The Great Gatsby Ethical Analysis

779 Words2 Pages

A Society Lacking Ethics Like God observing the world, we are the observers of The Great Gatsby. According to German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s two categorical imperatives, Daisy and Jay were unethical. Kant’s categorical imperatives state; ‘Act as if your action could be elevated into universal law’ and. Based on the principles of Kant, Daisy and Jay were unethical in several ways, according to Kant’s two categorical imperatives. Daisy used people emotionally and lacked responsibility, and Jay was manipulative towards the people around him. The Great Gatsby is a great example of a society that does not abide by Kantian principles. The eyes of Doctor T.J. Eckleburg are perhaps the most important symbol in The Great Gatsby. The eyes can be taken as the eyes of God or even as us, the observers. We are observing the characters in what they do and analyzing them as an example of what is wrong or what is right. In this case, we are observing Daisy Buchanan and Jay Gatsby. We are observing their conducts and deciphering whether their actions are wrong or right. First of all, Daisy Buchanan was unethical …show more content…

He manipulated Nick ask Daisy to tea and keep it a secret. He manipulates Daisy to keep seeing him, even though she is married. He is good at getting what he wants, as is seen many times throughout the movie. Jay is rich and is able to use money however he wants, so he buys luxurious things that he does not personally want or use, but buys them to impress Daisy. That is a small way that Jay manipulates Daisy. If everyone manipulated each other, like most characters in The Great Gatsby do, no one would have any true intentions and things would not work. For example, it did not end well for anyone in the movie because they all manipulated each other. Daisy ended up where she always ends up; unhappily stuck with her husband. Nick ended up insane, and constantly questioning others motives. Jay ended up

Open Document