The Importance Of Emotions In Oral History

923 Words2 Pages

For the most part, oral history originates from witnesses, who are often emotionally involved with the events in question. These emotions can easily influence the interpretation and understanding of an event/moment in history, leading us to form biases or gain an inaccurate understanding of the event. While this emotional involvement adds interest and engagement, it is however not entirely beneficial to historians who need more objective accounts in order to ‘balance different perspectives’. Emotion has sometimes been viewed as an unreliable way of knowing. Emotions have, such as, been criticized as being illogical obstacles to knowledge that alter and falsify our image of reality (History as an AOK, Mendes).

History is an area of knowledge that may not prove the truth but, if we examine the evidence thoroughly, and use our own empirical knowledge impartially, we can go some way towards providing a correct account of what happened in the past. Similarly, there are some very present downsides to using history knowledge as the only source. Nationalism and the emotional aspect of it plays a large part in skewing the past of a county or culture through commemoration and holidays that glorify and promote a specific event. When in fact, many might not realize the true reason of celebration because of the level of patriotism and loyalty to the Nation. It becomes hard to stay completely objective during all the celebration because of the emotions felt.

However, using emotions is not all bad and misleading. Some consider that not only do emotions help make sense of social and cultural experiences and behaviors, but they are also the source of specific ethical and political knowledge by helping us form an understanding of the world arou...

... middle of paper ...

...tion. Known as empiricism, when all knowledge is ultimately based on perceptual experience. The problem is that each of our senses are somewhat limited, because each sense has a threshold beyond which we cannot perceive. Even with instruments and devices such as the telescope and x-rays that we extend our field of perception with, there will always be something that we lack. When only using perception, we have to remember to be cautious about what the senses tell us because perception is selective and interpretations can be misled. Each of us has been mistaken about something we thought we saw or heard. Although we often treat facts as if they were infallibly certain, they aren’t. When perception cannot give us certainty, if the evidence of our senses is consistent with what reason and intuition tell us, it can still offer a good foundation for reliable knowledge.

Open Document