Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Books vs movies compare contrast
Books vs movies compare contrast
Books vs movies compare contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Books vs movies compare contrast
From J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” to F. Scotts Fitzgerald “The Great Gatsby”, there is no doubt that books and movies have portrayed different views due to the loyalty of its fans. Reading a book is not the easiest task in the world and has nothing to do with the ability to concentrate, but has to do with whether or not the book is of personal interest. Movies tend to be a hit and miss on whether it was enjoyable or not. Perhaps, unlike books, movies cannot be picked up and put down when the time is convenient, as a book can, and is bound by the visualization of a director and his resources. Reading a book can be either quite boring or exciting depending on the genre. For some, action books are best enjoyed through large screenings with a daring orchestrated soundtrack blaring from the surround sound speakers. All the while, romance books can be read and relished …show more content…
Not only does reading expand a person’s vocabulary but it also mentally prepares them. I find that books when reading in a semi-quiet atmosphere with a cup of tea can become intriguing by being enhanced by my surroundings. Books serve as a mental stimulation and can be an activity for your brain to engage in itself, preventing it from losing its necessary power. Stress reduction, memory improvement, and critical thinking skills all can be the product of reading a book. However, even reading one page of a boring history book can put me to sleep. Seeing the actual Battle at Bunker Hill for 12 dollars on screen seems tempting to most students trying to pass the quiz and not actually read the assignment. These are the reasons why books are slowly being put down to rest and demanded to be produced digitally. When Harry Potter appeared to be a boy wearing round glasses accompanied by a duo containing a hot-headed boy and a curly haired girl-genius, then of course movies would be the typical winner in the battle of visual representation in the media
As you can all see the movie for once is actually better than the book in showing the
Movies based on books try to captivate the audience while staying true to the story.
Have you ever thought about when a producer makes a movie out from a well- known novel, how many scene will actually stick to the original story? It has been a trend that the movie industries tend to dismiss many details from the original book in order to gain more rating or revenue from the movie. On the other hand, many viewer will argue or dislike the fact that the movie industries disrespect the author of the book. Recently I got the chance to read The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald and watch the 2013 version’s movie. While the book and the film are pretty similar; there is one major different between the book itself and the movie.
Whenever books are adapted for film, changes inevitably have to be made. The medium of film offers several advantages and disadvantages over the book: it is not as adept at exploring the inner workings of people - it cannot explore their minds so easily; however, the added visual and audio capabilities of film open whole new areas of the imagination which, in the hands of a competent writer-director, can more than compensate.
As the case with most “Novel to Movie” adaptations, screenwriters for films will make minor, and sometimes drastic, adjustments to the original text in order to increase drama and to reach modern audiences. Baz Luhrmann’s 2013 film interpretation of The Great Gatsby followed the 1925 classic great plot quite accurately, with minor deviations. However, Luhrmann made some notable differences to the characters and settings of The Great Gatsby in order for the story to relate to the current generation and to intensity the plot
It’s pretty clear that film and literature are very different mediums and when you try to make one into the other, such as an adaptation, you’re going to have some things that are lost in translation and seen in a different light. When an original work is made into a movie, I think they’re kind of at a disadvantage because they only have a few hours to get the whole story across while also keeping the viewer intrigued by what is taking place on the screen right in front of their eyes. Movies are able to contain special effects, visuals, and music though which can impact a viewer and make a scene stay in their mind longer which is a plus side to being able to view something. Literature on the other hand, has a greater advantage. They can keep the reader entertained for a considerably long time and you’re able to get more information about people and events such as what a character is thinking or what is happening behind the scenes during a specific event. I understand that people are going to have different opinions when it comes to whether a book or film adaptation of a work is the best and it is not always going to be the same for each and every piece of work. One thing I think though, is that The Namesake in both the film and the movie, they’re both accurate and concise in the way that they relate to one another.
The Great Gatsby is a novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald in the 1920s. The story is narrated by Nick Carraway as he moves from the Midwest to New York City, in the fictional town of West Egg along Long Island. The story is primarily focused on the attractive, young and mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby and his love for Daisy Buchanan. Pursuing the American Dream, Nick lived next door to Jay Gatsby, and across the bay from his cousin, Daisy, and her husband,Tom Buchanan. It is then that Nick is drawn into the striking world of the riches' lusts, loves, lies and deceits. The Great Gatsby explores themes of love, social changes, and irony, creating a image of the Golden Twenties that has been described as the tale about the American Dream.
is Nick. In the novel Nick is a man who comes from a poor family who
Linda Hutcheon argues that adaptations are often considered as second-line art forms, since they are always originated from other pieces of arts, hence critics and reviewers usually compare these works with the original ones. When people talk about adaptations, most of the time they think about literary texts like a novel or short story being remade as a big screen movie, or a television show and opinions are usually that these remade stories are less in value, then the original ones, although there are other forms of art, like ballet, or opera which are less attacked by public opinion. This might be because, people tend to think about texts like novels and such superior to any other art form because of it is among the first ones of their kind, and it lets the reader to use their imagination and create a world of their own, while movies take this experience away from the viewer. The reason of the popularity of adaptations nowadays might be explained with financial facts. It is simply because if something made profit and was popular once, there is a high possibility of it will do the...
As stated numerous times throughout this essay, movies must stay true to their book predecessor for full effect. Books are normally beautifully described and written, and help the reader visualize a completely new world. Most movies, not just The Book Thief, normally omit several
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Our society advertises movies much more than books. This shows that our society, as a whole, values movies over books. There are far fewer similarities between books and movies than differences. Both are used as a form of entertainment and tell a story.
The Great Gatsby which was filmed in Sydney, Australia was released on May 1st 2013. This phenomenal film includes some of Hollywood’s best actors, Jay Gatsby is played by the one and only Leonardo Di Caprio, Nick Carraway is played by Tobey Maguire, Daisy Buchanan is portrayed by Carey Mulligan, Tom Buchanan is played by Joel Edgerton, Elizabeth Debicki plays Jordan Baker, Myrtle Wilson is played by Isla Fisher, Jason Clarke portrays George Wilson, The owl-eyed man is played by Max Cullen and Wolfsheim is played by India’s greatest actor named Amitabh Bachchan. This film is filmed in some of the most beautiful places in Sydney, Australia. Gatsby’s mansion is the Saint Patrick’s Seminary, the Valley of the ashes are filmed at the Balmain and
Movies are a great version of storytelling because they make stories more relatable and memorable. Storytelling is one of the most powerful capabilities humans possess. It can be used to motivate, dominate, and influence people. The scope and power of storytelling has grown immensely from its roots in stories told over the campfire. It now covers every dimension of human emotion and endeavor. This makes stories incredibly relatable and influential in that one can relate to the emotions that are being depicted and can, if wanted to, be influenced by the decision the character made. Before movies were invented, people relied on speaking and “the written word” to hear stories. Each person visualized the story’s characters, sets, and actions differently. Moviemakers have moved a step further in the way of storytelling. They take it upon themselves to physically set up the sets, give faces to the characters, and sh...
People have to be determined and focused in order to complete a whole book. Everyone has, at some point of their life tried to read a book and some have even given up after battling to read through the first page. On the other hand, watching movies is easy and can save a lot of time. Usually a movie takes about two hours, while reading a book could take more than a week or even months for some readers. Individuals think perusing books and watching movies are the same, so they will watch the movie for their time 's sake. Also, watching movies provide superior picture about the story since it is visual and is within a short timeframe so, the audience can remember the story easier. To add more, you can complete a movie in one sitting while to complete a book, you have to work hard and give a lot time for it. Furthermore, you can do anything while watching movies. For instance, you can do your assignment while watching movies or cook food and watch movies. On the other hand, while reading a book, you need to be fully focused on it else you don’t understand what’s happening in the story. Besides, movies continue renewing each week, whereas for a book to be composed and distributed takes a lot of time (Lee, wordpress.com). Before movies were made, most of the population read books to engage and improve themselves. Since movies came out, people are pulled in by the delightful and bright representation in the motion