Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The house I live in film analysis
Racism in America in the 20th century
World War 2 and racism in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The house I live in film analysis
"The House I Live in" is based on the death of his housekeeper's son of the filmmaker Eugene Jarecki, who was inspired to add up the true cost of America's losing war on drugs. This film describe how American’s government tried to make the country free or drugs but at the same time using the money from the seizer. Based on this video we could tell that through the years in this country have been a racist feeling that separate and divided our communities. For example, black people used to live in the 1930s happy in the southern of United Stated but around the 1960s they were forced to move north because black girls were getting rape and for the government they were responsible of what happened to them and when that happened to a white girl then they were declared innocent and justice at that time just existed for white rich people. In the case of Nannie, who was raped when she was young and because of her skin color society …show more content…
But also, today we have a radio of 100:1 ration between crack and powder and 90% of the crack defendants in courts are African American that is why 35 million American report using illicit drug. Furthermore, in this film I found some examples of concepts that we had discussed in class such as the word role, which is when you expect a behavior associated with a particular status in this case was with black people as they made wrong assumptions that just because they were black they tented to consumed more drugs than white people. Also, risky shift which is when people in a group are more likely to make risky decisions than if they are alone as they decided to sell drugs and rape and do illegal acts. the last one but not least will be social stratification which is a system of structured social inequality like the American
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
The fact that War on Drugs and incarceration is a rebirth of caste of America, is correct. If you are African- American you will go to prison because of the caste system. People choice to be what they want to be. Yet Michelle point is correct, human beings need to realize everyone is different. Problems are created because one it creates them. Also we talked about the nullification system in class, and is one way in solving racism in the justice system and the government. Michelle Alexander uses statistic through the book. She explains the difference from 1990s to today’s world. This makes it easier for the reader to tell the contrast.
Drugs seem to be an issue everywhere. Just like alcohol, the drug trade is not a primary issue for one race. Drugs serve a heavy impact to all those involved. Drugs are not just reserved to those that use them, but also to the manufacturers and distributors of the drugs. An excerpt from Anderson (1990) involves a former dealer describing the drug culture. He states, “The way I see it, there’s top dogs, middle dogs, and low dogs. The top dogs are the guys with the money, dudes with the cars…the middle dogs are the ones who sell drugs for the top dogs…and they sell it to the low dogs” (p. 7). However, it does not stop there. Drugs also affect the family and friends of those involved. Many residing within areas centered on drugs often times express feelings of anxiety and fear. Wacquant (2007) states that petty theft, drug use, the resale of stolen goods, vandalism, and alcoholism are the most visible form of delinquency (p. 208).
One, the drug war is aimed at eliminating big-time drug dealers. Two, the war on drugs is eradicating dangerous drugs. Throughout the book, Alexander refuted both of these common misconceptions about the war on drugs. According to study conducted by Ryan King and Marc Meur, they found 80 percent of drug arrest in the 1990s was for marijuana. While it is arguable marijuana is far less harmful than tobacco and alcohol, is it is illegal and people should not do it. However, what is interesting about marijuana is the stigma associated with it. According to Alexander, marijuana was seen as a fearsome drug when associated with African-Americans and Latinos but was less stigmatizing when associated with Caucasians. According to book titled Unequal Under Law: Race and the War on Drugs, author Doris Marie Provine said “punishment becomes more severe when drug use is associated with people of color but softens when it is associated with whites.” An example of crime that becomes “softer” when associated with whites is drunk driving. According to The Crack Attack: America’s Latest Scare, drunk drivers accounted for 22,000 deaths in 1989. In addition to that, about 100,000 alcohol-related deaths occurred that same year. The author, Craig Reinarman, compared that statistic to the number of deaths from AIDS, drug overdose and violence associated with illegal drug trade and all three accounted for only 21,000 deaths. Drunk driving crimes are usually committed primarily by white males. According to the book, The Crack Attack: America’s Latest Scare, 78 percent of drunk drivers during 1990 were white males. During 1990, new mandatory minimums charges were created where drivers could either receive fines, license suspension, complete community service or sentenced to only two days in jail for their first offense. While on the other hand individuals who had crack cocaine, which is seen as a
In 1971 on June 17, President Richard Nixon delivered a special message to the Congress on drug abuse prevention and control. During the presentation, Nixon made it clear that the United States was at war with this idea of drug abuse. What baffled Americans then, and still baffles Americans today, is that we are at war with our own nation with drugs; it is not some foreign affair like the media tends to focus on with Mexico. Nixon stated that at the time of his speech, what was implemented to control drug abuse was not working…“The problem has assumed the dimensions of a national emergency. I intend to take every step necessary to deal with this emergency, including asking the Congress for an amendment to my 1972 budget to provide an additional $155 million to carry out these steps. This will provide a total of $371 million for programs to control drug abuse in America.”(Wolleey and Peters) Since the publicizing of the term “War on Drugs” in 1971, it has been used by many political candidates in elections over the years. In the movie, it was stated, “ every war begins with propaganda …[and] the war on drugs has never been actually on drugs… [Additionally] drug laws are shaped less by scientific facts, but more by political [reasoning].” (Jarecki) The movie, The House I Live In, directly relates to certain themes and terminology that were discussed in Martin and Nakayama’s Intercultural Communication in Contexts book, that have been used in class. Through the analyzing and comparing of The House I Live In and Intercultural Communication in Contexts an individual can begin to localize the ideals behind this everlasting war on drugs; some ideals focus on terms from the text like ethnocentrism, diversity training, and culture while ...
...haviors he so wishes to comprehend are those whom he labels as The Cocaine Kids. Now that examples of these drug sellers’ behaviors have been provided, the criminological theories that can explain such behaviors have been made visible to the unseen eye. Criminological theories including the theory of Differential Association, the Subculture of Violence Theory, and the Social Learning Theory can be viewed as methods for developing a knowledgeable understanding of how and why such behaviors introduced individuals to the drug-selling world, kept them submerge deep within it, and allowed for them to leave it.
People who live below poverty line, one-way or another encounter racism all over the world. Even in America where most people believe democracy is practiced more than anywhere else, racism does exist and shed light on the discrepancy persist in the city of Yonkers. In accordance with Briggs (1999), African American and Hispanic families have been a victim of racially segregated and placed in the inner city areas. In addition to this, there have been instances of vigorous political resistance where sites were proposed for the housing project. Do not forget that just build public housing throughout every community where empty spaces are available could not resolve issues like segregation, housing, and poverty. Congress should need to increase
Home can vary from people, culture, and even for each of them that word can change over the years. In addition, home doesn’t look the same for all the people in the world; but what is the same in all cultures, is that home means more than a house where you live. Home means love, family, unity, comfort, security, and belonging. Also, what I call home, is a belief that is more tied to a sentimental than in a material or physical concept. It is the right place where I should be, where I am not alone, feel good, and where my family and my dearest ones are with me. I consider that home to me, has different meanings that are attached to a single feeling, which is love. There is a phrase that explains exactly what a home means, which is: "Home is where the heart is."
As I approach the island on which my dream house awaits, I catch a quick
As a seller open house should present your home at its best. One method of making your home inviting to buyers is to add scents throughout the rooms of the home. The ability to smell is one of our most engaging senses. It immediately triggers emotions and memories recreating images in our minds with very little effort. Our reaction to these pleasant scents is taking a deep breath causing a calming effect relaxing our bodies and mind. During open houses it’s a reaction sellers want, it generates a sense of home for the potential buyer heightening a natural attraction to your home.
“Home is where love resides, memories are created, friends always belong, and laughter never ends (Robot check).” A place becomes a home for me when I am around all the things that I enjoy and love. For example, when I am around everyone that I love, I enjoy a peaceful environment and the beautiful landscapes around me. The interpretation of home for me is not a physical thing that I see or that I can remember or even certain thoughts that I can relate, but it is a sensation that overcomes me when I envision being in the comfort of my own home. However, I know that this is a feeling that is calming to my soul and it quietly reassures me that I genuinely belong in a place where I can be free from people constantly judging me.
Throughout our lives on this planet, there are various places that we call home. For some people, home is where you grew up. For others it may be where most, if not all, of your family currently reside. For me, home is a small town called Carlisle, Pennsylvania. It may not be where I am originally from, but it is where I spent most of my adolescent years. Throughout the past few years, Carlisle has become a different place to me. It has grown and changed just as I have; however, in many ways, it is still the charming little town I remember,
Slums have been in Egypt for four decades now. Similar to any other slum in the world Egypt’s slums suffer from lack of water, sewage, waste disposal, education, and health. UNHABITAT definition of slums a “group of individuals living under the same roof that lack one or more of the following conditions: access to safe water, access to improved sanitation, secure tenure, and sufficient living areas.” (cn.unhabitat.org). Number of slums in Egypt is 1,221 areas. Those slums are occupied by almost 70.17 million inhabitants. (“Slums in Egypt”. egypt.electionnaire.com ). The slums are caused by many factors. First youth migrant laborers, in rural areas youth don’t have many jobs opportunities so they start moving to the urban areas in search for their city dream and better opportunities. Second, poverty is like a genetic disease that is inherited and passed by one generation to the other which makes it impossible to escape. Third the absence of law and Disparity in distributing wealth and inequality are also major causes of the slums. Last but not least the poor people generally believe the more the children the better life, but in fact it affects them negatively ending up not able to feed their children. The effects of slums are not only affecting the slums’ dwellers but also the surrounding neighborhoods and the government. Moreover, growing up in slums results in dropping out school; in which generates inequality of opportunities and make the dwellers get stuck in dead end jobs. Also the life conditions the dwellers are facing make them exposed to many diseases. The stakeholders for this problem are donors, government, slums communities, some NGOs (UNCHS, Cities Alliance, UNDP, UNICEF, and ILO), national partners, and business...
Both of my parents are working, so m family is a two income family. Differed from the general idea and the previous research mentioned above, wife should do housework, both father and mother should do house tasks in my family. For me, their division of labor in house seems pretty equal. Usually, my father does (1) cooking for dinner, (2) taking out the trash, (3) cleaning bathroom, and (4) washing dishes while my mother does (1) cooking for breakfast, (2) washing clothes, (3) maintaining a flower bed, and (4) cleaning living room. My younger sister folds up our clothes. Any other tasks are done by who realizes first. Since my parents was working, they hired two housekeepers as domestic outsourcing, “which is paying non-family members to do family-related tasks” (Wade and Ferree, 2014, p. 354) when my sister and I was small. They cared us. After growing up, the biggest sister began to take care of younger siblings. Before I realized the equal division of housework between my father and my mother, almost all house-tasks seem to be done
It was a windy day in the fall, a Saturday to be exact, and the trees were bare and the ground was cold. There was a midnight frost that had melted away as the sunshine left the grass with the familiar dewey residue that would make the lower half of one’s canvas-dyed converse damp and slightly moist, but not enough to bother the sock. I trudged through this natural slop and wound my key lanyard nervously around my fingers, contemplating the idea of just throwing my home key into the thin strip of woods between my house and the next, knowing it would be hard to find them once I did. When I was about three meters from my door, I stopped. I did not want to talk to my family, nor did I want to step foot inside that house. I had already checked the