Analyzing the fashion during the depression years demonstrates that during this generation, World War II had a profound impact on women’s clothing by imposing many limitations in which creating a lasting impression on women’s fashion.
Women were now being encouraged to join the work place and replaced men in jobs such as in offices and factories. Women turned to more of a traditional style of life. This made it more acceptable for women to wear trousers in public. Women’s clothing became very limited. Individuals were granted 60 points each for clothing per year. For example, the point system worked as followed a women’s dress would cost 11 points, and women’s shoes would cost 7. The women were limited to what could be accessed for fashion,
…show more content…
These styles are still found in clothing today. Due to the shortage of materials the difference in social classes were not as clear. The new style of dressing became similar under government rules. There were bans placed on imported materials so clothes where made from government fabric, which were plain and practical. Clothing was not allowed to have draping, or pleats this was considered a waste of fabric. Garments where used for functional purposes only so women dawned jewelry and make up as decoration and self-idenfication
There were many limitations placed on the designers and beauty manufactures.
Clothes were made with a goal to be kept simple short and narrow due to these shortages and rationing of clothing.
“If you don’t nee it don’t buy it “was the slogan plastered on many advertisements. This was in efforts to get people to save, Materials were scarce for war supplies. In changing the mindset of consumers the new goal was to Converse rather than splurge. This produced a drastic change in the country materials and factories originally associated with clothing were used for the war. The government launched the “ make do and mend “ campaign which intended to pursued people to take care of the clothes they have and fix them if torn or damaged instead of disposing and purchasing new
The attire of the period had variants sometimes when it came to age, social class, economic position, and even job placement. These factors made a difference in style of clothing, style of sleeves, choice of fabric, and amount of fabric used in a garment. A rich woman might buy very expensive brocade for her dress where a poorer woman might simply buy a singular colored wool or cotton. When the war arrived, cotton and silk increased, making it harder to obtain (Mitchell 4). It was these fabrics; wool, silk, muslin, linen, etc., that made the weight of the whole outfit so heavy and awkward.
During the World War II, women's role were focused on one thing, taking over what used to be the roles of men. Although jobs such as nurses, teachers, textiles and so on were still classified as a “woman's job” the war provided them a gateway to work in munitions factories, earning the name Munitionettes. In these factories the women worked in all manner of production ranging from making ammunition to uniforms to aeroplanes. During the war there was rationing of clothes so it became harder to find material which bought on the problem of too little material. The women working in the factories stuck to their head scarves to keep their hair out of the way, the overalls were worn for the simple fact that it was easy, comfortable and quick to wear. Large handbags were carried to keep rationing books in, the axillary military workers kept to their strict uniform composed of a suit with colours in black, brown, grey and sometimes blue. Relating to my essay, this shows how women in the 40's/50's wore less clothes in order to do the work of men, showing their strength and how the fashion of work attires has changed. Comparing to today's popular outfit for women who work in the working class group, they wear pantsuits and heels, pencil skirts and blouses with a blazer, cooperate dresses. Although the style and colour and fittin...
From the conventional Victorian dresses of the 1800’s to the rock-and-roll tee shirts of the 1980’s, American culture has experienced incredibly diverse trends in clothing. This ever changing timeline of fashion provokes the question: what is the cause of such differing styles? By considering the state of society throughout the eras, it can be seen that clothing directly correlates with the current way of life. Specifically, American women’s fashion of the 1920’s and 1930’s proves to not simply be a meaningless trend – rather an accurate reflection of the specific era.
The evolution of clothing has been drastically changed through the course of history, from the style to how they’re made. Women and men’s clothing changed at different rates. The way clothes are made reflect the style. Clothing always has been an important aspect of one’s culture as well as a representation of a time period. Overtime clothing has changed just as the people it clothes.
On the other, production side, it is argued, that changes in technologies and mass-production “created the competition in the women’s ready-made garment industry to push manufacturers an retailers to market dungarees and other standardised garments in new ways in order to expand their markets compete with one another”, as written by Ben Fine and Ellen Leopold (Clarke, S., Fine, B. and Leopold, E. (1994) ‘The world of consumption’, Contemporary Sociology,)
...oices of clothing helped modify the nation into what it is today. Thanks to this drastically diverse innovation in fashion, people were able to express power, wealth, and self-determination in the 1920’s, making it the era of change.
In relation to my work, the rationing of clothes during the second world war influenced the fashion of the working-class women as it became harder to find materials to make outfits, which then bought on the problem of too little material. The women working in the factories wore simple clothings such as overalls for the mere fact that it was comfortable, cheap, quick and easy to wear. The women carried large appropriate handbags to keep tools, rationing books and their essentials.
To conclude, the capability to create customized clothing is becoming undemanding as technology evolves. Ready made apparel was only available in predetermined sizes before the American Civil War, this exemplifies how the sizes were arbitrary and were not the same on a broad scale. The statement “The wealthy’s clothes were made by tailors” is a prime example of how tailored outfits are costly. Today, designers have computer-aided design to their disposal; this improved the creation of clothing in many ways, making it effortless to design the clothing and to also produce them. With the creation of new technology making clothes, fabrics will become easier.
Clothing changed the role that women played in the country, specified that they have more freedom, and indicated the social class in which one belongs. Sportswear became a change in fashion especially for teenagers. Designers began making less conservative sportswear with skirts made out of wool. Women began ...
In the early 1800s, France was the sole fashion capital of the world; everyone who was anyone looked towards Paris for inspiration (DeJean, 35). French fashion authority was not disputed until the late twentieth century when Italy emerged as a major fashion hub (DeJean, 80). During the nineteenth century, mass produced clothing was beginning to be marketed and the appearance of department stores was on the rise (Stearns, 211). High fashion looks were being adapted and sold into “midlevel stores” so that the greater public could have what was once only available to the social elite (DeJean, 38). People were obsessed with expensive fashions; wealthy parents were advised not the let their children run around in expensive clothing. People would wait for children dressed in expensive clothing to walk by and then they would kidnap them and steal their clothes to sell for money (DeJean, 39). Accessories were another obsession of France‘s fashion; they felt no outfit was complete without something like jewelry or a shrug to finish off the look and make it all around polished (DeJean, 61). As designers put lines together, marketing began to become important to fashion in the nineteenth century; fashion plates came into use as a way to show off fashion l...
“For as long as men and women have been wearing clothing, there has been a hierarchy based on garments. The clearest example arose when the sexes were segregated into skirts and pants: women would only wear dresses (a symbol of submission) and men would only wear trousers (proof of domination). Women’s clothing was created to impede and hamper movement (through tight or many layered skirts), while men enjoyed the ease and comfort of pant legs.” (Meza, Echazarreta) Women’s fashion throughout the ages can be used to trace the history of equality between men and women. As women achieved greater independence, they claimed the right to choose what they wore, and that included women being able to wear pants. There are three things that were instrumental in making it socially acceptable for women to wear pants, they include: the invention of the bicycle, WWII, and influential women.
Pantalettes, sometimes indicated major transitions in a girl's life signifying the going forward from infant to schoolgirl. From 1350 to mid 1500s, real fashion started to appear, as clothes were tailored to display the figure. During the 1700s, the Age of Enlightenment, ladies dressed in voluminous draped fabrics putting on a few more pounds. Tightly laced corsets were used in the bodices of their gowns, and hoops worn under their dresses, were made of flexible whalebone (a thin plastic strip used in stiffening corsets and bodices) held together by tapes (Fig. 1). During the industrial revolution in the 1800s, French designs dominated women's clothing, and women discarded the corset in favor of a softly bodice. Gowns were made with fewer layers and had leg-of-mutton sleeves (Fig. 2). In the 1870s, synthetic dyes were introduced due to the fact that they were cheaper and color-fast. Toward the 1900s, the Space Age, fashion quickly moved forward into the 20th century. By the end of the 19th-century, the fashion industry had broadened, partly due to the demand of women who had a more independent life style. In 1910, rayon was invented, the first man made fabric that substituted silk. Also, for the first time, hemlines rise above the ankles. During the early 20th century, nearly all high fashion originated in Paris and London. Fashion magazines from other countries sent editors and department stores sen...
In the late 18th century the Industrial Revolution occurred causing a huge shift in the ways in which clothing was produced and subsequently altering the ways in which clothing was perceived. For decades preceding industrialisation men and women of high so...
Clothing has been around for thousands of years; almost as long as the modern human has. At first, it served the practical purpose of protection from the elements; but, as life for early humans stopped being a constant struggle to survive, they started noticing how they looked and the concept of fashion began to take shape. These first few garments were typically dyed draped cloth that was pinned at the shoulder and/or waist. This was seen in many ancient civilizations around the world, Greek and Roman the most notable. Over time, clothing began to get more and more complex and formed to the body’s shape, eventually leading up to the tailored style we now have today. However, the sophisticated world of Haute Couture; or high fashion, can distinctly trace its roots to Paris during the mid-19th century. Clothing from there was thought to be superior to those from anywhere else, and women began to come from all over Europe just to buy dresses. This was probably due in part to one notable dressm...
Therefore, in an attempt to both show the gravitas of fashion’s impact and justify its mirroring of times and therefore society, a walkthrough of fashion throughout history and its adaptation is exceedingly appropriate. To begin with, Britain’s Industrial Revolution in the 1850s to 1900s came with the introduction of sewing machines and chemical dyes. However, this movement of clothe manufacturing rendered its availability strictly to the opulent. This is a direct relation to the economical situation of the time, showing that people’s expenses were not directed towards the most up to date fashion i.e. luxury products but rather necessities indicating a slowly developing economy. As we move from the 1900s to the mid 1920s, the inception of the First World War influenced the need for more ‘practical’ garments. To illustrate, one of the greatest designers of the century Paul Poiret, designed his garments in a style known as the Directoire. His dresses were simple straight tube sheaths defining simplicity and exemplifying both the political and economic situation of the times justifying the necessity for a free moving design in clothing. Why adopt the notion of simplicity and free moving garments? Women had to leave their traditional domestic roles and become part of the working class or work force and adopt and replace many roles that were normally given to men. Furthermore, the Great Depression in the 1930s comes to play its own role in fashion history further pushing the necessity for a fashion to be translated to accustom a busier lifestyle. This created an economic gap between the rich and the poor. Therefore, fashion in the 1940s in the substantial sense portrayed the necessity for work and socioeconomic background and furthermore encased the economic situation where, as previous times in the 1900s, high-end fashion was restricted to the rich. Following a chronological timeline comes the