The Importance Of Texting In The Written Language

1262 Words3 Pages

As most people that own a cell phone, I am a fan of texting. Texting is a way of communication, a short hand for this generation. I would rather text than call a person to ask one simple question that would draw out a long conversation that would waste time and precious minutes on a cell phone bill. David Crystal is a linguistics professor at the University of Wales in his essay “2b or Not 2b “describes in detail on why texting has made our generation’s writing and spelling skills improve. Since the modern print was invented the “people” that Crystal referred to have always had issues with technology, can technology over pass human emotion in terms of language, shorter faster might not always be better. I, for the most part, agree with his …show more content…

Cell phones of this time have a vast amount of technology that goes with them. There is auto correct for those of us using smart phones and spell check to allow people that want to type out everything in whole to revise and edit the words in which they have intended to use. Spell check personally helps me to finish the words that I have a hunch on how to spell words, but I’m not entirely sure, and I am not sure, call it laziness it’s just easier. I do not believe that any of the words used by John Sutherland of University College London, in the article to describe the new era of texting are correct. According to Sutherland writing in his paper in 2002, it is "bleak, bald, sad shorthand. Drab shrink talk. Linguistically it 's all pig 's ear. It masks dyslexia, poor spelling and mental laziness. Texting is penmanship for …show more content…

You cannot just abbreviate any and every word. I think to condemn the new texting language (Sutherland 2002) as a “digital virus” is wrong. I do feel somewhat silly using certain abbreviations and I want to feel like I am well-spoken correct punctuation, proper verb forms and tense, the use of the right words at the right times. Some situations we find ourselves in force us to put constraints on our messages. Social networking sites such as Facebook and twitter put a character limit on the sum of text allowed in one status or tweet. Rather than start a new message people would rather go back and modify some words and shorten them in order to fit them into the limitation of the site. If you are composing a tweet that just slightly surpasses the given text amount why erase it or start a whole new message when you can just simply remove some letters and use logic to figure out another way to get the message out. Crystal mentions several text message novels that would be rather annoying for this 31 year old mother of three, who just wants to read a book and not try to figure out what SMH

Open Document