Roe v. Wade: A Pivot in Reproductive Rights

1313 Words3 Pages

The historic case of Roe v. Wade was a pivotal case that changed the way the court system viewed a woman’s reproductive rights. To this day the topic of abortion has people torn between the legal rights of the woman and her right to choose what to do with her own body. This side is known as the pro- choice side. The other side of the debate wants to protect the moral rights of the fetus stating that the unborn child must have rights as well. The hard thing to do was to determine for some is when the life of the fetus can be considered a living person with rights. The state of Texas that was arguing on the rights for the fetus also known as the pro-life side. The state believed that the unborn child should have rights to life. For this reason …show more content…

The woman at the center of the case named in court documents as Jane Roe grew up as Norma McCorvey. Norma had been a victim of childhood abuse and in order to escape the abuse at home she dropped out of school in ninth grade to marry a man who would turn out to physically and emotionally abuse her as well. After having left her husband and struggling to make ends meet Norma found herself pregnant. At the time Texas state law prohibited the termination of a pregnancy by artificial means, except when the life of the mother was put in danger, rape, or incest has occurred. Roe claimed that she had been raped and wanted an abortion but since there was never any evidence that a rape had ever happened Roe could not procure an abortion. Roe consulted with an attorney named Sarah Weddington and found the statues were unconstitutional because they infringed on her right to personal privacy, protected by the first, fourth, fifth, ninth, and fourteenth amendments. At this time Roe decided to take federal action against the District Attorney Henry Wade of Dallas County, Texas on her behalf and all other women in similar situations. Roe decided to go ahead with the case even though it would not help her pregnancy situation. Roe would later on give birth to the baby and put it up for …show more content…

The cases presented the situations of the pregnant single woman, the childless couple, and the practicing physician. They determined that Roe and Hallford had just cause to sue because they presented justiciable controversies. The Doe’s had failed to allege facts sufficient to state a present controversy, thus they had no standing for a case. It was decided that with respect to the respect to the requests for a declaratory judgment, abstention was not warranted. The court found that the fundamental rights of single women and married persons to choose whether to have children is protected under the ninth amendment, through the fourteenth amendment. They also found that the Texas abortion statutes are void as vagueness and for overbroadly infringing the ninth and fourteenth amendment rights of the plaintiffs. The district court ruled in Roe’s favor on the legal merits of her case, but declined to grant an injunction against the enforcement of the laws barring

More about Roe v. Wade: A Pivot in Reproductive Rights

Open Document