Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The hurt locker movie analysis
Hollywood glamorization of war
The hurt locker movie analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The hurt locker movie analysis
Veterans of the war in Iraq are frustrated with the film The Hurt Locker in the way that it inaccurately portrays the process of a mission involving the disarming of roadside bombs. In movies, the ideas and concepts of things that we have not yet experienced in our own lives subconsciously instills itself in our minds and everyday thoughts. For example, when the mind thinks of any crime, like murder, a bank robbery, or being in jail, if you have not experienced these things first-hand, then there is no real way of knowing exactly what those things are like. But we think that movies give us all of the information that we need to know. War is the best example of this. By watching war films, the average civilian thinks that they have a general …show more content…
James defies the fear and sense of alertness that goes along with disarming these bombs. He is reckless, calm, casual, idiotic, and arrogant. But what allows him to be like this and succeed at what he does is his expertise in defusing the IEDs. This personality in a war highly unlikely. Sgt. James acts like he doesn’t care, and as if what he is doing is easy. This is what infuriates the veterans. They think they way he went about the missions and defusing the IEDs was absurd and not at all what it is really like. A bomb disposal team leader said in an article from 2010 in the Air Force Times that the main character’s “swagger would put a whole team at risk. Our team leaders don't have that kind of invincibility complex, and if they do, they aren't allowed to operate. A team leader's first priority is getting his team home in one piece." Recklessness was a constant theme throughout the film. Another theme throughout the story is the helplessness and the difference between America and Iraq. In one scene, there was an innocent man who was forced to be a suicide bomber. He was slowly walking towards the U.S. Army as they were yelling at him to stop and open his jacket. He finally listened and revealed a vest that had been locked to himself with several explosives, with a timer near its end. Sgt. James tried to clip all the locks from the man’s vest, but time was running out. There were too many locks and too little time, and there was nothing in their control of what was …show more content…
It causes for a sense of under-appreciation from the civilians towards the efforts made by people in the military to protect America. No one would ever be as reckless and nonchalant as Sgt. James
The reality that shapes individuals as they fight in war can lead to the resentment they have with the world and the tragedies that they had experienced in the past. Veterans are often times overwhelmed with their fears and sensations of their past that commonly disables them to transgress and live beyond the emotions and apprehensions they witness in posttraumatic experiences. This is also seen in everyday lives of people as they too experience traumatic events such as September 11th and the fall of the World Trade Center or simply by regrets of decisions that is made. Ones fears, emotions and disturbances that are embraced through the past are the only result of the unconscious reality of ones future.
The presentation and use of military personnel in the “Forever War” by Joe Haldeman and “Halo: The Fall of Reach” by Eric Nylund illustrate how science fiction depicts these individuals as disposable and replaceable. The negative treatment of soldiers can result in various mental problems and unnatural relationships if conditions remain the same. Although the characters in these stories are fictional, the mistreatment of military personnel can lead to future problems when the time comes for them to return to civilian life.
The soldiers were isolated from the outside world, and felt solidary confined within the oi rigs. They entertained themselves by playing football, shooting their rifles into the air and getting wasted with alcohol. Eventually, the soldiers were going insane and was tire of doing the same thing for the past six months and felt their “purpose” were served at all. The purpose of their duties were to guard the oil fields until their allies arrive to take control but the soldiers joined the military with the purpose to “serve and protect the united states of America against all foreign enemies”. The idea of serve and protect is completely differ from their point of view, and that is you can’t protect if there’s no harm to being protected from. They didn’t feel they had a purpose doing what they did and it wasn’t what they expect to being as “righteous” when citizens view a soldier. When civilians see a soldier in uniform, we often come to a conclusion that, this individual is risking their lives to protect ours. Private Swofford and battle buddy Corporal striving to have some type of action and were thirsty for an all-out battle with the enemies. Killing an Iraqi was an honor to them, the movie went on to how the soldiers were fighting over an enemy kill is an award to be cheer for. Corporal Alan Troy was an ex offender who lied to on his application to join the military and in order to stay in the military he would need to find all possible ways to proof he is capable of doing what others can and obtain the honor of a soldier. In order for him to proof he can be a soldier, he would need to rake up battle kills on his portfolio. In Juliet B. Schor’s essay on Work and Spend; it is our unceasing quest for material goods is part of the basic makeup of human beings. We work hard and want to obtain a reward; achievement for putting our time into something. It’s a structural process that
During war, this became apparent with the countless war crimes committed by soldiers; they were trained to not have any apprehension in regards to killing the Vietnamese, because they were “gooks” and of lesser form than a human. These violent events have scarred and traumatized some soldiers for the rest of their lives. Some soldiers have developed mental illnesses, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and depression. Some veterans will always live their lives damaged and in fear. Some have already taken their own lives because the burden of knowing and reliving what they went through during the Vietnam War was too much to bear.
According to the author Tim O’Brien, people tend to readily accept the ‘facts’ presented of what happened during a war. People do not consider the existence of fallacies regarding the actual stories of what happens in wars, few consider that the ‘facts’ of an incident often change through people’s words. The film ‘Saving the Private Ryan’ by Steven Spielberg features both facts and seemingness part of the war story. Since it is so difficult to fully describe a war using human language, Spielberg ended up revising his stories to make sense out of it. Spielberg included parts that did not occur or exclude parts that did occur in order to make their stories seem more credible. According to Tim O’Brien’s text “How to tell a True War Story,” he suggests that people must break out of listening to traditional war stories and scrutinize unbelievable and contradictory aspects of war stories, which is a more accurate way to obtain the truth about a war. Spielberg in his movie follows some of his path but also choose not to follow his path on some of the parts.
The film The Liberator portrays the life of Simon Bolivar, an influential activist in the revolutions against the Spanish Empire in South America. The movie does a great job in displaying the many aspects of Simon Bolivar, what he stood for and the way he felt towards his people. Like the majority of films this The Liberator has its flaws.
Terrence Malick’s The Thin Red Line (1998) is a film that examines the Guadalcanal Battle of World War II, looking past the physical results of the violence, in order to uncover the deeper truths and ramifications of war. The film conveys themes and ideologies that are somewhat uncommon to war films, especially WW II films. In this dark, surreal, journey, Malick takes us inside the minds of soldiers experiencing this battle to capture a remote pacific island from the Japanese. We do not hear or see gruff, hardened soldiers, anxious to die for their country. In fact, there are no heroes in The Thin Red Line. There are only regular men, scared of fighting and scared of dying, who have been thrown into a situation that will forever change their lives. The fighting is not suspenseful or glorious just brutal. Using an ideological approach to the study of film, this paper will examine The Thin Red Line’s messages about the truths of war, and how it challenges our society’s stereotypical view of war as a valiant undertaking where brave men fighting for good battle the evil of the enemy. Consequently, the ideologies that are uncovered will then be used to look at The Thin Red Line as a war film, and how it fits and does not fit into the genre.
An intriguing plot is the first thing people look for in a movie. War is a complicated subject so in a film about war, while it is important for the plot to be interesting, it is even more important that it is sensible and flows smoothly. This allows the audience to be entertained and keeps them from getting lost in too many complicated details. The Hurt Locker is the story of three men who are part of a United States Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal (E.O.D.) team stationed in Baghdad in 2004. Sergeant First Class William James is a daring specialist who knows everything there is to know about bombs, inside and out. He begins his rotation with Bravo Company after the former team leader is killed while attempting to disarm a roadside bomb. Bravo Company has just 38 days left on rotation and since James has arrived, those days are fraught with tension. James d...
The Hurt Locker is a war film that is set in Iraq during the Iraq War and fits in the adventure and action genre. The plot is about a three man bomb defusal team consisting of James, Sanborn, and Elridge finding themselves is extreme, life-threatening situations where they must defuse explosives over the violent conflicts. The director, Kathryn Bigelow, has done a good job with the mise-en-scene, making the setting overall extremely believable, giving a sense of realism in the film. The film’s mise-en-scene creates a believable Iraq War settings with the use costumes, weaponry, and all the grime and dirt present in places which sells the idea. Sounds and symbolism is used to show heavy tension amongst the soldiers .The film also contrasts James’s time in Iraq and his life back in America using the Supermarket scene. The idea portrayed in this film is the addiction to war which can be seen in James.
Of course, There is a lot of things that get blown off when you hear about war.But you really never think of what that person is thinking while in field and they have killed a man. There is no help to those who have been in the war and they see a guy they killed. Tim said in his book “ In the ordinary hours of life I try not to dwell
It glorifies soldiers as warriors not only because they are fighting the villains but are seen as heroes who defend the American values of freedom and democracy. As the United States has made these values the normative standards for itself and the rest of the world, the attitude of superiority has increased in the people, thus making it easier for the US to use the normative values as justification for military actions. The cooperation between media and government, which has unconditional support from American people by fostering a “peace through war” attitude, also help in strengthening a patriotic feeling in the society. This is probably the reason why people do not think about the numbers of others that the US military has killed as a negative issue. In the collective American mind, the US is militarily involved for the greater good, taking on the role of peacekeeper, thus making warrior culture a necessary component of peace culture in the
1980. Warner Bros. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Music by Wendy Carlos and Rcachel Elkind. Cinematography by John Alcott. Editing by Ray Lovejoy. With Jack Nicholson, Shelley Duvall, Danny Lloyd.
Love is a word that’s been both miss-used and over-used all at once. Romantic movies change our definition of and have a big impact on this definition greatly. There have been many movies and novels made over love, but never like this. “The Notebook” is a love story about unconditional love that two people have for each other. This emotionally, heart touching story will have your eyes blood-shot and burning from you not wanting to blink your eyes. This tremendously wonderful love story will have you not wanting to even miss a millisecond of this heart throbbing film. With many plot twists and many scenes that will have you falling off of your seat and you not having any nails by the end of the movie, this is the movie for you. This emotionally rich film is full of action, laughter, and romance, which is the perfect trio combination. This movie shows us how love can bind us together forever. This film went above and
‘Our interest in the parallels between the adaptation inter-texts is further enhanced by consideration of their marked differences in textual form,’
People tend to focus on their obedience to authority, thus disregarding their true feelings to what they’re doing. Obedience can go against morality, but people still think they are doing the right thing because they are obeying authority. Over time, people neglect to realize the actual act that they are doing. In A Few Good Men, Downey and Dawson commit murder, but because they are obeying orders they do it anyways. People are losing their minds trying to obey a higher power. In a recent study conducted by the National Alliance on Mental Illness, it was proven that one in five United States citizens experience a mental illness in one given year. Along with that, almost 25% of American soldiers have a severe mental illness from their services. Their constant obedience leads them to take their issues out in their jobs, resulting in dehumanizations. Robert Okin, a professor of psychiatry at University of California-San Francisco explains this by saying, “the abuse became an inexcusable way of working off their [soldiers’] rage, anxiety about their own safety, and their sense of helplessness” (Milgram 77). Dehumanization is an outlet to all of the soldiers’ issues. When they don't want to resolve their own issues or get help, soldiers have a lot of built up anger. This built up anger needs to be released. However, if they disobey and have an episode, they face