The Importance Of Woodstock

921 Words2 Pages

“One long-haired teen-ager summed up the significance of Woodstock quite simply: ‘People,’ he said, ‘are finally getting together.’” In August of 1969, the world of music changed as a result of a three-day festival known as the Woodstock Music and Art Fair. Woodstock was an iconic moment for the generation of young people in the United States at the time. Even so, the news coverage of the event did not always give justice to the great festival and all that it stood for. The approach in which certain major newspapers and magazines around the country chose to cover the breaking story did not strongly emphasis the importance of the event’s cultural significance. Rather, the news outlets chose to focus on logistical problems surrounding the event, such as crowd size and public safety issues, a conventional media routine that was common in the reporting of major events at the time. This type of reporting proved inadequate in the coverage of Woodstock. This inadequacy affected how Woodstock was perceived. Woodstock is thought to be one of the major events of the 1960s, but its media coverage did not give justice to all that the event stood for. Woodstock changed the world of music and the ways in which mainstream media outlets framed the coverage of the festival aided in this change.
The Woodstock Music and Art Fair was a weekend-long festival that took place in rural Bethel, New York from August 15 to August 18, 1969. As described in an August of 1969 issue of Life magazine, “The original plan was for an outdoor rock festival, “three days of peace and music” in the Catskill village of Woodstock. What the young promoters got was the third largest city in New York state, population 400,000 (give or take 100,000), location Max Y...

... middle of paper ...

...neration of young people attained a critical mass for three days in a rural New York meadow. As such, it had far-reaching political implications and could be construed to pose a threat to society's ruling elites. Thus, by focusing on negative, threatening images, such as the widespread drug use and deteriorating public safety at Woodstock, the coverage tended to reinforce the social order of the establishment. At the same time, the coverage posed disturbing questions about the mindset of Woodstock attendees and consequently appeared to marginalize the young generation's political standing.” Those who attended the weekend-long festival have been quoted saying that Woodstock changed their lives, and some academics and journalism experts have noted that the way the media approached popular culture also shifted significantly with the coverage of the three-day festival.

Open Document