More handpicked essays just for you.
Definition of the 2nd amendment controversy if any sounding the amendment
Argumentative essays
Interpretation of the 1st amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The United States Constitution was constructed from a set of rules which secure the basic rights of all United States citizens. These rights are considered as the "inalienable" and should be exercised as indicated within the documents. The creation of the Bill of Rights sparked the beginning of the gun control debate. These debates are usually done by educated citizens which reflects this topic for public policies through representative institutions. Furthermore, the process of these debates in politics is known as Deliberative democracy. One side of the debate argues about gun rights and the other side argues about gun controls. "Gun rights" refers to the right to keep and bear arms whereas "gun control" refers to the policies and laws that …show more content…
There are an absolutely insane number of guns in the United States: More than 300 million, more than one per person." Therefore, it is not surprising that America has the highest death rate due to gun violence in the world. The danger that comes with guns demonstrates that stricter gun laws need to be enacted in the United states. Through this paper first I will discuss the alternative interpretation of the second amendment; Second, I will talk about gun violence. While "the NRA (National Rifle Association) believes that every law-abiding citizen is entitled to the ownership and legal use of firearms", I will argue that the production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the U.S. The recent shootings at Las Vegas and Parkland school in Florida have indicated the urgent needs for stricter regulations that will make it more difficult for citizens to possess a …show more content…
According to the ongoing analysis by The Washington Post, "estimates that since Columbine, more than 150,000 students in at least 170 primary or secondary schools have experienced a campus shooting". There were several other mass shootings that took the lives of many people all over America. In short, loopholes in gun control laws are allowing prohibited people to access firearms easily. As the country with the largest stockpile of privately owned firearms, we aren’t doing much to prevent them from falling in the wrong hands. The deadly attack in Parkland, Florida, for example was the recent mass shooting occurred in February in which seventeen people were killed and seventeen more were wounded, making it one of the world's deadliest massacres. Another incident in Las Vegas in which 58 people were killed and more than 500 were wounded when Stephan Paddock from a perch high in a hotel opened fire onto a crowd of concertgoers. According to the New York Times, "a vast- majority of guns used in 19 recent mass shootings were actually bought legally and with a federal background check. At least nine gunman had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that didn't prevent them from obtaining their weapons". Even though in Parkland, Florida, Nikolas Cruz who was identified by witnesses and arrested had
In Mallory Simon article "Gun Debate: Where is the Middle Ground?" Amardeep Kaleka made a vow: He would do whatever he could to ensure nobody ever went through what his family had. When his father was one of the victims of the Sikh shooting. Kaleka asked a panel of polar opposite views if there was a middle ground. Though they had opposite views the panel was able to come to an agreement that enforcing background checks is the middle ground. It will take a lot of money and resources but they feel it is the best option/first step to improving gun control in America.
The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms, but only in cases of self-defense and hunting for food. However, the use of guns has drastically changed since 1791 when the amendment was implemented. Today, guns are not solely used in their intended ways. Since 2010, over eighty-seven school shootings have occurred within American grade schools, high schools, and universities, resulting in approximately 107 injuries and 109 murders of innocent students. The two most deadly shootings in the world occurred in the United States: the Virginia Tech University Massacre which left thirty-two dead and Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting which left twenty-eight dead. Each new shooting prompts a debate about gun control laws and leaves citizens wondering about the accessibility of guns; any United States citizen over the age of twenty-one that does not have any previous felonies is able to easily receive a gun license. Forty-nine out of the sixty-one school shootings that occurred between 1982 and 2012 legally obtained firearms. The statistics become even more outstanding: seventy nine percent of all shooters have been diagnosed with a mental illness or disability, including the Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook shooters, Seung-Hui Cho and Adam Lanza. Cho and Lanza were diagnosed with mental illnesses and disabilities, depression and autism, respectively. Even so, they were still able to acquire the guns they needed because extensive mental health background checks did not and still do not exist; Cho purchased his own weapon and Lanza stole his mother’s guns. Although the case studies of Lanza and Cho are only two out of the many school shootings, they should be considered prime examples to illustrate the necessity to add stri...
In the United States there has been, “372 mass shootings in the US in 2015, killing 475 people and wounding 1,870” (BBC). Some recent shootings in the United States, for instance are Sandy Hook, Antigo high school in Wisconsin where there was one death and two injured, Madison high school in Ohio where 4 kids under the age of 15 were shot and injured, etc. One shooting in particular that will be focused on is
According to Mallory Simon in her article “Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?” there is a necessity to find common ground in the gun debate in America after incidents like the shooting at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin and the “school massacre” in Newtown, Connecticut. Amardeep Kaleka, whose father was gunned down in the Sikh temple shooting in Wisconsin, questions whether representatives from panelists such as the National Rifle Association, the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence, law enforcement representatives, and other participants can agree on anything. Sandra Froman of the National Rifle Association believes there is common ground; however, when Dan Gross of the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence mentioned common ground when
Opposing sides have for years fought over the laws that govern firearms. For the purposes of this paper "Gun Control" is defined as policies enacted by the government that limit the legal rights of gun owners to own, carry, or use firearms, with the intent of reducing gun crimes such as murder, armed robbery, aggravated rape, and the like. So defined, gun control understandably brings favorable responses from some, and angry objections from others. The gun control debate is generally publicized because of the efforts of the Pro-Gun Lobby or the Anti-Gun Lobby.
The United State of America, established by the Founding Father who lead the American Revolution, accomplished many hardship in order to construct what America is today. As history established America’s future, the suffering the United State encountered through history illustrate America’s ability to identify mistakes and make changes to prevent the predictable. The 2nd Amendment was written by the Founding Father who had their rights to bear arms revoked when they believe rising up to their government was appropriate. The Twentieth Century, American’s are divided on the 2nd Amendment rights, “The right to bear arms.” To understand why the Founding Father written this Amendment, investigating the histories and current measures may help the American people gain a better understanding of gun’s rights in today’s America.
The issue of stricter gun control laws is an on-going battle that continues to be debated at both the local and federal levels. Regardless of one’s viewpoint on the matter, this subject makes for a very passionate debate on both sides. At question is whether or not stricter laws and regulations help reduce the number of gun-related crimes. Obviously, the answers vary greatly depending on the strongly held viewpoint of the responders.
... or someone else’s. Our constitution gives us the right to “have a well- regulated militia …the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Is carrying a gun our constitutional right or is our American constitution putting us all in danger? Every Tom, Dick and Harry will always have their own opinion on whether guns are a way to save lives or take them away.
The major reason that causes violence, death and the sufferance of people in the United States are the weapons--the guns. According to the statistic Thetrace.org provided, as of December 23, a total of 12,942 people had been killed in the U.S in 2015 in a gun homicide, unintentionally. In another word, 36 Americans are dead from a gunshot on average day, Thetrace.org stated. Even worse, “there were 372 mass shootings in the U.S. in 2015, killing 475 people and wounding 1,870” according to the Mass Shooting Tracker, which catalogues these incidents. Mass shootings — as measured by four or more people shot, regardless of total fatalities — have taken place in nearly 100 metro areas over the past 12 months,
Gun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
Over the course of the past few years, mass killings have escalated in the United States, causing an immense uproar from the many American citizens demanding a solution. Due to the two conflicting sides regarding the solution, gun control; many are not able to come to an agreement. While some argue gun control is the only way to help stop the mass killings that are on the high rise, others argue that it is against the Constitution and against one’s rights to not be able to bear arms. Gun control, although portrayed as the only solution to the mindless killing, is not the answer to today’s violence; in fact many believe that stricter gun control enables more mass shootings to take place (Statistics show mass shootings more frequent with strict gun control). The problem is not gun ownership, it is the increasing tendency towards violence in the United States (Stone).
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
Gun control is one of the most divisive issues in the United States. Every time there is a massacre, the arguments for and against inflame the national debate but without producing results. It is an ideological chasm separating the two camps. Some defend an eternal and intangible right, the others are alarmed at its social cost. For some, the responsibility is individual, and the State must be confined to a role of arbitrator while for the others it is collective and the State is entitled to put in place a preventive policy. In the chaos a lot of chatter also goes towards background checks as today they are considered one of the most basic and important parts of gun ownership. However,it is still a large looming dilemma in the fight
The United States is one of the only countries with the continuing problem of mass murder. 58 people lost their lives and more than 50 were injured when a man opened fire at an outdoor country music festival in Las Vegas on October 1st, 2017 (Hanley 6). This is one of countless massacres that have occurred in the United States. It is no surprise when one turns the TV on in the morning and a “News Flash” story pops up on the latest shooting. Gregory Kate of USA Today states that there has been greater than 200 events of mass murder in the past 10 years. It is no secret that guns are an easily accessible weapon in the United States, and in numerous other countries that is not the case. Most people can obtain a firearm with a simple, online background check on a computer. Within minutes the check is completed. Kate states the only people to be declined would be: "felons, fugitives, drug addicts, the mentally ill, illegal immigrants, some legal immigrants, people
In the U.S. Constitution, it states that we have our own right to bear arms. The right to bear arms has two meanings. One is to defend the country. The other is to protect the right of the people. The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is always being overlooked, therefore, causes the issue in resulting why guns are being abused throughout society. Although, guns can be routinely be effective, especially for war purposes, however, guns rather carry significant harm than they are beneficial. In America, we heard concerning the countless tragedies over the last decade involving the misuse of guns. Following the mass shooting tragic event at Sandy Hook Elementary School to present day, as stated in The Guardian, it states, “More than 90,000 Americans have been shot and killed by guns; more than 210,000 have been shot and injured; and there have been more than 1,000 mass shooting incidents where four or more people have been shot at one time” (Smith).