More handpicked essays just for you.
Patient rights and responsibility importance
Patients rights and importance
Ethics of medical informed consent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Patient rights and responsibility importance
Respect for Autonomy – Respect the patient’s right to make their own decisions. Provide patients with information needed to make an independent and educated medical decision. Autonomy requires that medical professionals provide all the information needed for an informed consent, withholding absolutely no information. Technology has allowed patients more access for information after diagnosis. Physicians are able to refer patients to articles, provide pamphlets, or provide information through web sites about risks, outcomes, and other useful patient care information. Example: An online physician provides medical advice through a message board. Is the physician capable of providing all the information needed for informed consent? Is the Respect
Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient
According to Terrence F. Ackerman, as of the 1980s the American Medical Association had to include the respect for a person’s autonomy as a principle of medical ethics (Ackerman 14, 1982). This includes having the physician provide all the medical information to the patient even if the information could cause negative implication onto the patient. The physician is also expected to withhold all information of the patient from 3rd parties (Ackerman 14, 1982). Although it is seen as standard in today’s world, in
Patient autonomy was the predominant concern during the time of publication of both Ezekiel and Linda Emanuel, and Edmund D. Pellegrino and David C. Thomasma's texts. During that time, the paternalistic model, in which a doctor uses their skills to understand the disease and choose a best course of action for the patient to take, had been replaced by the informative model, one which centered around patient autonomy. The latter model featured a relationship where the control over medical decisions was solely given to the patient and the doctor was reduced to a technical expert. Pellegrino and Thomasma and the Emanuel’s found that the shift from one extreme, the paternalistic model, to the other, the informative model, did not adequately move towards an ideal model. The problem with the informative model, according to the Emanuel’s, is that the autonomy described is simple, which means the model “presupposes that p...
his own life how he wishes, even if it will damage health or lead to
Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment. As a physician, he must respect the patient’s autonomy. For a patient to be an autonomous agent, he must have legitimate moral values. The patient has all the rights to his medical health and conditions that arise. When considering informed consent, the patient must be aware and should be able to give a voluntary consent for the treatment and testing without being coerced, even if coercion is very little. Being coerced into giving consent is not voluntary because others people’s opinions account for part of his decision. Prisoners and the poor population are two areas where coercion is found the most when giving consent. Terminally ill patients also give consent in hope of recovering from their illness. Although the possibilities are slim of having a successful recovery, they proceed with the research with the expectation of having a positive outcome. As stated by Raab, “informed consent process flows naturally from the ‘partnership’ between physician and patient” (Raab). Despite the fact that informed consent is supposed to educate the patients, it is now more of an avoidance of liability for physicians (Raab). Although the physician provides adequate information to his patient, how can he ensure that his patient properly ...
Autonomy is a concept found in moral, political, and bioethical reasoning. Inside these connections, it is the limit of a sound individual to make an educated, unpressured decision. Patient autonomy can conflict with clinician autonomy and, in such a clash of values, it is not obvious which should prevail. (Lantos, Matlock & Wendler, 2011). In order to gain informed consent, a patient
The aim of the analysis is meant to clarify the meaning of the word autonomy thereby the introduction of a concept. Clarification is needed as the word autonomy does have several meanings and not all apply to medical terminology, some meanings span to philosophy, technology and general decision making. The medical meaning is significant in the care of patients for improved outcomes through choice and educated decision making on the part of the patient. Autonomy can be empowering as a concept or even as a single word.
The principle of autonomy states, that an individual’s decision must be respected in all cases, also an individual can act freely in accordance to their plan. For example, in a case where a patient and family demands to continue medical or surgical care and a physician want the patient to stop further treatment. In this case the patient’s choice will matter the most. According to the principle of autonomy it will be the patients and family choice whether to continue or discontinue treatment. The principle of beneficence which states, “one must promote good” comes into play in this case. In accordance to beneficence the patient will not benefit from the physicians responses personally. He/she will not benefit from harming her body with more surgeries. The patient will be going against the principle non-maleficence, which states that “one must cause no harm to an individual” by causing harm to herself. In this case the physician is justified in his/her actions by discontinuing medical or surgical care to the patient because it will not it her. These principles are what healthcare provider use to help and guide patients with the ...
Technological advances enable nurses to provide accurate, timely care for a patient. This is due to the fact that these advances enable doctors and nurses to quickly diagnose, explain and predict the health-illness status of a patient, thus allowing health care professionals to spend less time finding answers, and more time providing quality care. For nurses, this includes spending time with the patient establishing rapport, communication and a trusting relationship for optimum clinical care.
The Obsession of Personal Autonomy: Is the American fixation of individual freedom a good idea? Or do other cultures around the world know how to make good decisions based on their beliefs? Americans are known around the world for being culturally obsessed with idea of choice. As Americans in our culture we practice our right of self-expression and personal choice in many ways throughout life. From the simple act of deciding what kind of profession we want to pursue for the rest of our lives to the decision of what kind of dress we want to wear on a date.
A patient who insists on receiving chemotherapy, despite going against medical advice, should be allowed to receive treatment for their terminal cancer. The decision to allow a patient to receive chemotherapy can be guided using the ethical principles of autonomy, truthfulness and informed consent. Autonomy, defined as a “ right to make independent decisions concerning one’s own life and well-being” includes four distinct components, describing autonomy as: “free action, effective deliberation, authenticity and moral reflection” (Yeo & Moorhouse, 1996). Autonomy as free action, defined as “being able to do what one wishes to do” (Yeo & Moorhouse, 1996), can be used to show that any decision a patient makes is their own personal right.
When a medical condition is extremely rare, there is the potential for the Internet to aid the patient in becoming more knowledgeable about their condition—potentially even more knowledgeable than their physician. With help from technology/the Internet, patients are becoming more well-informed about their health and are advocating for themselves by expressing their realistic concerns with their physicians. Knowledge is power and seeking knowledge about your own healthcare enables you to ask the deeper and more important questions of your physician. In summary, access to healthcare related information through advanced technologies such as the Internet enables the patient to feel as if they are on the same level of understanding as their physician, which therefore helps to eradicate feelings of inadequacy on the patient’s behalf. In turn, patients are able to share the knowledge the gathered and physicians can eliminate misconceptions/misunderstanding, while allowing for open communication between the patient and the provider.
The American Nurses Association Code of Ethics for Nurses has five elements that pertain to the Principle of Autonomy. Each individual element applies to “respect individual persons” (Baillie, McGeehan, Garrett T, M., Garrett R. M., 2013, p.33). In Chapter 2 of the Health Care ethics: Principles and problems text, it discusses thouroghly the consent of an individual to make their own decisions regarding their health and future requests of care. As a nurse or within all heath care professions, we must treat each individual patient with care, respect, and to remain mindful to the patient regarding any aspect of their lives. In the ANA Code of Ethics for Nurses, it explains ways of maintaining the empathy required in the health field. It further discusses that the respect for human dignity must be a priority, relationships to patients must remain neutral, the severity of the situation, the right to self-rule, and the professionalism that must be upheld by the nurse and their associates.
First, the Internet has allowed an easy way for patients to access medical information. The main source of medical information before the invention of the Internet was physicians. Medical books and journal articles were difficult to find in the standard library. Patients in the 21st Century can read or download E-books and medical journals online and educate themselves about the physiological processes associated with the medical conditions affecting them. This phenomenon has changed the physician-client relationship from a linear relationship to a triangular relationship.
We support an individual’s autonomy and ability to make their own decisions, determine their own goals and aspirations, and live as they choose to We actively support people to find and use their own voice We believe that each individual is capable and has their own inner strength & wisdom Individuals have the right to guide the services they receive As peers we are of equal standing with each other We value the understanding that comes from our similar lived experience We are equals in a supportive relationships and can each learn & grow as a result