The Grapes Of Wrath Rhetorical Analysis

822 Words2 Pages

The Priority of Wealth John Steinbeck is the acclaimed writer of the 1930’s novel, The Grapes of Wrath. The book is told in the point of view of the Joad family. He tells tell the story of its journey from Oklahoma to California, with including the family’s hope for success and prosperity in this new land. The Joad’s are let down along the way. Throughout The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck makes an effective claim of inner conflict: a person with the least to give should be the most likely to help. Steinbeck works logically presenting his claim in the easily pitied Rose of Sharon and the personable Mae. However, Steinbeck’s ethos can be questioned, since he lacks the personal experience of poverty. This leaves the audience feeling unconvinced at the beginning of the novel since his background is not a credible resource on the Joad’s experience. From the beginning of the novel, the Joads are introduced as an extended, …show more content…

In the novel’s conclusion it is inferred that the Joad family has nothing left to give. When Rose of Sharon gives birth to a stillborn, the idea of hope begins to fade away for the family. At this point, pathos has been invoked in the audience after the loss of Rose of Sharon’s baby. As the family moves forward, the family comes across a farm for shelter and finds a starving man and child. Rose of Sharon asks her family to leave the barn for privacy, sits down, and breastfeeds the starving man in order for him to live. This is a significant conflict solved based on Steinbeck’s claim. She has had almost everything lost or taken from her. Logically, the reader would believe that she would no longer feel empathetic for anyone else. However, she looks at someone who is in a considerably poor state of life, and offers all that she has in order for him to live. This behavior and action would not be expected from those wouldn’t know what it’s like to

Open Document