his throne to his daughters.
Shakespeare's King Lear is a play which shows the consequences of one man's decisions. The audience follows the main character, Lear, as he makes decisions that disrupt order in his Kingdom. When Lear surrenders all his power and land to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him, the breakdown on order in evident. Lear's first mistake is to divide his Kingdom into three parts. A Kingdom is run best under one ruler as only one decision is made without contradiction. Another indication that order is disrupted is the separation of Lear's family. Lear's inability to control his anger causes him to banish his youngest daughter, Cordelia, and loyal servant, Kent. This foolish act causes Lear to become vulnerable to his other two daughters as they conspire against him. Lastly, the transfer of power from Lear to his eldest and middle daughter, Goneril and Regan, reveals disorder as a result of the division of the Kingdom. A Kingdom without order is a Kingdom in chaos. When order is disrupted in King Lear, the audience witnesses chaotic events that Lear endures, eventually learning who truly loves him.
King Lear is at once the most highly praised and intensely criticized of all Shakespeare's works. Samuel Johnson said it is "deservedly celebrated among the dramas of Shakespeare" yet at the same time he supported the changes made in the text by Tate in which Cordelia is allowed to retire with victory and felicity. "Shakespeare has suffered the virtue of Cordelia to perish in a just cause, contrary to the natural ideas of justice, to the hope of the reader, and, what is yet more strange, to the faith of chronicles."1 A.C. Bradley's judgement is that King Lear is "Shakespare's greatest work, but it is not...the best of his plays."2 He would wish that "the deaths of Edmund, Goneril, Regan and Gloucester should be followed by the escape of Lear and Cordelia from death," and even goes so far as to say: "I believe Shakespeare would have ended his play thus had he taken the subject in hand a few years later...."3
When one examines the words “pride” and “self-respect”, it is possible one may assume that the two are identical in meaning. That the words go hand in hand like butter and bread. For quite some time I was pondering on the meaning of the two words “pride” and “self-respect”. The more consideration I put into the two the deeper I was in a maze of confusion. After a long thought on the subject I had come to my own conclusion.
How the Sub-Plot Mirrors the Main Plot in King Lear by William Shakespeare One can say that the sub plot does mirror the main plot to some extent. Some are in subtle ways and some are in the more obvious ways. Shakespeare has two plots in order to intensify the main theme of tragedy that runs throughout this play. The main plot is in which King Lear is the tragic hero however it is clear that just by misfortune he is deprived of something very valuable to him by error of judgment and this is immediately highlighted in the first scene of Act one where he goes through a rapid transition of loving to hating his only truly loyal daughter Cordelia.