Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Components of quality of health care
Quality of care in healthcare essay
Essay on quality of care in health care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Components of quality of health care
Quality of care in healthcare was not previously measured or reported due to the ultimate trust that patients had in their care providers that what was prescribe or treatment given was necessary and appropriate. As society has evolved healthcare has undergone changes that has significant impacted the way in which healthcare is practiced. A landmark in the quality movement in health care has been the publication of the Institute of Medicine 's (IOM) report “To err is human: building a safer health system” of 1993, which serve to usher in an era of care focused on improving quality, and ultimately a culture of evidence-based care (De Jonge, Nicolaas, Van Leerdam & Kuipers, 2011).
The IOM released a second report, “Crossing the quality chasm”
…show more content…
The problems of healthcare that impact quality such as medical errors, health insurance, shortage of healthcare personnel are issues that contribute to a lack of trust in health care systems. Rendering quality care should be appropriate to the need and specific actions taken in accordance to the individual need. Meltzer & Chung (2014), suggest that although quality improvement may sometimes reduce costs, the financial resources, time, and effort available for quality improvement are limited-whether within a single hospital, a payer network, a state, or a …show more content…
Spending on quality improvements generally implies a trade-off against other activities, and focusing on specific quality indicators may divert resources away from other indicators or other components of health care. Thus, it is imperative to determine what measures will produce changes in care that result in the greatest improvements in health care quality and reductions in disparities in health between groups of people, (Meltzer & Chung,
According to the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, they have assessed the nation’s health system annually since 2003, reported that, in 2015 the health care delivery system has made progress to achieve the three aims of better care, smarter spending, and healthier people (City of White Plains Health Equity Report, 2017). However, they continue to promote health equality and reach the goal of New York State being the healthiest. But most importantly aiming to reduce or eliminate racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health
SGH has been plagued with patient quality issues, therefore SGH finds itself in a situation which is inherently antithetical to the mission of the hospital. The costs of healthcare continue to rise at an alarming rate, and hospital boards are experiencing increased scrutiny in their ability, and role, in ensuring patient quality (Millar, Freeman, & Mannion, 2015). Many internal actors are involved in patient quality, from the physicians, nurses, pharmacists and IT administrators, creating a complex internal system. When IT projects, such as the CPOE initiative fail, the project team members, and the organization as a whole, may experience negative emotions that impede the ability to learn from the experience (Shepherd, Patzelt, & Wolfe, 2011). The SGH executive management team must refocus the organization on the primary goal of patient
Managers, clinicians, nurses, and doctors in hospitals are continuously confronted by new technologies and methods that require changes to working practice. Quality systems can help to manage change while maintaining a high quality of care. The quality of care is the measurement of how a hospital operates and how satisfied its patients are with the care they are receiving there. Today, post ACA implementation all hospitals depend on the quality of care. Hospitals may face penalties if they are struggling with the quality of health care delivery.
The primary information from the IOM report indicated that the reason for poor quality care was indeed inadequate performance reporting procedures (Sadeghi, 2013). With that said, another point to consider is that health administrator often times get anxieties when dealing with criticism from the public. This problem could result in expensive litigation. This can affect the organization’s in terms of quality and finance. This creates inadequacy in how problems are detected, solutions identified and resolutions brought about. Given the original Hippocratic Oath, which includes the commitment to First, Do No Harm as a guiding principle, these errors are unacceptable (Sadeghi, 2013). First Do No Harm is an esteemed proverb often traced to Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Oath that for a long time functioned as an essential admonition in the ethics of physicians and other health-care providers (HIGGS, R., 2017). There may well be other influencing factors; however, it does appear as though these have contributed to
Improving quality of care in the healthcare system begins with the patients. According to the Institute of medicine, (IOM), the deaths per year that were caused by medical errors were estimated between 44,000 to 98,000. Medical errors are common to occur in today’s complex healthcare system, even though, hospitals and all other healthcare organizations regularly provide in-services to their staff and train them in regards to new changes in the healthcare. In addition, the health care system also provides counseling to patients who are affected by the errors and to their families afterwards. Still, medical errors still continue to occur. Hence, the healthcare profession continues to implement new methods that can help in improving
Improving Quality and Value in the U.S. Health Care System . (2009, August). Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2009/08/21-bpc-qualityreport
First, people think that it’s a tradeoff: you either work on quality or you work on efficiency. Efficiency could be looked at as effective because the solution comes quickly. However, the solution may not completely eradicate the patient’s full problems because it was analyzed in a short amount of time. This can cause mistrust between the patient and the healthcare provider. Second, people often assume quality costs more. In fact, if we think about quality from the patient’s eyes, the person who’s seeking the service, there’s a lot of waste in that system and we have to consider cost and quality together. To patients, waste is frustration and unnecessary use of their time and energy. We can understand it by measuring what they value and meet their needs. The challenge is to ask the question: what are we going to do to make care better so it’s more affordable for the person paying for insurance, paying co-pays and using the care delivery system? When speaking in terms of ethics, quality would win over efficiency since the healthcare provider and healthcare system acknowledges a patient’s essential demands and not be concerned about
What is quality healthcare? The Institute of Medicine defines healthcare quality as the extent to which health services provided to individuals and patient populations improves the desired health outcomes. The care should be based on the strongest clinical evidence as we know it, Evidence Based Practice. This care should be provided in a technologically and culturally competent manner with strong communication skills and shared decision making. This puts the burden of quality on the profession as a whole not on just a few individuals. The sum of qual...
Thus, it is imperative that evidence-based practice is conducted to provide the best current, valid and reliable evidence in an aim to close the gap between non-conformity and coincide with the professional obligation of providing the patient with the best possible care (Liamputtong, 2013).... ... middle of paper ... ... Patient safety and quality of care. Rockville, MD: Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality, U.S. Dept. of Health.
The field of health care has seen remarkable accomplishments achieved within the past few decades. One of the more significant changes is seen in the field of public health; and the shift in perspective that health organizations are having in the areas of prevention and treatment of diseases. The idea of providing a more patient-centered experience and being accessible to patients in order to improve their health outcome is steadily on the rise. All of these accomplishments, to include the Affordable Care Act has initiated innovation between treatment, prevention, and cost effectiveness in providing quality service. In moving forward, it is important that health care organizations as well as future and current health care professionals have an understanding of the future of health care delivery.
The goal of quality improvement (QI) is to improve patient care, processes, outcomes, and manage risk. Ethical consideration to be addressed in accordance with this QI project involve protection of human rights, beneficence, and justice.
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) highlights six aims for improvement in the health care system (Sadeghi et al., 2013). In summary these are: safe by providing appropriate care, effective at providing services based on scientific knowledge exclusively to persons who could benefit, patient-centered by providing health care tailored to the patient’s preferences, timely by avoiding delays in administering health care, efficient in waste management, and equitable by enhancing fair and unbiased care to all patients.
Yet, as todays hospital ratings do not mirror that of the Toyota business, a demand for quality grows greater and tighter in various health care settings. Presently, health care has the task of seeking ways to avoid waste in its rising health care cost and streamline its cost and product quality. In order to achieve this everyone has to make a conscious effort to provide quality care and avoid the costly
In the 21st century, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported that many medical incidents have occurred by human error so they expressed to build a safer health system to reduce the error and provide the high quality of care to patients. Summed up the literature, quality defined that healthcare workers followed the current professional standards to apply in the patient care and prevention of unnecessary harm, and achieve patient’s expectations. IOM also identified that the concept of quality has included six key elements which are effective, timely, equitable, efficient, patient-centered and safe. Moreover, leadership has needed to monitor and manage the improvement process due to different of elements have affected the quality